Efficacy of immunotherapy remained in patients with recurrent/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after surgery with or without postoperative thoracic radiotherapy: a bi-center retrospective study.
Yuqi Wu, Renda Li, Fengwei Tan, Jianzhong Cao, Nan Bi
{"title":"Efficacy of immunotherapy remained in patients with recurrent/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after surgery with or without postoperative thoracic radiotherapy: a bi-center retrospective study.","authors":"Yuqi Wu, Renda Li, Fengwei Tan, Jianzhong Cao, Nan Bi","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since mediastinal lymph node dissection and radiotherapy (RT) have potential unclear impacts on pulmonary lymphatic system, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in recurrent/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who previously received radical surgery with or without thoracic RT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data of patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy (2000.1.1-2021.7.2) and received immunotherapy after progression were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy was mainly evaluated based on progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of the ICIs. Toxicity was defined as treatment discontinuation due to immune-related adverse effects (irAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five patients were enrolled in the final cohort and 30 (31.6%) patients received thoracic RT before ICI treatment. ICIs were administered as a first-line systematic treatment in 52.6% of patients. The median follow-up time was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.3-18.7 months). The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% CI 8.5-36.6 months). Six (6.3%) patients had treatment suspended due to irAEs. Patients who received RT had comparable median PFS with the non-RT group (17.0 months vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.16). Similar toxicity rates were observed. Similar mPFS were reported in the stage III subgroup (RT vs. non-RT, 8.10 vs. 8.45 months, p = 0.86) or the subgroup treated by ICIs as primary systematic therapy (RT vs. non-RT, 13.6 vs. 16.1 months, p = 0.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICIs remained effective in recurrent/metastatic NSCLC patients with radical surgery and RT did not significantly compromise therapeutic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Since mediastinal lymph node dissection and radiotherapy (RT) have potential unclear impacts on pulmonary lymphatic system, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in recurrent/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who previously received radical surgery with or without thoracic RT.
Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy (2000.1.1-2021.7.2) and received immunotherapy after progression were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy was mainly evaluated based on progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of the ICIs. Toxicity was defined as treatment discontinuation due to immune-related adverse effects (irAEs).
Results: Ninety-five patients were enrolled in the final cohort and 30 (31.6%) patients received thoracic RT before ICI treatment. ICIs were administered as a first-line systematic treatment in 52.6% of patients. The median follow-up time was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.3-18.7 months). The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% CI 8.5-36.6 months). Six (6.3%) patients had treatment suspended due to irAEs. Patients who received RT had comparable median PFS with the non-RT group (17.0 months vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.16). Similar toxicity rates were observed. Similar mPFS were reported in the stage III subgroup (RT vs. non-RT, 8.10 vs. 8.45 months, p = 0.86) or the subgroup treated by ICIs as primary systematic therapy (RT vs. non-RT, 13.6 vs. 16.1 months, p = 0.45).
Conclusions: ICIs remained effective in recurrent/metastatic NSCLC patients with radical surgery and RT did not significantly compromise therapeutic effects.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.