[INCORPORATING INTRAOPERATIVE DIGITALIZATION SOFTWARE IN ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA: REDUCING OPERATIVE TIME IN PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE FIXATION].

Harefuah Pub Date : 2025-04-01
Guy Feldman, Nadav Bandel, Ram Mosheiff, Amit Davidson, Yoram Weil, Mahmoud Jamal, Nimrod Rozen, Meir Libergall
{"title":"[INCORPORATING INTRAOPERATIVE DIGITALIZATION SOFTWARE IN ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA: REDUCING OPERATIVE TIME IN PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE FIXATION].","authors":"Guy Feldman, Nadav Bandel, Ram Mosheiff, Amit Davidson, Yoram Weil, Mahmoud Jamal, Nimrod Rozen, Meir Libergall","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Integration of an intraoperative digitalization tool aims to improve daily work in the operating room by improving communication between staff members, patient safety and creating a database for future research.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effect of intraoperative digitalization tools on total operative time, procedure standardization and fluoroscopy use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined patients with pertrochanteric fracture, treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with a short cephalomedullary nail using the Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA). The surgical protocol was displayed on a screen and controlled by a foot pedal. The data collected included the total surgical time and the amount of radiation emitted in millisievert (mSv). The cases were divided into four groups in a chronological fashion according to yearly quarters. The total operative time was compared to the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty operations were performed, forty-four by competent surgeons and 16 by expert surgeons. The average procedure time was 59.66 minutes. A decrease in operative time was observed for all surgeons (reduction of 2.27 minutes per month, p=0.0232, and reduction of 1.71 minutes per month, p=0.0093, for expert and competent surgeons, respectively). No difference was observed after standardization (p=0.201). Average operative time of group 4, which included the cases operated during the latest period (n=15) was 42.37 minutes, below the value accepted in the literature of 60.62 minutes (p=0.00117). Fluoroscopy use averaged 7.14 mSv, showing no change (p=0.414).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although digitalization led to decreased operative time, no improvement was observed after standardization. This was attributed to the small sample size.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation of an intraoperative digitalization tool showed reduction in operative time for all surgeons, with no reduction in the use of fluoroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"164 4","pages":"229-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Integration of an intraoperative digitalization tool aims to improve daily work in the operating room by improving communication between staff members, patient safety and creating a database for future research.

Aims: To evaluate the effect of intraoperative digitalization tools on total operative time, procedure standardization and fluoroscopy use.

Methods: This retrospective study examined patients with pertrochanteric fracture, treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with a short cephalomedullary nail using the Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA). The surgical protocol was displayed on a screen and controlled by a foot pedal. The data collected included the total surgical time and the amount of radiation emitted in millisievert (mSv). The cases were divided into four groups in a chronological fashion according to yearly quarters. The total operative time was compared to the literature.

Results: Sixty operations were performed, forty-four by competent surgeons and 16 by expert surgeons. The average procedure time was 59.66 minutes. A decrease in operative time was observed for all surgeons (reduction of 2.27 minutes per month, p=0.0232, and reduction of 1.71 minutes per month, p=0.0093, for expert and competent surgeons, respectively). No difference was observed after standardization (p=0.201). Average operative time of group 4, which included the cases operated during the latest period (n=15) was 42.37 minutes, below the value accepted in the literature of 60.62 minutes (p=0.00117). Fluoroscopy use averaged 7.14 mSv, showing no change (p=0.414).

Conclusions: Although digitalization led to decreased operative time, no improvement was observed after standardization. This was attributed to the small sample size.

Discussion: Implementation of an intraoperative digitalization tool showed reduction in operative time for all surgeons, with no reduction in the use of fluoroscopy.

[术中数字化软件应用于骨科创伤:减少股骨粗隆骨折固定手术时间]。
前言:术中数字化工具的集成旨在通过改善工作人员之间的沟通,患者的安全以及为未来的研究创建数据库来改善手术室的日常工作。目的:评价术中数字化工具对总手术时间、程序标准化和透视使用的影响。方法:回顾性研究股骨粗隆骨折患者,采用股骨近端钉系统(TFNA)进行闭合复位和短头髓内固定治疗。手术方案显示在屏幕上,由脚踏板控制。收集的数据包括手术总时间和以毫西弗(mSv)为单位的辐射量。这些案例按照年度季度的时间顺序分为四组。将总手术时间与文献进行比较。结果:手术60例,熟练手术44例,专家手术16例。平均手术时间为59.66分钟。所有外科医生的手术时间均有所减少(专家和合格外科医生每月分别减少2.27分钟,p=0.0232,每月减少1.71分钟,p=0.0093)。标准化后差异无统计学意义(p=0.201)。第4组(n=15)平均手术时间为42.37 min,低于文献接受值60.62 min (p=0.00117)。透视平均使用7.14毫西弗,没有变化(p=0.414)。结论:虽然数字化缩短了手术时间,但标准化后无明显改善。这是由于样本量小。讨论:术中数字化工具的实施减少了所有外科医生的手术时间,但没有减少透视的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信