Receipt of medications for opioid use disorders among veterans by race/ethnicity and legal involvement: an observational study of electronic health records.

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Andrea K Finlay, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Mengfei Yu, Christine Timko, Ingrid A Binswanger, David Smelson, Emmeline Taylor, Alex H S Harris
{"title":"Receipt of medications for opioid use disorders among veterans by race/ethnicity and legal involvement: an observational study of electronic health records.","authors":"Andrea K Finlay, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Mengfei Yu, Christine Timko, Ingrid A Binswanger, David Smelson, Emmeline Taylor, Alex H S Harris","doi":"10.1186/s40352-025-00336-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Veterans Health Administration has made strides to improve access to medications for opioid use disorder overall. However, quality improvement methods to assess treatment gaps may not sufficiently detect differences in medication access by intersecting patient factors, which may have multiplicative rather than additive effects. This study aimed to determine whether race/ethnicity and legal involvement interact in receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among Veterans Health Administration patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using national electronic health record data from Fiscal Years 2021-2022, we examined the receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among veterans diagnosed with opioid use disorder who received healthcare at Veterans Health Administration facilities (n = 65,883). We conducted a mixed effects multivariable logistic regression model to examine an interaction effect of race/ethnicity and legal involvement with receipt of any medications for opioid use disorder, both unadjusted and adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In an adjusted logistic regression model, the interaction effect indicated that non-Hispanic Black veterans with legal involvement had the lowest odds of medications for opioid use disorder receipt compared to non-Hispanic White veterans without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.59-0.77, p <.0001). Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native patients without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.99, p =.04) also had lower odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement. Non-Hispanic White veterans with legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.14, p =.03) had higher odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Veterans Health Administration quality improvement efforts should monitor interacting racial and legal status factors and understand and address patient, clinical, and regulatory barriers to medications for opioid use disorder among Black veterans with legal involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00336-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Veterans Health Administration has made strides to improve access to medications for opioid use disorder overall. However, quality improvement methods to assess treatment gaps may not sufficiently detect differences in medication access by intersecting patient factors, which may have multiplicative rather than additive effects. This study aimed to determine whether race/ethnicity and legal involvement interact in receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among Veterans Health Administration patients.

Methods: Using national electronic health record data from Fiscal Years 2021-2022, we examined the receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among veterans diagnosed with opioid use disorder who received healthcare at Veterans Health Administration facilities (n = 65,883). We conducted a mixed effects multivariable logistic regression model to examine an interaction effect of race/ethnicity and legal involvement with receipt of any medications for opioid use disorder, both unadjusted and adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.

Results: In an adjusted logistic regression model, the interaction effect indicated that non-Hispanic Black veterans with legal involvement had the lowest odds of medications for opioid use disorder receipt compared to non-Hispanic White veterans without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.59-0.77, p <.0001). Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native patients without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.99, p =.04) also had lower odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement. Non-Hispanic White veterans with legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.14, p =.03) had higher odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement.

Conclusions: Veterans Health Administration quality improvement efforts should monitor interacting racial and legal status factors and understand and address patient, clinical, and regulatory barriers to medications for opioid use disorder among Black veterans with legal involvement.

按种族/族裔和法律参与分列的退伍军人阿片类药物使用障碍的药物接收情况:电子健康记录的观察性研究
背景:退伍军人健康管理局在改善阿片类药物使用障碍的总体可及性方面取得了长足的进步。然而,评估治疗差距的质量改进方法可能无法通过交叉患者因素充分检测药物获取的差异,这些因素可能具有乘法效应而不是加法效应。本研究旨在确定种族/民族和法律参与是否在退伍军人健康管理局患者接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物方面相互作用。方法:使用2021-2022财政年度的国家电子健康记录数据,我们检查了在退伍军人健康管理机构接受医疗保健的诊断为阿片类药物使用障碍的退伍军人的药物收据(n = 65,883)。我们进行了一个混合效应多变量逻辑回归模型,以检验种族/民族和法律参与与接受任何阿片类药物使用障碍的相互作用,包括未调整和调整的患者和设施特征。结果:在调整后的logistic回归模型中,相互作用效应显示,有法律纠纷的非西班牙裔黑人退伍军人比没有法律纠纷的非西班牙裔白人退伍军人获得阿片类药物使用障碍药物的几率最低(调整优势比= 0.67,95%可信区间= 0.59-0.77,p)。退伍军人健康管理局的质量改进工作应监测相互作用的种族和法律地位因素,并了解和解决黑人退伍军人在阿片类药物使用障碍方面的患者、临床和监管障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信