Xinyin Chen, Mengting Liu, Dan Li, Junsheng Liu, Guomin Jin
{"title":"Sociometric likeability and perceived likeability: Relations with academic performance and psychological problems in Chinese children and adolescents.","authors":"Xinyin Chen, Mengting Liu, Dan Li, Junsheng Liu, Guomin Jin","doi":"10.1037/dev0001981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers have been interested in the role of social reputation in shaping individual behaviors and adjustment. Whereas the significance of academic reputation has been demonstrated for students' performance, the role of reputation remains unclear in the socioemotional domain. This 2-year longitudinal study focused on perceived likeability to capture the reputational aspect of peer likeability and examined its relations with school performance and psychological problems in comparison with those for sociometric likeability. Participants included students (<i>N</i> = 4,850; 2,395 boys), initially in fourth and seventh grades (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 10 and 13 years), in China. Data were obtained from multiple sources including peer assessments, teacher ratings, self-reports, and school records. Among the results, perceived likeability predicted later academic performance more robustly than sociometric likeability. Whereas sociometric likeability negatively predicted later psychological problems in elementary school students, perceived likeability negatively predicted later psychological problems in middle school students. The results indicate distinct patterns of contributions of sociometric likeability and perceived likeability to adjustment and the role of social reputation in strengthening the function of peer likeability, particularly in middle school students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Researchers have been interested in the role of social reputation in shaping individual behaviors and adjustment. Whereas the significance of academic reputation has been demonstrated for students' performance, the role of reputation remains unclear in the socioemotional domain. This 2-year longitudinal study focused on perceived likeability to capture the reputational aspect of peer likeability and examined its relations with school performance and psychological problems in comparison with those for sociometric likeability. Participants included students (N = 4,850; 2,395 boys), initially in fourth and seventh grades (Mage = 10 and 13 years), in China. Data were obtained from multiple sources including peer assessments, teacher ratings, self-reports, and school records. Among the results, perceived likeability predicted later academic performance more robustly than sociometric likeability. Whereas sociometric likeability negatively predicted later psychological problems in elementary school students, perceived likeability negatively predicted later psychological problems in middle school students. The results indicate distinct patterns of contributions of sociometric likeability and perceived likeability to adjustment and the role of social reputation in strengthening the function of peer likeability, particularly in middle school students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.