Julio A Zimbron, Stephen J Del Grosso, Jorge A Delgado
{"title":"Measurement of nitrous oxide soil fluxes using sorbent-stabilized sampling of flux chambers.","authors":"Julio A Zimbron, Stephen J Del Grosso, Jorge A Delgado","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A new chamber-based method to measure nitrous oxide soil gas fluxes using an N<sub>2</sub>O sorbent is presented. The Greenhouse Gas Reduction through Agricultural Carbon Enhancement network (GRACEnet) protocols require grab samples (typically 25 mL ea.) obtained at multiple intervals throughout chamber deployment (i.e., 0, 15, and 30 min) and linear and nonlinear options to process the raw concentrations, based on goodness-of-fit tests. The new method uses a single, sorbent-stabilized large volume (400 mL) gas sample collected at the end of each chamber deployment (30 min) and assumes a linear concentration increase. Both methods estimate the initial (time 0) gas flux using chamber concentration changes and deployment time. This report presents a side-by-side field test in experimental plots. Samples were independently analyzed by gas chromatography and thermal desorption/gas chromatography for the standard and new method, respectively. Gas concentrations measured by both methods at the end of the chamber deployment and calculated soil gas fluxes were in close agreement (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.92 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91, respectively). Additionally, four 100 mL samples taken from multiple chambers at the end of the deployment were pooled into a single cartridge to explore the sorbent's potential to further reduce the number of samples. Pooled sample results from four locations correlated well with average chamber deployments (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.92 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95 for concentrations and soil gas fluxes, respectively). These results suggest sorbent-based sampling can yield soil gas flux data of similar magnitude to interval grab sampling methods. Further testing is required to study the advantages and limitations of the new method.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A new chamber-based method to measure nitrous oxide soil gas fluxes using an N2O sorbent is presented. The Greenhouse Gas Reduction through Agricultural Carbon Enhancement network (GRACEnet) protocols require grab samples (typically 25 mL ea.) obtained at multiple intervals throughout chamber deployment (i.e., 0, 15, and 30 min) and linear and nonlinear options to process the raw concentrations, based on goodness-of-fit tests. The new method uses a single, sorbent-stabilized large volume (400 mL) gas sample collected at the end of each chamber deployment (30 min) and assumes a linear concentration increase. Both methods estimate the initial (time 0) gas flux using chamber concentration changes and deployment time. This report presents a side-by-side field test in experimental plots. Samples were independently analyzed by gas chromatography and thermal desorption/gas chromatography for the standard and new method, respectively. Gas concentrations measured by both methods at the end of the chamber deployment and calculated soil gas fluxes were in close agreement (R2 = 0.92 and R2 = 0.91, respectively). Additionally, four 100 mL samples taken from multiple chambers at the end of the deployment were pooled into a single cartridge to explore the sorbent's potential to further reduce the number of samples. Pooled sample results from four locations correlated well with average chamber deployments (R2 = 0.92 and R2 = 0.95 for concentrations and soil gas fluxes, respectively). These results suggest sorbent-based sampling can yield soil gas flux data of similar magnitude to interval grab sampling methods. Further testing is required to study the advantages and limitations of the new method.
期刊介绍:
Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring.
Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.