Characteristics of Interaction Between Caregivers and Children with Chronic Diseases in Oral Medication-Taking Situations: A Validation Study of the Interaction Rating Scale.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Takuya Yasumoto, Tomoka Yamamoto, Atsuko Ishii, Hiroko Okuno, Haruo Fujino
{"title":"Characteristics of Interaction Between Caregivers and Children with Chronic Diseases in Oral Medication-Taking Situations: A Validation Study of the Interaction Rating Scale.","authors":"Takuya Yasumoto, Tomoka Yamamoto, Atsuko Ishii, Hiroko Okuno, Haruo Fujino","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04099-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Caregiver-child interaction is essential for maintaining adaptive oral medication-taking behavior in children. To evaluate interactive behavior between children and caregivers, the Interaction Rating Scale (IRS), an observation-based instrument for evaluating the quality of caregiver-child interaction, can be applied via observation of interactions. This study examined the applicability of the IRS in oral medication-taking situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six caregiver-child dyads were evaluated using the IRS. The reliability of the measure was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and intra-class coefficient (ICC) for inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability. The concurrent validity was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Parenting Scale and the Social Skills Scale for Preschool Children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IRS total, caregiver, and child scores showed high internal consistency (α = 0.86-0.92), test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.76-0.80) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.86-0.91). The IRS indices were partially associated with the Positive and Negative Parenting Scale and Social Skills Scale scores in the hypothesized directions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results indicated the IRS is a reliable and validated instrument for measuring characteristics of caregiver-child interactions in medication-taking situations. Further studies may be helpful for validating the measure in wider patient groups and investigating the medication behavior of children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04099-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Caregiver-child interaction is essential for maintaining adaptive oral medication-taking behavior in children. To evaluate interactive behavior between children and caregivers, the Interaction Rating Scale (IRS), an observation-based instrument for evaluating the quality of caregiver-child interaction, can be applied via observation of interactions. This study examined the applicability of the IRS in oral medication-taking situations.

Methods: Sixty-six caregiver-child dyads were evaluated using the IRS. The reliability of the measure was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and intra-class coefficient (ICC) for inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability. The concurrent validity was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Parenting Scale and the Social Skills Scale for Preschool Children.

Results: The IRS total, caregiver, and child scores showed high internal consistency (α = 0.86-0.92), test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.76-0.80) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.86-0.91). The IRS indices were partially associated with the Positive and Negative Parenting Scale and Social Skills Scale scores in the hypothesized directions.

Discussion: The results indicated the IRS is a reliable and validated instrument for measuring characteristics of caregiver-child interactions in medication-taking situations. Further studies may be helpful for validating the measure in wider patient groups and investigating the medication behavior of children.

慢性疾病患儿口服服药时照顾者与儿童互动特征:互动评定量表的验证性研究
导读:照顾者与儿童的互动对于维持儿童的适应性口服药物服用行为至关重要。为了评估儿童与照顾者之间的互动行为,互动评定量表(IRS)是一种基于观察的工具,用于评估照顾者与儿童之间的互动质量,可以通过观察互动来应用。本研究考察了IRS在口服药物情况下的适用性。方法:采用IRS对66对照顾者-儿童二人组进行评价。测量的信度采用Cronbach's alpha来评估内部一致性,使用类内系数(ICC)来评估评估者间信度和重测信度。采用《学前儿童积极父母教养量表》、《消极父母教养量表》和《学前儿童社会技能量表》评估其并发效度。结果:IRS总分、照顾者和儿童得分具有较高的内部一致性(α = 0.86 ~ 0.92)、重测信度(ICC = 0.76 ~ 0.80)和评分间信度(ICC = 0.86 ~ 0.91)。在假设的方向上,IRS指数与积极、消极父母教养量表和社交技能量表得分部分相关。讨论:结果表明,IRS是一种可靠和有效的工具,用于测量药物服用情况下照顾者与儿童相互作用的特征。进一步的研究可能有助于在更广泛的患者群体中验证该措施,并调查儿童的用药行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信