Receipt of medications for opioid use disorders among veterans by race/ethnicity and legal involvement: an observational study of electronic health records.
Andrea K Finlay, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Mengfei Yu, Christine Timko, Ingrid A Binswanger, David Smelson, Emmeline Taylor, Alex H S Harris
{"title":"Receipt of medications for opioid use disorders among veterans by race/ethnicity and legal involvement: an observational study of electronic health records.","authors":"Andrea K Finlay, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Mengfei Yu, Christine Timko, Ingrid A Binswanger, David Smelson, Emmeline Taylor, Alex H S Harris","doi":"10.1186/s40352-025-00336-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Veterans Health Administration has made strides to improve access to medications for opioid use disorder overall. However, quality improvement methods to assess treatment gaps may not sufficiently detect differences in medication access by intersecting patient factors, which may have multiplicative rather than additive effects. This study aimed to determine whether race/ethnicity and legal involvement interact in receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among Veterans Health Administration patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using national electronic health record data from Fiscal Years 2021-2022, we examined the receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among veterans diagnosed with opioid use disorder who received healthcare at Veterans Health Administration facilities (n = 65,883). We conducted a mixed effects multivariable logistic regression model to examine an interaction effect of race/ethnicity and legal involvement with receipt of any medications for opioid use disorder, both unadjusted and adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In an adjusted logistic regression model, the interaction effect indicated that non-Hispanic Black veterans with legal involvement had the lowest odds of medications for opioid use disorder receipt compared to non-Hispanic White veterans without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.59-0.77, p <.0001). Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native patients without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.99, p =.04) also had lower odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement. Non-Hispanic White veterans with legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.14, p =.03) had higher odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Veterans Health Administration quality improvement efforts should monitor interacting racial and legal status factors and understand and address patient, clinical, and regulatory barriers to medications for opioid use disorder among Black veterans with legal involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00336-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Veterans Health Administration has made strides to improve access to medications for opioid use disorder overall. However, quality improvement methods to assess treatment gaps may not sufficiently detect differences in medication access by intersecting patient factors, which may have multiplicative rather than additive effects. This study aimed to determine whether race/ethnicity and legal involvement interact in receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among Veterans Health Administration patients.
Methods: Using national electronic health record data from Fiscal Years 2021-2022, we examined the receipt of medications for opioid use disorder among veterans diagnosed with opioid use disorder who received healthcare at Veterans Health Administration facilities (n = 65,883). We conducted a mixed effects multivariable logistic regression model to examine an interaction effect of race/ethnicity and legal involvement with receipt of any medications for opioid use disorder, both unadjusted and adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.
Results: In an adjusted logistic regression model, the interaction effect indicated that non-Hispanic Black veterans with legal involvement had the lowest odds of medications for opioid use disorder receipt compared to non-Hispanic White veterans without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.59-0.77, p <.0001). Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native patients without legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.99, p =.04) also had lower odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement. Non-Hispanic White veterans with legal involvement (adjusted odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.14, p =.03) had higher odds of receipt of medications for opioid use disorder compared to non-Hispanic White patients without legal involvement.
Conclusions: Veterans Health Administration quality improvement efforts should monitor interacting racial and legal status factors and understand and address patient, clinical, and regulatory barriers to medications for opioid use disorder among Black veterans with legal involvement.
期刊介绍:
Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.