Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018-2024).

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Edoardo Poggi, Francisco J Pérez Duarte, Juan Andrés Villagómez Herrera, Carlos Andrés Hernández López, David Garcia Rubio, Jorge Gutiérrez Del Sol, Francesca Izzo, Angelo Tapia-Araya, Francesco Piana
{"title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018-2024).","authors":"Edoardo Poggi, Francisco J Pérez Duarte, Juan Andrés Villagómez Herrera, Carlos Andrés Hernández López, David Garcia Rubio, Jorge Gutiérrez Del Sol, Francesca Izzo, Angelo Tapia-Araya, Francesco Piana","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the surgical technique, indications and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in cats and to report the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 22 client-owned cats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of cats that underwent LC between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed. Data collected included signalment, clinical signs, laparoscopic approach, concomitant surgical procedures, number of portals, instrument type used for ligation of the cystic duct, operating time, complications and clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 3- or 4-port technique was used in 16 and six cats, respectively. The cystic duct ligation was performed with Hemoclips (n = 14) or with Hem-o-lok (n = 8). The devices used for gallbladder dissection included harmonic scalpel (n = 5), Ligasure (n = 14) and monopolar j-hook (n = 3). The procedure was successfully performed without conversion to open laparotomy in all cases. The median operating time was 41 min. Postoperative complications occurred in three cats: one was treated medically, one spontaneously resolved without intervention and the third cat died 3 days after surgery due to extra hepatic biliary duct obstruction (EHBDO). The final follow-up time for the 21 cases that survived to discharge ranged between 48 and 321 days (median 159 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC was performed successfully using a 3- or 4-port technique in all cases. LC was associated with a low complication rate and a good clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>LC may be considered as an alternative to open cholecystectomy in cats with gallbladder disease that do not present with biochemical or imaging evidence of EHBDO or biliary tract rupture.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the surgical technique, indications and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in cats and to report the clinical outcomes.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Animals: A total of 22 client-owned cats.

Methods: Medical records of cats that underwent LC between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed. Data collected included signalment, clinical signs, laparoscopic approach, concomitant surgical procedures, number of portals, instrument type used for ligation of the cystic duct, operating time, complications and clinical outcome.

Results: A 3- or 4-port technique was used in 16 and six cats, respectively. The cystic duct ligation was performed with Hemoclips (n = 14) or with Hem-o-lok (n = 8). The devices used for gallbladder dissection included harmonic scalpel (n = 5), Ligasure (n = 14) and monopolar j-hook (n = 3). The procedure was successfully performed without conversion to open laparotomy in all cases. The median operating time was 41 min. Postoperative complications occurred in three cats: one was treated medically, one spontaneously resolved without intervention and the third cat died 3 days after surgery due to extra hepatic biliary duct obstruction (EHBDO). The final follow-up time for the 21 cases that survived to discharge ranged between 48 and 321 days (median 159 days).

Conclusion: LC was performed successfully using a 3- or 4-port technique in all cases. LC was associated with a low complication rate and a good clinical outcome.

Clinical significance: LC may be considered as an alternative to open cholecystectomy in cats with gallbladder disease that do not present with biochemical or imaging evidence of EHBDO or biliary tract rupture.

22只猫腹腔镜胆囊切除术(2018-2024)
目的:探讨猫腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术技巧、适应证及并发症,并报告其临床效果。研究设计:回顾性研究。动物:共有22只客户拥有的猫。方法:回顾2018年至2024年间接受LC治疗的猫的医疗记录。收集的资料包括信号、临床体征、腹腔镜入路、伴随手术程序、门静脉数量、结扎囊管所用器械类型、手术时间、并发症和临床结果。结果:在16只猫和6只猫中分别使用了3口或4口技术。使用hemclips (n = 14)或Hem-o-lok (n = 8)进行囊管结扎。用于胆囊清扫的器械包括谐波手术刀(n = 5)、Ligasure (n = 14)和单极j钩(n = 3)。所有病例均成功完成手术,未转开腹手术。中位手术时间41 min。3只猫出现术后并发症:1只接受药物治疗,1只不经干预自行消退,3只猫因肝外胆管梗阻(EHBDO)术后3天死亡。21例存活至出院的最终随访时间为48 ~ 321天(中位159天)。结论:所有病例均采用3口或4口技术行LC。LC与低并发症发生率和良好的临床结果相关。临床意义:对于没有EHBDO或胆道破裂的生化或影像学证据的胆囊疾病猫,LC可被视为开放胆囊切除术的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信