Brain Functional Connectivity During First- and Third-Person Visual Imagery.

Q2 Medicine
Ekaterina Pechenkova, Mary Rachinskaya, Varvara Vasilenko, Olesya Blazhenkova, Elena Mershina
{"title":"Brain Functional Connectivity During First- and Third-Person Visual Imagery.","authors":"Ekaterina Pechenkova, Mary Rachinskaya, Varvara Vasilenko, Olesya Blazhenkova, Elena Mershina","doi":"10.3390/vision9020030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to adopt different perspectives, or vantage points, is fundamental to human cognition, affecting reasoning, memory, and imagery. While the first-person perspective allows individuals to experience a scene through their own eyes, the third-person perspective involves an external viewpoint, which is thought to demand greater cognitive effort and different neural processing. Despite the frequent use of perspective switching across various contexts, including modern media and in therapeutic settings, the neural mechanisms differentiating these two perspectives in visual imagery remain largely underexplored. In an exploratory fMRI study, we compared both activation and task-based functional connectivity underlying first-person and third-person perspective taking in the same 26 participants performing two spatial egocentric imagery tasks, namely imaginary tennis and house navigation. No significant differences in activation emerged between the first-person and third-person conditions. The network-based statistics analysis revealed a small subnetwork of the early visual and posterior temporal areas that manifested stronger functional connectivity during the first-person perspective, suggesting a closer sensory recruitment loop, or, in different terms, a loop between long-term memory and the \"visual buffer\" circuits. The absence of a strong neural distinction between the first-person and third-person perspectives suggests that third-person imagery may not fully decenter individuals from the scene, as is often assumed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9020030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to adopt different perspectives, or vantage points, is fundamental to human cognition, affecting reasoning, memory, and imagery. While the first-person perspective allows individuals to experience a scene through their own eyes, the third-person perspective involves an external viewpoint, which is thought to demand greater cognitive effort and different neural processing. Despite the frequent use of perspective switching across various contexts, including modern media and in therapeutic settings, the neural mechanisms differentiating these two perspectives in visual imagery remain largely underexplored. In an exploratory fMRI study, we compared both activation and task-based functional connectivity underlying first-person and third-person perspective taking in the same 26 participants performing two spatial egocentric imagery tasks, namely imaginary tennis and house navigation. No significant differences in activation emerged between the first-person and third-person conditions. The network-based statistics analysis revealed a small subnetwork of the early visual and posterior temporal areas that manifested stronger functional connectivity during the first-person perspective, suggesting a closer sensory recruitment loop, or, in different terms, a loop between long-term memory and the "visual buffer" circuits. The absence of a strong neural distinction between the first-person and third-person perspectives suggests that third-person imagery may not fully decenter individuals from the scene, as is often assumed.

第一和第三人称视觉意象中的脑功能连通性。
采用不同观点或有利位置的能力是人类认知的基础,影响推理、记忆和意象。虽然第一人称视角允许个人通过自己的眼睛体验场景,但第三人称视角涉及外部视角,这被认为需要更大的认知努力和不同的神经处理。尽管在包括现代媒体和治疗环境在内的各种环境中经常使用视角转换,但在视觉图像中区分这两种视角的神经机制仍未得到充分探索。在一项探索性的功能磁共振成像研究中,我们比较了同样26名参与者在执行两个空间自我中心成像任务,即想象网球和房屋导航时,第一人称和第三人称视角下的激活和基于任务的功能连接。在第一人称和第三人称情况下,激活没有显著差异。基于网络的统计分析显示,在第一人称视角下,早期视觉区和后颞区有一个小的子网络,显示出更强的功能连通性,这表明有一个更紧密的感觉招募回路,或者换句话说,在长期记忆和“视觉缓冲”回路之间有一个回路。第一人称和第三人称视角之间缺乏强烈的神经区分,这表明第三人称图像可能不会像人们通常认为的那样,使个体完全脱离场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信