Mengyi Wei, Michael Todd, Aimee N C Campbell, Darwyn Chern, Eric Lott, Mary J Whitfield, Nick Stavros, Elise Greenberg, Adela Grando
{"title":"Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing.","authors":"Mengyi Wei, Michael Todd, Aimee N C Campbell, Darwyn Chern, Eric Lott, Mary J Whitfield, Nick Stavros, Elise Greenberg, Adela Grando","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22040617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing substance use disorder (SUD) data is essential for advancing equitable healthcare and improving outcomes for marginalized populations. However, concerns about privacy, stigma, and adherence to data privacy regulations often hinder effective data sharing. This study explores patient preferences and considerations related to sharing SUD-related medical records, with a focus on the sociocultural and systemic factors that shape their willingness to share.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 357 adult patients from four community-based clinics in Arizona participated in a cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey assessed sociodemographic factors, experiences of stigma (self-directed, anticipated, and provider-based), trust in healthcare providers, satisfaction with care, and willingness to share SUD data across various scenarios. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and one-way ANOVA to uncover key associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients identified SUD history, diagnoses, and treatment information as particularly sensitive. Stigma was significantly correlated with increased sensitivity and reduced willingness to share data, especially with providers outside their primary facility (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast, trust in providers and higher satisfaction with care were linked to greater willingness to share data with all providers (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Patients were more inclined to share SUD data during emergencies or for direct treatment purposes than for administrative or research applications (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings underscore the ethical imperative to address stigma and foster trust to promote equitable SUD data sharing. Policies must empower patients with control over sensitive health information while ensuring cultural competence and fairness in care delivery. Ensuring that patients feel confident in how their data are used may encourage greater participation in health information exchange, ultimately supporting more effective and individualized SUD care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sharing substance use disorder (SUD) data is essential for advancing equitable healthcare and improving outcomes for marginalized populations. However, concerns about privacy, stigma, and adherence to data privacy regulations often hinder effective data sharing. This study explores patient preferences and considerations related to sharing SUD-related medical records, with a focus on the sociocultural and systemic factors that shape their willingness to share.
Methods: A total of 357 adult patients from four community-based clinics in Arizona participated in a cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey assessed sociodemographic factors, experiences of stigma (self-directed, anticipated, and provider-based), trust in healthcare providers, satisfaction with care, and willingness to share SUD data across various scenarios. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and one-way ANOVA to uncover key associations.
Results: Patients identified SUD history, diagnoses, and treatment information as particularly sensitive. Stigma was significantly correlated with increased sensitivity and reduced willingness to share data, especially with providers outside their primary facility (p < 0.001). In contrast, trust in providers and higher satisfaction with care were linked to greater willingness to share data with all providers (p < 0.01). Patients were more inclined to share SUD data during emergencies or for direct treatment purposes than for administrative or research applications (p < 0.001).
Discussion: These findings underscore the ethical imperative to address stigma and foster trust to promote equitable SUD data sharing. Policies must empower patients with control over sensitive health information while ensuring cultural competence and fairness in care delivery. Ensuring that patients feel confident in how their data are used may encourage greater participation in health information exchange, ultimately supporting more effective and individualized SUD care.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health.
The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.