Determinants of Limiting Life-Sustaining Treatment in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study in Korean ICUs.

IF 2.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
I Re Heo, Tae Hoon Kim, Won Jai Jung, Gil Myeong Seong, Sun Jung Kwon, Jae Young Moon, Song-I Lee, Do Sik Moon, Tae-Ok Kim, Chul Park, Eun Young Choi, Jung-Wan Yoo, Sunghoon Park, Ae Rin Baek, Sung Yoon Lim, Jung Soo Kim, Jongmin Lee, Chi Ryang Chung, Sang-Min Lee, Su Hwan Lee, Moon Seong Baek, Jin Won Huh, Woo Hyun Cho, Ho Cheol Kim
{"title":"Determinants of Limiting Life-Sustaining Treatment in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study in Korean ICUs.","authors":"I Re Heo, Tae Hoon Kim, Won Jai Jung, Gil Myeong Seong, Sun Jung Kwon, Jae Young Moon, Song-I Lee, Do Sik Moon, Tae-Ok Kim, Chul Park, Eun Young Choi, Jung-Wan Yoo, Sunghoon Park, Ae Rin Baek, Sung Yoon Lim, Jung Soo Kim, Jongmin Lee, Chi Ryang Chung, Sang-Min Lee, Su Hwan Lee, Moon Seong Baek, Jin Won Huh, Woo Hyun Cho, Ho Cheol Kim","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains limited. This study aimed to identify factors influencing LST decisions and compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without LST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,081 COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs across Korea from January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Patients were divided into LST and non-LST groups. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,081 patients, 207 (19.2%) received LST. LST patients were older (median age: 76 vs. 67 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (85.5% vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001), particularly cardiovascular and chronic lung disease. They had higher BUN, lower albumin, and elevated D-dimer levels (all p < 0.05). ICU interventions, including mechanical ventilation (82.6% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001) and ECMO (18.8% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001), were more common. ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in LST patients (82.6% and 94.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified age (OR = 1.054 per year, p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.789, p = 0.002), and ECMO use (OR = 3.580, p = 0.002) as independent predictors of LST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age, comorbidities, and ICU interventions significantly influence LST decisions, highlighting the need for ethical and evidence-based critical care guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2024.0137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains limited. This study aimed to identify factors influencing LST decisions and compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without LST.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,081 COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs across Korea from January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Patients were divided into LST and non-LST groups. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and compared.

Results: Of 1,081 patients, 207 (19.2%) received LST. LST patients were older (median age: 76 vs. 67 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (85.5% vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001), particularly cardiovascular and chronic lung disease. They had higher BUN, lower albumin, and elevated D-dimer levels (all p < 0.05). ICU interventions, including mechanical ventilation (82.6% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001) and ECMO (18.8% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001), were more common. ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in LST patients (82.6% and 94.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified age (OR = 1.054 per year, p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.789, p = 0.002), and ECMO use (OR = 3.580, p = 0.002) as independent predictors of LST.

Conclusion: Age, comorbidities, and ICU interventions significantly influence LST decisions, highlighting the need for ethical and evidence-based critical care guidelines.

限制COVID-19危重患者维持生命治疗的决定因素:韩国icu的多中心研究
背景:对COVID-19危重患者维持生命治疗(LST)决策的了解仍然有限。本研究旨在确定影响LST决定的因素,并比较LST患者和非LST患者的临床结果。方法:本多中心回顾性队列研究分析了2020年1月1日至2021年8月31日全国1081例新冠肺炎icu患者的数据。患者分为LST组和非LST组。收集并比较人口学、临床和结局数据。结果:1081例患者中,207例(19.2%)接受了LST治疗。LST患者年龄较大(中位年龄:76岁对67岁,p < 0.001),合并症较多(85.5%对70.4%,p < 0.001),特别是心血管和慢性肺部疾病。BUN升高,白蛋白降低,d -二聚体升高(p < 0.05)。ICU干预更常见,包括机械通气(82.6% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001)和ECMO (18.8% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001)。LST患者的ICU死亡率和住院死亡率均显著高于LST患者(分别为82.6%和94.2%,p < 0.001)。Logistic回归发现年龄(OR = 1.054 /年,p < 0.001)、机械通气(OR = 2.789, p = 0.002)和ECMO使用(OR = 3.580, p = 0.002)是LST的独立预测因子。结论:年龄、合并症和ICU干预措施显著影响LST的决定,强调了道德和循证重症监护指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信