A systematic review of geographic differences in knee phenotypes based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Guanghui Zhao, Chengyuan Ma, Zifan Luo, Jianbing Ma, Jianpeng Wang
{"title":"A systematic review of geographic differences in knee phenotypes based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification.","authors":"Guanghui Zhao, Chengyuan Ma, Zifan Luo, Jianbing Ma, Jianpeng Wang","doi":"10.1186/s42836-025-00311-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent of geographic variation in knee phenotypes remains insufficiently documented. This systematic review intends to elucidate the regional disparities in the distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types across different geographic areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting the distribution of knee phenotypes, as classified by the CPAK system, in both healthy and arthritic populations, were included in the analysis. Based on the methods in the literature, the Hoy Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. To compare geographical differences in CPAK types among patients with arthritis, as well as healthy people.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 studies (28 retrospective and 1 prospective) were included in this review, encompassing 27,660 knees in 22,342 subjects. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Hoy Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality was good. Among the healthy knees (n = 4,082), CPAK type II was predominant in Europe (41.7%) and Asia (36.7%). In contrast, among arthritic knees (n = 21,632), CPAK type I was most common in Asia (51.3%), North America (32.8%), and Europe (32.8%), while CPAK type II was prevalent in Australia (29.3%) and Africa (25.5%). Notably, the proportions of CPAK type I (P < 0.001) and II (P = 0.002) knees varied significantly across different geographic regions among arthritic knees, while no significant differences were observed among healthy knees (P = 0.48, P = 0.305).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variations in CPAK distributions among arthritic knees were observed across countries, while no significant differences were observed among healthy knees. Surgeons in different regions need to make individual surgical plans according to the CPAK types of patients. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"7 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-025-00311-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The extent of geographic variation in knee phenotypes remains insufficiently documented. This systematic review intends to elucidate the regional disparities in the distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types across different geographic areas.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting the distribution of knee phenotypes, as classified by the CPAK system, in both healthy and arthritic populations, were included in the analysis. Based on the methods in the literature, the Hoy Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. To compare geographical differences in CPAK types among patients with arthritis, as well as healthy people.

Results: A total of 29 studies (28 retrospective and 1 prospective) were included in this review, encompassing 27,660 knees in 22,342 subjects. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Hoy Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality was good. Among the healthy knees (n = 4,082), CPAK type II was predominant in Europe (41.7%) and Asia (36.7%). In contrast, among arthritic knees (n = 21,632), CPAK type I was most common in Asia (51.3%), North America (32.8%), and Europe (32.8%), while CPAK type II was prevalent in Australia (29.3%) and Africa (25.5%). Notably, the proportions of CPAK type I (P < 0.001) and II (P = 0.002) knees varied significantly across different geographic regions among arthritic knees, while no significant differences were observed among healthy knees (P = 0.48, P = 0.305).

Conclusion: Significant variations in CPAK distributions among arthritic knees were observed across countries, while no significant differences were observed among healthy knees. Surgeons in different regions need to make individual surgical plans according to the CPAK types of patients. Video Abstract.

基于膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类的膝关节表型地理差异的系统回顾。
背景:膝关节表型的地理变异程度仍然没有充分的文献记录。本系统综述旨在阐明膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)类型在不同地理区域的分布差异。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南对文献进行系统评价。研究报告的膝关节表型分布,如CPAK系统分类,在健康和关节炎人群,包括在分析中。基于文献中的方法,使用Hoy偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。比较关节炎患者和健康人在CPAK类型上的地理差异。结果:本综述共纳入29项研究(28项回顾性研究和1项前瞻性研究),涉及22,342名受试者的27,660个膝关节。使用Hoy风险偏倚工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量,质量良好。在健康膝关节(n = 4082)中,CPAK II型在欧洲(41.7%)和亚洲(36.7%)占主导地位。相比之下,在关节炎膝关节(n = 21,632)中,CPAK I型在亚洲(51.3%)、北美(32.8%)和欧洲(32.8%)最为常见,而CPAK II型在澳大利亚(29.3%)和非洲(25.5%)最为常见。结论:不同国家患关节炎膝关节的CPAK分布有显著差异,而健康膝关节的CPAK分布无显著差异。不同地区的外科医生需要根据患者的CPAK类型制定个性化的手术方案。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信