Comparative in-vitro antimicrobial activity of silver- and minocycline–rifampin–chlorhexidine-coated needle-free connectors

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Y. Truong, J. Rosenblatt, B. Gerges, Y. Jiang, I. Raad
{"title":"Comparative in-vitro antimicrobial activity of silver- and minocycline–rifampin–chlorhexidine-coated needle-free connectors","authors":"Y. Truong,&nbsp;J. Rosenblatt,&nbsp;B. Gerges,&nbsp;Y. Jiang,&nbsp;I. Raad","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Needle-free connectors (NFCs) are widely used to access vascular infusion circuits. Despite their safety benefits, NFCs still present risks for colonization and vascular ingress by pathogenic microbes. Antimicrobial NFCs present one approach to prevent microbial colonization over all colonizable surfaces of NFCs, with the advantage of potentially protecting all vulnerable internal and external NFC surfaces.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study compared a commercially available silver-coated NFC with a novel minocycline–rifampin–chlorhexidine (MRC)-coated NFC in an in-vitro model posing a severe microbial challenge following 1 and 7 days of elution in a 50% serum solution to simulate clinical use of the NFCs. Microbial challenges were performed against clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA), multi-drug-resistant <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Candida albicans</em> as representative of the major classes of highly virulent bloodstream infectious pathogens.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results following 1 day of elution showed colonization of uncoated NFCs of 4.45 x 10<sup>6</sup> colony-forming units (CFU)/NFC for MRSA, 5.20 x 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/NFC for <em>C. albicans</em> and 3.68 x 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/NFC for <em>P. aeruginosa</em>. The silver NFC presented approximately a 1 log<sub>10</sub> reduction for <em>P. aeruginosa</em> and similar colonization densities as the control for MRSA and <em>C. albicans</em>. In contrast, the MRC NFC showed no colonization by any of the challenge pathogens. Similar results were obtained following 7 days of elution.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The differences between the MRC and silver NFCs were significant (<em>P</em>&lt;0.005). The MRC NFC has potential to reduce line infections, and therefore merits further in-vivo and clinical testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"161 ","pages":"Pages 114-118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125001021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Needle-free connectors (NFCs) are widely used to access vascular infusion circuits. Despite their safety benefits, NFCs still present risks for colonization and vascular ingress by pathogenic microbes. Antimicrobial NFCs present one approach to prevent microbial colonization over all colonizable surfaces of NFCs, with the advantage of potentially protecting all vulnerable internal and external NFC surfaces.

Methods

This study compared a commercially available silver-coated NFC with a novel minocycline–rifampin–chlorhexidine (MRC)-coated NFC in an in-vitro model posing a severe microbial challenge following 1 and 7 days of elution in a 50% serum solution to simulate clinical use of the NFCs. Microbial challenges were performed against clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans as representative of the major classes of highly virulent bloodstream infectious pathogens.

Results

Results following 1 day of elution showed colonization of uncoated NFCs of 4.45 x 106 colony-forming units (CFU)/NFC for MRSA, 5.20 x 106 CFU/NFC for C. albicans and 3.68 x 107 CFU/NFC for P. aeruginosa. The silver NFC presented approximately a 1 log10 reduction for P. aeruginosa and similar colonization densities as the control for MRSA and C. albicans. In contrast, the MRC NFC showed no colonization by any of the challenge pathogens. Similar results were obtained following 7 days of elution.

Conclusions

The differences between the MRC and silver NFCs were significant (P<0.005). The MRC NFC has potential to reduce line infections, and therefore merits further in-vivo and clinical testing.
银和米诺环素-利福平-氯己定包膜无针连接器的体外抗菌活性比较。
无针连接器(nfc)广泛用于血管输注回路。尽管具有安全益处,但nfc仍然存在病原微生物定植和血管侵入的风险。抗菌NFC提供了一种防止微生物在NFC所有可定植表面上定植的方法,其优势是潜在地保护整个脆弱的内部和外部NFC表面。在这项研究中,我们在体外模型中比较了市售银包被的NFC与新型米诺环素(M)、利福平(R)和氯己定(C)包被的NFC,在50%的血清溶液中洗脱1天和7天,以模拟NFC的临床使用。对临床分离的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐多药铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌进行微生物挑战,作为高毒力血流感染性病原体的主要代表。洗脱1天后的结果显示,未包被的NFC定植量为MRSA为4.45 × 106 CFU/NFC,白色念珠菌为5.20 × 106 CFU/NFC,铜绿假单胞菌为3.68 × 107 CFU/NFC。银NFC对铜绿假单胞菌的感染减少了约1 log10,对MRSA和白色假单胞菌的感染密度与对照相似。相比之下,MRC NFC显示没有任何挑战病原体的定植。经过7天的洗脱,得到了类似的结果。MRC与银NFC的差异有统计学意义(p < 0.005)。MRC NFC有可能减少系感染,因此值得进一步的体内和临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信