[Effectiveness of the middle turbinate flap for the treatment of spontaneous fistulas].

Genaro Efraín Hernández-Alatriste, Fernando Torres-Zapiain, Martha Alicia Hernández-González
{"title":"[Effectiveness of the middle turbinate flap for the treatment of spontaneous fistulas].","authors":"Genaro Efraín Hernández-Alatriste, Fernando Torres-Zapiain, Martha Alicia Hernández-González","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15178461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently there is no certainty on which is the best treatment for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of the pedicled middle turbinate flap (PMTF) in the treatment of said fistulas, located in the anterior skull base floor (ASBF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the reduction in recurrence of spontaneous CSF fistulas in the ASBF treated with endoscopic endonasal PMTF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ambispective cohort study which included patients with spontaneous CSF fistulas located in the ASBF, treated with PMTF and nasoseptal flap (NSF) by endoscopic endonasal route in a third-level hospital from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2023. 2 groups were compared: group A, for patients treated with PMTF, and group B, patients treated with NSF. It was calculated chi squared for recurrence, complications and surgical reintervention. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total was of 13 patients. The most frequent cause was spontaneous (9 cases). PMTF was used in 7 cases and NSF in 6. In group A the recurrence was 42%, and in group B 66% (p = 0.38). Only 1 patient in group A underwent reoperation vs. 4 in group B (p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of PMTF has fewer cases of recurrence compared to NSF, even though it was not statistically significant. The statistical significance for reintervention in group A suggests that PMTF may be a viable option for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":"63 3","pages":"e6574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15178461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently there is no certainty on which is the best treatment for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of the pedicled middle turbinate flap (PMTF) in the treatment of said fistulas, located in the anterior skull base floor (ASBF).

Objective: To demonstrate the reduction in recurrence of spontaneous CSF fistulas in the ASBF treated with endoscopic endonasal PMTF.

Material and methods: Ambispective cohort study which included patients with spontaneous CSF fistulas located in the ASBF, treated with PMTF and nasoseptal flap (NSF) by endoscopic endonasal route in a third-level hospital from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2023. 2 groups were compared: group A, for patients treated with PMTF, and group B, patients treated with NSF. It was calculated chi squared for recurrence, complications and surgical reintervention. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The total was of 13 patients. The most frequent cause was spontaneous (9 cases). PMTF was used in 7 cases and NSF in 6. In group A the recurrence was 42%, and in group B 66% (p = 0.38). Only 1 patient in group A underwent reoperation vs. 4 in group B (p = 0.05).

Conclusions: The use of PMTF has fewer cases of recurrence compared to NSF, even though it was not statistically significant. The statistical significance for reintervention in group A suggests that PMTF may be a viable option for these patients.

[中鼻甲皮瓣治疗自发性瘘的疗效]。
背景:目前对于自发性脑脊液瘘管的最佳治疗方法尚无定论。本研究旨在测试带蒂中鼻甲皮瓣(PMTF)治疗上述位于前颅底(ASBF)的瘘的有效性。目的:探讨经鼻内窥镜PMTF治疗自发性脑脊液瘘的复发率。材料与方法:双视角队列研究,纳入某三甲医院2020年3月1日至2023年2月28日经鼻内镜途径行PMTF和鼻中隔皮瓣(NSF)治疗的自发性脑脊液瘘患者。比较两组:A组为PMTF治疗组,B组为NSF治疗组。计算复发、并发症和手术再干预的卡方。p值< 0.05被认为是显著的。结果:共13例。最常见的原因是自发性(9例)。PMTF 7例,NSF 6例。A组复发率为42%,B组为66% (p = 0.38)。A组再手术1例,B组再手术4例(p = 0.05)。结论:与NSF相比,使用PMTF的复发病例更少,尽管没有统计学意义。A组再干预的统计学意义表明PMTF可能是这些患者的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信