Exploring the Landscape of Physician Assistant/Associate-Specific Doctoral Education in the United States: A National Program Survey.

Q2 Health Professions
Aisha N Hussein, Cody A Sasek, Randy D Danielsen, Shaun Horak, Linda Sekhon, Shea A Dempsey, Andrew Stakem, Gerald Kayingo
{"title":"Exploring the Landscape of Physician Assistant/Associate-Specific Doctoral Education in the United States: A National Program Survey.","authors":"Aisha N Hussein, Cody A Sasek, Randy D Danielsen, Shaun Horak, Linda Sekhon, Shea A Dempsey, Andrew Stakem, Gerald Kayingo","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The researchers aimed to examine the characteristics and current state of physician assistant/associate (PA) doctoral programs in the United States through the first comprehensive national survey of such programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey instrument was developed among PA doctoral education consortium members and was piloted with 4 doctoral program directors. Following institutional review board approval, program directors from all identified PA doctoral programs were invited to participate. The survey collected data on program characteristics, organizational structure, curriculum, faculty and student demographics, and attitudes toward potential specialized accreditation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four percent (n = 21) of PA doctoral programs responded. Most programs offered a Doctor of Medical Science degree title (90.5%). Key program goals included developing PA leaders (100%), elevating PA educator faculty skills (71.4%), and enhancing clinical acumen (42.9%). The implementation of these goals varied significantly. Program characteristics demonstrated considerable diversity, including length, structure, concentrations, tuition, and student demographics. The majority of programs (61.9%) expressed reluctance toward participation in national accreditation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study reveals a rapidly growing field characterized by diverse program structures but emerging consistency in degree nomenclature. The findings highlight critical decisions facing PA doctoral education regarding standardization and quality assurance, while demonstrating strong institutional interest in advanced PA education. These results provide a foundation for future research and development in PA doctoral education.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The researchers aimed to examine the characteristics and current state of physician assistant/associate (PA) doctoral programs in the United States through the first comprehensive national survey of such programs.

Methods: The survey instrument was developed among PA doctoral education consortium members and was piloted with 4 doctoral program directors. Following institutional review board approval, program directors from all identified PA doctoral programs were invited to participate. The survey collected data on program characteristics, organizational structure, curriculum, faculty and student demographics, and attitudes toward potential specialized accreditation.

Results: Eighty-four percent (n = 21) of PA doctoral programs responded. Most programs offered a Doctor of Medical Science degree title (90.5%). Key program goals included developing PA leaders (100%), elevating PA educator faculty skills (71.4%), and enhancing clinical acumen (42.9%). The implementation of these goals varied significantly. Program characteristics demonstrated considerable diversity, including length, structure, concentrations, tuition, and student demographics. The majority of programs (61.9%) expressed reluctance toward participation in national accreditation.

Discussion: This study reveals a rapidly growing field characterized by diverse program structures but emerging consistency in degree nomenclature. The findings highlight critical decisions facing PA doctoral education regarding standardization and quality assurance, while demonstrating strong institutional interest in advanced PA education. These results provide a foundation for future research and development in PA doctoral education.

探索美国医师助理/专科博士教育的前景:一项国家项目调查。
简介:研究人员旨在通过对美国医师助理/助理(PA)博士项目的第一次全面的全国调查来研究这些项目的特点和现状。方法:在PA博士教育联盟成员中开发调查工具,并在4名博士项目主任中进行试点。在机构审查委员会批准后,所有确定的PA博士项目的项目主任被邀请参加。该调查收集了项目特点、组织结构、课程、教师和学生人口统计数据,以及对潜在专业认证的态度。结果:84% (n = 21)的PA博士项目做出了回应。大多数课程提供医学博士学位(90.5%)。项目的主要目标包括培养PA领导者(100%),提高PA教育者的技能(71.4%)和提高临床敏锐度(42.9%)。这些目标的执行情况差别很大。项目特点表现出相当大的多样性,包括长度、结构、集中程度、学费和学生人口统计。大多数项目(61.9%)表示不愿意参与国家认证。讨论:这项研究揭示了一个快速发展的领域,其特点是不同的课程结构,但在学位命名法上出现了一致性。研究结果强调了私人助理博士教育在标准化和质量保证方面面临的关键决策,同时表明了机构对高级私人助理教育的强烈兴趣。这些结果为今后的研究和发展提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信