Experiences of cross-sectoral collaboration between social security service and healthcare service for patients with chronic pain - a qualitative study.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0057
Maryam Haghshenas, Aslak Steinsbekk, Karen Walseth Hara
{"title":"Experiences of cross-sectoral collaboration between social security service and healthcare service for patients with chronic pain - a qualitative study.","authors":"Maryam Haghshenas, Aslak Steinsbekk, Karen Walseth Hara","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with chronic pain need healthcare services for pain management. Many also require social security services due to potential negative influence of chronic pain on social and work-related issues. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the experiences of taking part in cross-sectoral collaborative meetings between social security service and healthcare service for chronic pain patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews with 15 informants, including healthcare providers, patients, and social security supervisors who had taken part in 8 different meetings, was conducted. The focus of the interviews was how the informants experienced cross-sectoral collaborative meetings. The data were analyzed following the systematic text condensation method, including the steps of total impression, identifying meaning units, condensation, and synthesizing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings were categorized into four themes: \"Joining the meeting with preconceptions,\" which showed how some informants experienced that negative preconceptions toward the social security service were addressed in the cross-sectoral collaborative meetings and solved in some cases. \"Get to know each other,\" which highlighted that the meetings provided opportunities for participants to increase their knowledge about the involved actors. \"Access to detailed health information?\" indicated that although concerns about whether sensitive health information should be shared with social security supervisors were raised by healthcare providers, the supervisors found this issue to be less concerning. Finally, \"Who has the final word?\", which showed that unclarity over decision-making processes during the meetings was experienced to create disagreement between participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The informants experienced that cross-sectoral collaborative meetings between patients, social security supervisors, and healthcare providers, while challenging, can play a significant role in managing the needs of patients with chronic pain. The study highlights the need for clarification over the roles of the actors and a jointly agreed-upon agenda for the meetings to ensure effective collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with chronic pain need healthcare services for pain management. Many also require social security services due to potential negative influence of chronic pain on social and work-related issues. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the experiences of taking part in cross-sectoral collaborative meetings between social security service and healthcare service for chronic pain patients.

Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews with 15 informants, including healthcare providers, patients, and social security supervisors who had taken part in 8 different meetings, was conducted. The focus of the interviews was how the informants experienced cross-sectoral collaborative meetings. The data were analyzed following the systematic text condensation method, including the steps of total impression, identifying meaning units, condensation, and synthesizing.

Results: The findings were categorized into four themes: "Joining the meeting with preconceptions," which showed how some informants experienced that negative preconceptions toward the social security service were addressed in the cross-sectoral collaborative meetings and solved in some cases. "Get to know each other," which highlighted that the meetings provided opportunities for participants to increase their knowledge about the involved actors. "Access to detailed health information?" indicated that although concerns about whether sensitive health information should be shared with social security supervisors were raised by healthcare providers, the supervisors found this issue to be less concerning. Finally, "Who has the final word?", which showed that unclarity over decision-making processes during the meetings was experienced to create disagreement between participants.

Conclusions: The informants experienced that cross-sectoral collaborative meetings between patients, social security supervisors, and healthcare providers, while challenging, can play a significant role in managing the needs of patients with chronic pain. The study highlights the need for clarification over the roles of the actors and a jointly agreed-upon agenda for the meetings to ensure effective collaboration.

慢性疼痛患者社会保障服务与医疗服务跨部门合作的经验——一项定性研究。
目的:慢性疼痛患者需要医疗保健服务进行疼痛管理。由于慢性疼痛对社会和工作相关问题的潜在负面影响,许多人还需要社会保障服务。因此,本研究旨在探讨慢性疼痛患者参加社会保障服务与医疗服务跨部门合作会议的经验。方法:采用半结构化的个人访谈,对参加8次不同会议的15名举报人进行定性研究,其中包括医疗保健提供者、患者和社会保障监督员。访谈的重点是举报人如何经历跨部门协作会议。采用系统的文本凝聚方法对数据进行分析,包括总印象、识别意义单位、凝聚和合成步骤。结果:调查结果分为四个主题:“带着先入之见参加会议”,显示了一些举报人对社会保障服务的负面先入之见如何在跨部门协作会议中得到解决,并在某些情况下得到解决。“Get to know each other”,强调会议为参与者提供了增加他们对相关参与者的了解的机会。“获取详细的健康信息?”指出,虽然保健提供者对是否应与社会保障监督员共享敏感健康信息表示关切,但监督员认为这一问题不那么令人担忧。最后,“谁有最终决定权?”,这表明会议期间决策过程的不明确造成了参与者之间的分歧。结论:举报人认为,患者、社会保障监督者和医疗保健提供者之间的跨部门协作会议虽然具有挑战性,但在管理慢性疼痛患者的需求方面可以发挥重要作用。这项研究强调需要澄清各行动者的作用,并为会议制定共同商定的议程,以确保有效的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信