Impact of Laboratory Analytical Indicators on Positive Blood Culture Detection Rates: A Single Center Study.

Di Wang, Ling Li Liu, Rui Rui Ma, Li Jun Du, Gui Xue Cheng, Ya Li Liu, Qiao Lian Yi, Ying Chun Xu
{"title":"Impact of Laboratory Analytical Indicators on Positive Blood Culture Detection Rates: A Single Center Study.","authors":"Di Wang, Ling Li Liu, Rui Rui Ma, Li Jun Du, Gui Xue Cheng, Ya Li Liu, Qiao Lian Yi, Ying Chun Xu","doi":"10.3967/bes2024.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections. Clinical laboratories must ensure the quality of blood culture processes from receipt to obtaining definitive results. We examined laboratory analytical indicators associated with positive blood culture results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood cultures collected from Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. The mode of transportation (piping logistics delivery <i>vs.</i> staff), source of blood cultures (outpatient/emergency department <i>vs.</i> inpatient department), rotation of personnel, and time of reception (8:00-19:59 <i>vs.</i> 20:00-07:59) were compared between blood culture-positive and -negative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2020 and 2022, the total positive rate of blood culture was 8.07%. The positive rate of blood cultures in the outpatient/emergency department was significantly higher than that in the inpatient department (12.46% <i>vs.</i> 5.83%; <i>P <</i> 0.0001). The time-to-detection of blood cultures was significantly affected by the delivery mode and personnel rotation. The blood culture positive rate of the total pre-analytical time within 1 h was significantly higher than that within 1-2 h or > 2 h ( <i>P</i> < 0.0170).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laboratory analytical indicators such as patient source, transportation mode, and personnel rotation significantly impacted the positive detection rate or time of blood culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":"38 3","pages":"303-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections. Clinical laboratories must ensure the quality of blood culture processes from receipt to obtaining definitive results. We examined laboratory analytical indicators associated with positive blood culture results.

Methods: Blood cultures collected from Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. The mode of transportation (piping logistics delivery vs. staff), source of blood cultures (outpatient/emergency department vs. inpatient department), rotation of personnel, and time of reception (8:00-19:59 vs. 20:00-07:59) were compared between blood culture-positive and -negative results.

Results: Between 2020 and 2022, the total positive rate of blood culture was 8.07%. The positive rate of blood cultures in the outpatient/emergency department was significantly higher than that in the inpatient department (12.46% vs. 5.83%; P < 0.0001). The time-to-detection of blood cultures was significantly affected by the delivery mode and personnel rotation. The blood culture positive rate of the total pre-analytical time within 1 h was significantly higher than that within 1-2 h or > 2 h ( P < 0.0170).

Conclusion: Laboratory analytical indicators such as patient source, transportation mode, and personnel rotation significantly impacted the positive detection rate or time of blood culture.

实验室分析指标对阳性血培养检出率的影响:单中心研究。
目的:血培养仍是诊断血流感染的金标准。临床实验室必须确保血液培养过程从接收到获得明确结果的质量。我们检查了与阳性血培养结果相关的实验室分析指标。方法:回顾性分析北京协和医院于2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日收集的血液培养标本。比较了血培养阳性和阴性结果的运输方式(管道物流配送vs人员)、血培养来源(门急诊vs住院部)、人员轮岗和接待时间(8:00-19:59 vs 20:00-07:59)。结果:2020 - 2022年,血培养总阳性率为8.07%。门急诊血培养阳性率明显高于住院部(12.46% vs. 5.83%;P 0.0001)。血液培养的检测时间受递送方式和人员轮换的显著影响。总分析前时间1 h内血培养阳性率显著高于1 ~ 2 h或1 ~ 2 h (P < 0.0170)。结论:患者来源、运输方式、人员轮换等实验室分析指标对血培养阳性检出率或时间有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信