The invisible killer: fetal vascular malperfusion in stillbirths without macroscopic cord abnormalities.

IF 4.4 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Laura Avagliano, Francesca Monari, Beatrice Melis, Fabio Facchinetti, Gaetano Bulfamante
{"title":"The invisible killer: fetal vascular malperfusion in stillbirths without macroscopic cord abnormalities.","authors":"Laura Avagliano, Francesca Monari, Beatrice Melis, Fabio Facchinetti, Gaetano Bulfamante","doi":"10.32074/1591-951X-1070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the association between fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) and the umbilical cord characteristics in stillbirth. FVM is a category of placental lesions consistent with restriction/interruption of fetal blood flow, frequently associated with a \"cord accident\". In some stillbirths, gross umbilical cord abnormalities unravel at birth, helping to elucidate the cause of death; however, other cases do not show any structural alterations and therefore these cases do not have an obvious cause of death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective histopathological evaluation of singleton antepartum stillbirths affected by of FVM. Clinical and histopathological findings were compared among cases with or without gross umbilical cord abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and three cases were evaluated. Forty-eight cases (48/103; 46.6%) of stillbirth with FVM showed gross umbilical cord abnormalities, whereas 55/103 cases (53.4%) did not show any gross anomalies. Clinical risk factors for stillbirth were equally distributed between cases. Notably, the main histological lesion observed in cases without gross umbilical cord abnormalities was fatal thrombosis of the fetal vessels along the cord-placental vascular tree. This finding implies that the absence of macroscopic cord anomalies is not a sufficient criterion to exclude reduction/interruption of fetal blood flow and cord accidents as a potential cause of stillbirth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowing the cause of fetal death is paramount both for bereaved parents and clinicians, helping in stillbirth acceptance and future prevention strategies. Our findings show the occurrence of FVM in cases without macroscopic umbilical cord anomalies. Therefore, an in-depth placental histopathological examination is mandatory to unravel signs of fetal blood flow obstruction in cases in which umbilical cord looks grossly normal. This knowledge helps parents, and health care providers in the real identification of the pathogenesis of fetal death, as the first step for personalized future actions of stillbirth prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":45893,"journal":{"name":"PATHOLOGICA","volume":"117 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATHOLOGICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32074/1591-951X-1070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the association between fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) and the umbilical cord characteristics in stillbirth. FVM is a category of placental lesions consistent with restriction/interruption of fetal blood flow, frequently associated with a "cord accident". In some stillbirths, gross umbilical cord abnormalities unravel at birth, helping to elucidate the cause of death; however, other cases do not show any structural alterations and therefore these cases do not have an obvious cause of death.

Methods: Retrospective histopathological evaluation of singleton antepartum stillbirths affected by of FVM. Clinical and histopathological findings were compared among cases with or without gross umbilical cord abnormalities.

Results: One hundred and three cases were evaluated. Forty-eight cases (48/103; 46.6%) of stillbirth with FVM showed gross umbilical cord abnormalities, whereas 55/103 cases (53.4%) did not show any gross anomalies. Clinical risk factors for stillbirth were equally distributed between cases. Notably, the main histological lesion observed in cases without gross umbilical cord abnormalities was fatal thrombosis of the fetal vessels along the cord-placental vascular tree. This finding implies that the absence of macroscopic cord anomalies is not a sufficient criterion to exclude reduction/interruption of fetal blood flow and cord accidents as a potential cause of stillbirth.

Conclusion: Knowing the cause of fetal death is paramount both for bereaved parents and clinicians, helping in stillbirth acceptance and future prevention strategies. Our findings show the occurrence of FVM in cases without macroscopic umbilical cord anomalies. Therefore, an in-depth placental histopathological examination is mandatory to unravel signs of fetal blood flow obstruction in cases in which umbilical cord looks grossly normal. This knowledge helps parents, and health care providers in the real identification of the pathogenesis of fetal death, as the first step for personalized future actions of stillbirth prevention.

看不见的杀手:无肉眼脐带异常的死产胎儿血管灌注不良。
目的:探讨胎儿血管灌注不良(FVM)与死产脐带特征的关系。FVM是一类胎盘病变,与胎儿血流受限/中断一致,常与“脐带意外”相关。在一些死产中,脐带总异常在出生时解开,有助于阐明死亡原因;然而,其他病例没有显示任何结构改变,因此这些病例没有明显的死亡原因。方法:对FVM所致单胎产前死产进行回顾性组织病理学评价。临床和组织病理学结果比较的情况下,有或没有大体脐带异常。结果:对103例进行了评价。48例(48/103;46.6%的死产伴FVM表现为脐带大体异常,而55/103例(53.4%)未表现出任何大体异常。死产的临床危险因素在病例之间分布均匀。值得注意的是,在没有明显脐带异常的病例中,观察到的主要组织学病变是胎儿血管沿脐带-胎盘血管树的致命血栓形成。这一发现表明,没有宏观脐带异常并不能作为排除胎儿血流减少/中断和脐带意外作为死产的潜在原因的充分标准。结论:了解胎儿死亡的原因对失去亲人的父母和临床医生来说都是至关重要的,这有助于死产的接受和未来的预防策略。我们的研究结果表明,在没有肉眼脐带异常的情况下发生FVM。因此,深入的胎盘组织病理学检查是强制性的,以揭示胎儿血流阻塞的迹象,在脐带看起来非常正常的情况下。这些知识有助于父母和卫生保健提供者真正识别胎儿死亡的发病机制,作为未来个性化死产预防行动的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PATHOLOGICA
PATHOLOGICA PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信