Number of Intravenous Insertions Per Week Does Not Influence Infusion Nurses' Ratings of Risk Factors for Difficult Intravenous Access (DIVA).

IF 2.9 Q1 NURSING
Journal of Infusion Nursing Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000590
Emely Alfaro, Ruby Ejercito, Marissa Canote, Teresa Cosgrove, Jung-Ja Hawker, Marisa Quinn, Christine Miaskowski
{"title":"Number of Intravenous Insertions Per Week Does Not Influence Infusion Nurses' Ratings of Risk Factors for Difficult Intravenous Access (DIVA).","authors":"Emely Alfaro, Ruby Ejercito, Marissa Canote, Teresa Cosgrove, Jung-Ja Hawker, Marisa Quinn, Christine Miaskowski","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in nurses' ratings of risk factors for difficult intravenous access (DIVA) between oncology infusion unit nurses who perform ≤ 10 insertions compared to > 10 insertions per week.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An email requesting that recipients complete a revised version of the \"Survey on Nurses\" perceived DIVA factors that contained a list of 53 risk factors was sent to 152 nurses, of whom 81 responded. Nurses rated each DIVA risk factor, using a 0 (not at all predictive) to 10 (extremely predictive) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 nurses who completed the survey, 55.5% and 44.5% performed ≤ 10 insertions versus > 10 insertions per week, respectively. No differences were found between the groups on age, sex, education, or years of experience in nursing or in infusion nursing. Compared to nurses who performed ≤ 10 insertions per week, those who performed > 10 rated only 1 risk factor as more predictive of DIVA (ie, the patient has a history of cirrhosis). Risk factors with the highest DIVA prediction scores were multiple intravenous attempts on the day of treatment, history of multiple venipunctures during previous visits, current or past history of intravenous drug use, and occurrence of dehydration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings can be used to identify high-risk patients and educate oncology nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":"48 3","pages":"206-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in nurses' ratings of risk factors for difficult intravenous access (DIVA) between oncology infusion unit nurses who perform ≤ 10 insertions compared to > 10 insertions per week.

Methods: An email requesting that recipients complete a revised version of the "Survey on Nurses" perceived DIVA factors that contained a list of 53 risk factors was sent to 152 nurses, of whom 81 responded. Nurses rated each DIVA risk factor, using a 0 (not at all predictive) to 10 (extremely predictive) scale.

Results: Of the 81 nurses who completed the survey, 55.5% and 44.5% performed ≤ 10 insertions versus > 10 insertions per week, respectively. No differences were found between the groups on age, sex, education, or years of experience in nursing or in infusion nursing. Compared to nurses who performed ≤ 10 insertions per week, those who performed > 10 rated only 1 risk factor as more predictive of DIVA (ie, the patient has a history of cirrhosis). Risk factors with the highest DIVA prediction scores were multiple intravenous attempts on the day of treatment, history of multiple venipunctures during previous visits, current or past history of intravenous drug use, and occurrence of dehydration.

Conclusion: Findings can be used to identify high-risk patients and educate oncology nurses.

每周静脉注射次数不影响输液护士对静脉注射困难(DIVA)危险因素的评分。
目的:本研究的目的是评估每周输液≤10次与每周输液≤10次的肿瘤科输液单元护士对静脉注射困难(DIVA)危险因素评分的差异。方法:向152名护士发送电子邮件,要求收件人填写一份修订后的“护士感知DIVA因素调查”,其中包含53个风险因素,其中81个做出了回应。护士对每个DIVA风险因素进行评分,使用0(完全不可预测)到10(非常可预测)的等级。结果:完成调查的81名护士中,55.5%和44.5%的护士每周插入≤10次,而44.5%的护士每周插入10次。各组在年龄、性别、受教育程度、护理或输液护理经验等方面均无差异。与每周进行≤10次插入的护士相比,那些进行bbb10次插入的护士认为只有1个风险因素更能预测DIVA(即患者有肝硬化史)。DIVA预测评分最高的危险因素为治疗当日多次静脉尝试、就诊前多次静脉穿刺史、目前或既往静脉用药史、发生脱水。结论:研究结果可用于鉴别高危患者和对肿瘤护士进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信