Different attitudes towards estimating indirect costs of disease: The example of cancer.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036251326636
Katarzyna Miszczyńska, Bartłomiej Krzeczewski, Joanna Stawska
{"title":"Different attitudes towards estimating indirect costs of disease: The example of cancer.","authors":"Katarzyna Miszczyńska, Bartłomiej Krzeczewski, Joanna Stawska","doi":"10.1177/22799036251326636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Cost estimations in healthcare are crucial to make sound and adequate economic evaluations and assessments. The concept of indirect costs' estimation seems to be still not very well developed and systematized. This article is dedicated to the problem of indirect costs estimation of different types of cancer. The main aim of the article is to analyse the frequency of usage of different methods used for estimating indirect costs in economic analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There are discussed various methods used for indirect costs' estimations. Among them, in details, there are described: human capital approach (HCA), friction cost method (FCM) and health state valuation (HSV). There is included a systematic review of the articles dedicated to the problem of cancer costs'estimation.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Analysing the results of our analysis it turns out that the most frequently used method of estimating indirect costs is the human capital approach (HCA). It makes more than 53% of the analysed studies. The second most frequently used method is the health state valuation (HSV) which constitutes less than 17%.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Calculating indirect costs in the proper way is of a great importance to adequate overall costs' evaluation of disease. It is very important to be aware of different attitudes towards estimating indirect costs of diseases as it may allow for much more accurate assessments which will be beneficial for healthcare systems and proper allocation of limited resources. The deliberations presented in this paper might be very useful for the health technology assessment institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"22799036251326636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251326636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: Cost estimations in healthcare are crucial to make sound and adequate economic evaluations and assessments. The concept of indirect costs' estimation seems to be still not very well developed and systematized. This article is dedicated to the problem of indirect costs estimation of different types of cancer. The main aim of the article is to analyse the frequency of usage of different methods used for estimating indirect costs in economic analysis.

Methods: There are discussed various methods used for indirect costs' estimations. Among them, in details, there are described: human capital approach (HCA), friction cost method (FCM) and health state valuation (HSV). There is included a systematic review of the articles dedicated to the problem of cancer costs'estimation.

Principal findings: Analysing the results of our analysis it turns out that the most frequently used method of estimating indirect costs is the human capital approach (HCA). It makes more than 53% of the analysed studies. The second most frequently used method is the health state valuation (HSV) which constitutes less than 17%.

Practical applications: Calculating indirect costs in the proper way is of a great importance to adequate overall costs' evaluation of disease. It is very important to be aware of different attitudes towards estimating indirect costs of diseases as it may allow for much more accurate assessments which will be beneficial for healthcare systems and proper allocation of limited resources. The deliberations presented in this paper might be very useful for the health technology assessment institutions.

对估算疾病间接成本的不同态度:以癌症为例。
目标:医疗保健领域的成本估算对于进行合理和充分的经济评价和评估至关重要。间接成本估算的概念似乎还没有很好地发展和系统化。本文致力于研究不同类型癌症的间接成本估算问题。本文的主要目的是分析在经济分析中用于估算间接成本的不同方法的使用频率。方法:讨论了间接成本估算的各种方法。其中,详细描述有:人力资本法(HCA)、摩擦成本法(FCM)和健康状态评估法(HSV)。其中包括对致力于癌症成本估算问题的文章的系统回顾。主要发现:分析我们的分析结果表明,最常用的估算间接成本的方法是人力资本法(HCA)。它占分析研究的53%以上。第二常用的方法是健康状态评估(HSV),占比不到17%。实际应用:正确计算间接成本对于充分评估疾病总体成本具有重要意义。了解对估算疾病间接成本的不同态度是非常重要的,因为它可能允许更准确的评估,这将有利于卫生保健系统和适当分配有限的资源。本文提出的讨论可能对卫生技术评估机构非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信