Diagnosing adenomyosis using transvaginal ultrasound in current practice: A scoping review and service evaluation.

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dawn Smith, Gareth Bolton
{"title":"Diagnosing adenomyosis using transvaginal ultrasound in current practice: A scoping review and service evaluation.","authors":"Dawn Smith, Gareth Bolton","doi":"10.1177/1742271X251338147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A departmental audit identified a case of adenomyosis which had not been reported, highlighting the need to assess whether the current service provision is adequate in identifying patients with (possible) adenomyosis and how improvements in this part of the service could be made.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether sonographers are effectively identifying and reporting adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A scoping review and retrospective service evaluation was undertaken which included (<i>n</i> = 79) adult female premenopausal patients with symptoms of adenomyosis who had undergone a transvaginal ultrasound scan during the first quarter of 2023. Patients were identified using the CRIS statistic module according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All data were anonymised and collated to include the patient age, referral information (symptoms), scan report and sonographer. The scan report and archived images were evaluated using the sonographic signs identified by the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group (Harmsen et al., 2022) and then compared to the original report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21.5% (<i>n</i> = 17) of patients had signs of adenomyosis on image review, but only 23.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) of these were reported as such. The majority (<i>n</i> = 8) of unidentified cases were reported as having a 'heterogeneous myometrium'. Inter-rater agreement ranged from 50% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most ultrasonic diagnoses of adenomyosis were not identified in our service which is likely due to a lack of internationally agreed criteria for ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis preventing adequate reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23440,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":"1742271X251338147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X251338147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A departmental audit identified a case of adenomyosis which had not been reported, highlighting the need to assess whether the current service provision is adequate in identifying patients with (possible) adenomyosis and how improvements in this part of the service could be made.

Aim: To assess whether sonographers are effectively identifying and reporting adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasound.

Methodology: A scoping review and retrospective service evaluation was undertaken which included (n = 79) adult female premenopausal patients with symptoms of adenomyosis who had undergone a transvaginal ultrasound scan during the first quarter of 2023. Patients were identified using the CRIS statistic module according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All data were anonymised and collated to include the patient age, referral information (symptoms), scan report and sonographer. The scan report and archived images were evaluated using the sonographic signs identified by the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group (Harmsen et al., 2022) and then compared to the original report.

Results: In total, 21.5% (n = 17) of patients had signs of adenomyosis on image review, but only 23.5% (n = 4) of these were reported as such. The majority (n = 8) of unidentified cases were reported as having a 'heterogeneous myometrium'. Inter-rater agreement ranged from 50% to 100%.

Conclusion: Most ultrasonic diagnoses of adenomyosis were not identified in our service which is likely due to a lack of internationally agreed criteria for ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis preventing adequate reporting.

目前应用阴道超声诊断子宫腺肌症:范围回顾和服务评价。
背景:一项部门审计发现一宗未有报告的bbb病例,突显有需要评估目前的服务是否足以识别(可能的)bbb患者,以及如何改善这部分服务。目的:评价超声医师在经阴道超声检查中是否能有效识别和报告子宫腺肌症。方法:进行了范围审查和回顾性服务评估,其中包括(n = 79)在2023年第一季度接受经阴道超声扫描的有子宫腺肌症症状的绝经前成年女性患者。根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准,使用CRIS统计模块对患者进行识别。所有资料均匿名整理,包括患者年龄、转诊信息(症状)、扫描报告和超声医师。使用子宫形态超声评估小组(Harmsen et al., 2022)确定的超声征象对扫描报告和存档图像进行评估,然后与原始报告进行比较。结果:21.5% (n = 17)的患者在影像学检查中有子宫腺肌症征象,但仅有23.5% (n = 4)的患者报告有子宫腺肌症征象。大多数(n = 8)不明病例被报道为“异质肌层”。评级机构间的协议从50%到100%不等。结论:大多数bbb的超声诊断在我们的服务中没有被发现,这可能是由于缺乏国际上一致的子宫腺肌症超声诊断标准而无法充分报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound
Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Ultrasound is the official journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), a multidisciplinary, charitable society comprising radiologists, obstetricians, sonographers, physicists and veterinarians amongst others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信