A comparative analysis of logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting antimicrobial resistance in surgical ICU patients: Insights from real-world evidence in India.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prity Rani Deshwal, Pramil Tiwari
{"title":"A comparative analysis of logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting antimicrobial resistance in surgical ICU patients: Insights from real-world evidence in India.","authors":"Prity Rani Deshwal, Pramil Tiwari","doi":"10.1177/09246479251337933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMachine learning approaches for the prediction of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are gaining attention but are yet to be commonly applied in practice.ObjectiveThis study aims to predict the AMR in surgical intensive care unit patients using logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) model.MethodsSurgical ICU patients with resistant infections, regardless of the microorganism, were considered cases. Those with susceptible or no infections were considered controls. A total of 104 variables for patient characteristics, disease-related and clinical parameters, and surgical, culture, and prescription details were tested for the prediction of AMR using two methods: LR and ANN. The dataset was divided into a training (<i>n</i> = 3179) and a test (<i>n</i> = 1363) set. The outcome was considered a binary outcome: resistant infection and sensitive infection. Model evaluation metrics were an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Predictive analysis was performed by using R software.ResultsOut of 8010 ICU patients, 4542 patients underwent surgery. Out of these surgical ICU patients, 36.90% were cases and 63.09% were controls. Both models performed similarly concerning sensitivity (ANN 86.6%; LR 86%), while improvement was found with respect to accuracy (ANN 88.2%; LR 86%), specificity (ANN 91.2%; LR 86%), AUROC (ANN 94%; LR 93%), and NPV (ANN 82.8%; LR 91%).ConclusionsThe ANN model has more predicting performance than the LR model to predict AMR in surgical ICU patients. These prediction algorithms may assist clinical decisions to aid the prevention of AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"9246479251337933"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251337933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMachine learning approaches for the prediction of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are gaining attention but are yet to be commonly applied in practice.ObjectiveThis study aims to predict the AMR in surgical intensive care unit patients using logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) model.MethodsSurgical ICU patients with resistant infections, regardless of the microorganism, were considered cases. Those with susceptible or no infections were considered controls. A total of 104 variables for patient characteristics, disease-related and clinical parameters, and surgical, culture, and prescription details were tested for the prediction of AMR using two methods: LR and ANN. The dataset was divided into a training (n = 3179) and a test (n = 1363) set. The outcome was considered a binary outcome: resistant infection and sensitive infection. Model evaluation metrics were an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Predictive analysis was performed by using R software.ResultsOut of 8010 ICU patients, 4542 patients underwent surgery. Out of these surgical ICU patients, 36.90% were cases and 63.09% were controls. Both models performed similarly concerning sensitivity (ANN 86.6%; LR 86%), while improvement was found with respect to accuracy (ANN 88.2%; LR 86%), specificity (ANN 91.2%; LR 86%), AUROC (ANN 94%; LR 93%), and NPV (ANN 82.8%; LR 91%).ConclusionsThe ANN model has more predicting performance than the LR model to predict AMR in surgical ICU patients. These prediction algorithms may assist clinical decisions to aid the prevention of AMR.

预测外科ICU患者抗菌素耐药性的逻辑回归(LR)和人工神经网络(ANN)模型的比较分析:来自印度现实世界证据的见解。
预测抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的机器学习方法正在引起人们的关注,但尚未在实践中得到普遍应用。目的应用logistic回归(LR)和人工神经网络(ANN)模型对外科重症监护病房患者AMR进行预测。方法将外科ICU患者的耐药感染,不论微生物,均视为病例。易感或没有感染的人被认为是对照组。采用LR和ANN两种方法,对患者特征、疾病相关和临床参数、手术、培养和处方细节等共104个变量进行测试,以预测AMR。数据集分为训练集(n = 3179)和测试集(n = 1363)。结果被认为是一个二元结果:耐药感染和敏感感染。模型评价指标为受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。采用R软件进行预测分析。结果8010例ICU患者中,4542例接受手术治疗。其中,病例占36.90%,对照组占63.09%。两种模型在敏感性方面表现相似(ANN 86.6%;LR 86%),而准确率有所提高(ANN 88.2%;LR 86%),特异性(ANN 91.2%;Lr 86%), auroc (ann 94%;LR 93%), NPV (ANN 82.8%;LR 91%)。结论人工神经网络模型对外科ICU患者AMR的预测效果优于LR模型。这些预测算法可能有助于临床决策,以帮助预防抗菌素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine is concerned with rendering the practice of medicine as safe as it can be; that involves promoting the highest possible quality of care, but also examining how those risks which are inevitable can be contained and managed. This is not exclusively a drugs journal. Recently it was decided to include in the subtitle of the journal three items to better indicate the scope of the journal, i.e. patient safety, pharmacovigilance and liability and the Editorial Board was adjusted accordingly. For each of these sections an Associate Editor was invited. We especially want to emphasize patient safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信