Professional Identity in Nursing: A Narrative Review of the ISPIN Definition and Domains Usage.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251335240
Sarah M Geoghan Marold, Susan M Strouse, Dan Butcher
{"title":"Professional Identity in Nursing: A Narrative Review of the ISPIN Definition and Domains Usage.","authors":"Sarah M Geoghan Marold, Susan M Strouse, Dan Butcher","doi":"10.1177/23779608251335240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Established in 2020, the International Society for Professional Identity in Nursing (ISPIN) developed a definition of professional identity in nursing (PIN). This definition encompasses four domains: values and ethics, knowledge, nurse as leader, and professional comportment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This narrative review aimed to summarize and synthesize identified published evidence, the extent of discussion of PIN domains, and literature gaps for the ISPIN definition of PIN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sources included peer-reviewed literature published between 2018 to 2025 from CINAHL and PubMed. Gray literature through Google Scholar and ISPIN archived publications were also searched. These were identified by two researchers and a PRISMA flow diagram was developed. No registered protocol was utilized. Search and MeSH terms included \"professional identity,\" \"nurs*,\" and \"ISPIN.\"</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Thirty-seven articles met inclusion criteria and were extracted from 16,295 initially identified articles, with the majority with authors from the United States. There were very few research papers and a noticeable dearth using quantitative methodologies. Twenty-eight of the retrieved articles were considered expert accounts, conceptual discussion or opinions, common for a relatively new concept.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nurse as leader was discussed in 34 of 37 articles. Professional comportment was discussed in 31 articles. Both knowledge and value and ethics were discussed in 28 articles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This narrative review highlights the nature and prevalence of the ISPIN definitions and its four domains in current literature and can be visualized through diagramming. Minimal quantitative studies and a higher volume of discussion articles present limitations to its strength and applicability. Results suggests the need for further research in all domains, particularly in <i>knowledge</i> and <i>values and ethics</i>, and its implications in strengthening nursing practice and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251335240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251335240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Established in 2020, the International Society for Professional Identity in Nursing (ISPIN) developed a definition of professional identity in nursing (PIN). This definition encompasses four domains: values and ethics, knowledge, nurse as leader, and professional comportment.

Objective: This narrative review aimed to summarize and synthesize identified published evidence, the extent of discussion of PIN domains, and literature gaps for the ISPIN definition of PIN.

Methods: Sources included peer-reviewed literature published between 2018 to 2025 from CINAHL and PubMed. Gray literature through Google Scholar and ISPIN archived publications were also searched. These were identified by two researchers and a PRISMA flow diagram was developed. No registered protocol was utilized. Search and MeSH terms included "professional identity," "nurs*," and "ISPIN."

Findings: Thirty-seven articles met inclusion criteria and were extracted from 16,295 initially identified articles, with the majority with authors from the United States. There were very few research papers and a noticeable dearth using quantitative methodologies. Twenty-eight of the retrieved articles were considered expert accounts, conceptual discussion or opinions, common for a relatively new concept.

Discussion: Nurse as leader was discussed in 34 of 37 articles. Professional comportment was discussed in 31 articles. Both knowledge and value and ethics were discussed in 28 articles.

Conclusion: This narrative review highlights the nature and prevalence of the ISPIN definitions and its four domains in current literature and can be visualized through diagramming. Minimal quantitative studies and a higher volume of discussion articles present limitations to its strength and applicability. Results suggests the need for further research in all domains, particularly in knowledge and values and ethics, and its implications in strengthening nursing practice and education.

护理中的职业认同:ISPIN定义和领域使用的叙述性回顾。
导言:国际护理专业认同协会(ISPIN)成立于2020年,制定了护理专业认同(PIN)的定义。这一定义包括四个领域:价值观和伦理、知识、护士领导和专业行为。目的:本综述旨在总结和综合已发表的证据、PIN域的讨论程度以及ISPIN对PIN定义的文献空白。方法:来源包括2018年至2025年在CINAHL和PubMed发表的同行评议文献。通过b谷歌Scholar和ISPIN存档出版物检索灰色文献。这是由两名研究人员确定的,并制定了PRISMA流程图。未使用已注册的协议。搜索和MeSH术语包括“职业身份”、“护士*”和“ISPIN”。结果:37篇文章符合纳入标准,从最初确定的16295篇文章中提取出来,其中大多数作者来自美国。使用定量方法的研究论文很少,而且明显缺乏。检索到的文章中有28篇被认为是专家报告、概念性讨论或观点,对于一个相对较新的概念来说很常见。讨论:37篇文章中有34篇讨论了护士的领导作用。31篇文章讨论了专业行为。28篇文章讨论了知识、价值和伦理。结论:这篇叙述性综述突出了ISPIN定义的性质和流行程度及其在当前文献中的四个领域,并可以通过图表进行可视化。少量的定量研究和大量的讨论文章限制了它的强度和适用性。结果表明需要在各个领域进行进一步的研究,特别是在知识、价值观和伦理方面,以及它对加强护理实践和教育的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信