Artificial intelligence-assisted left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a RESUS-AMI trial sub-analysis.

Demeke Mekonnen, Ernest Spitzer, Eugene P McFadden, Noel M Caplice, Claire B Ren
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-assisted left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a RESUS-AMI trial sub-analysis.","authors":"Demeke Mekonnen, Ernest Spitzer, Eugene P McFadden, Noel M Caplice, Claire B Ren","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03409-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this sub-analysis of the RESUS-AMI trial was to evaluate the correlation of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessments with infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The reproducibility of GLS and other echocardiographic parameters derived with the AI-assisted software were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post-hoc imaging sub-analysis of the RESUS-AMI trial. Echocardiographic LVEF, volumes and GLS were measured with AI-assisted software (CAAS Qardia 2.0) using automated and semi-automated methods. The CMR LVEF, LV dimensions and infarct size were obtained from a CMR core lab with an off-line workstation (CAAS MRV 4.1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 169 echocardiograms were analysed and the GLS showed moderate correlation with the CMR infarct size (r = 0.58 automated and 0.64 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) and LVEF (r=-0.63 automated and - 0.65 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) from 81 CMR recordings. GLS also showed moderate correlation with the LVEF (r= -0.51 automated and - 0.67 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) from echocardiography. The inter-observer reproducibility was excellent in GLS from both the automated (intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.94, bias = 0.08, limit of agreement (LOA) = 1.75) and semi-automated analysis (ICC = 0.93, bias=-0.68, LOA = 1.44). The intra-observer reproducibility was excellent in all echocardiographic measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GLS derived from the AI-assisted software (automated or semi-automated) could be used as a marker of LV systolic function as it correlates well the infarct size and LVEF assessed with CMR and LVEF with echocardiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03409-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this sub-analysis of the RESUS-AMI trial was to evaluate the correlation of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessments with infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The reproducibility of GLS and other echocardiographic parameters derived with the AI-assisted software were also assessed.

Methods: This is a post-hoc imaging sub-analysis of the RESUS-AMI trial. Echocardiographic LVEF, volumes and GLS were measured with AI-assisted software (CAAS Qardia 2.0) using automated and semi-automated methods. The CMR LVEF, LV dimensions and infarct size were obtained from a CMR core lab with an off-line workstation (CAAS MRV 4.1).

Results: In total 169 echocardiograms were analysed and the GLS showed moderate correlation with the CMR infarct size (r = 0.58 automated and 0.64 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) and LVEF (r=-0.63 automated and - 0.65 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) from 81 CMR recordings. GLS also showed moderate correlation with the LVEF (r= -0.51 automated and - 0.67 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) from echocardiography. The inter-observer reproducibility was excellent in GLS from both the automated (intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.94, bias = 0.08, limit of agreement (LOA) = 1.75) and semi-automated analysis (ICC = 0.93, bias=-0.68, LOA = 1.44). The intra-observer reproducibility was excellent in all echocardiographic measurements.

Conclusion: GLS derived from the AI-assisted software (automated or semi-automated) could be used as a marker of LV systolic function as it correlates well the infarct size and LVEF assessed with CMR and LVEF with echocardiography.

人工智能辅助急性心肌梗死患者左心室整体纵向应变评估:一项resu - ami试验亚分析。
目的:这项RESUS-AMI试验亚分析的目的是评估人工智能(AI)辅助超声心动图整体纵向应变(GLS)评估与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死患者梗死面积、左室射血分数(LVEF)和心脏磁共振(CMR)成像体积的相关性。还评估了人工智能辅助软件获得的GLS和其他超声心动图参数的可重复性。方法:这是RESUS-AMI试验的事后影像学亚分析。采用人工智能辅助软件(CAAS Qardia 2.0)采用自动化和半自动方法测量超声心动图LVEF、容积和GLS。CMR LVEF、左室尺寸和梗死面积由CMR核心实验室通过离线工作站获得(CAAS MRV 4.1)。结果:共分析了169张超声心动图,GLS与CMR梗死面积呈中等相关性(自动r = 0.58,半自动r = 0.64,均为p结论:人工智能辅助软件(自动或半自动)得出的GLS可作为左室收缩功能的标志,因为它与CMR评估的梗死面积和LVEF以及超声心动图评估的LVEF具有良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信