A Retrospective Comparative Performance Analysis of Multifocal Eyecryl Actv IOL and the World's First Progressive Polyfocal Autofocus Pro IOL.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S521607
Arvind Kumar Morya, Prateek Nishant, Arshi Singh, Sony Sinha, Ramesh Chandra Shah
{"title":"A Retrospective Comparative Performance Analysis of Multifocal Eyecryl Actv IOL and the World's First Progressive Polyfocal Autofocus Pro IOL.","authors":"Arvind Kumar Morya, Prateek Nishant, Arshi Singh, Sony Sinha, Ramesh Chandra Shah","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S521607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This is the first study evaluating the visual outcomes of the novel Progressive Polyfocal Autofocus Pro intraocular lens (IOL) (Lifeline Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad, India) and comparing them with Eyecryl Actv multifocal IOL (model DIYHS600ROH, Biotech Vision Care Pvt. Ltd. Ahmedabad, India) at the first and sixth weeks after implantation in Indian eyes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective nonrandomized, comparative study was conducted based on hospital records of patients operated for cataract between January 2019 and January 2021 with bilateral implantation of one of the two presbyopia-correcting IOLs. Patients aged between 11 and 78 years, with preoperative astigmatism of 1 diopter or less and no other ocular disorders, were included. Visual acuity for distance, intermediate and near, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, depth of focus, patient satisfaction, and presence of optical phenomenon classically faced with conventional presbyopia-correcting IOLs were evaluated at 6 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 104 eligible patients, intermediate visual acuity scores, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, depth of focus, and patient satisfaction were better with the Autofocus Pro IOL (all P<0.001). Negative dysphotopsias were absent in the Autofocus Pro group, whereas they were seen in about one-third of patients in the Multifocal group (P<0.001). Halos and glare were also significantly lower in the Autofocus Pro group. There was no difference in the distance and near visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights superior clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction associated with Autofocus Pro IOLs compared to Multifocal IOLs, indicating their potential as a preferred choice for cataract surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1387-1399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S521607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This is the first study evaluating the visual outcomes of the novel Progressive Polyfocal Autofocus Pro intraocular lens (IOL) (Lifeline Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad, India) and comparing them with Eyecryl Actv multifocal IOL (model DIYHS600ROH, Biotech Vision Care Pvt. Ltd. Ahmedabad, India) at the first and sixth weeks after implantation in Indian eyes.

Patients and methods: A retrospective nonrandomized, comparative study was conducted based on hospital records of patients operated for cataract between January 2019 and January 2021 with bilateral implantation of one of the two presbyopia-correcting IOLs. Patients aged between 11 and 78 years, with preoperative astigmatism of 1 diopter or less and no other ocular disorders, were included. Visual acuity for distance, intermediate and near, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, depth of focus, patient satisfaction, and presence of optical phenomenon classically faced with conventional presbyopia-correcting IOLs were evaluated at 6 weeks postoperatively.

Results: Of 104 eligible patients, intermediate visual acuity scores, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, depth of focus, and patient satisfaction were better with the Autofocus Pro IOL (all P<0.001). Negative dysphotopsias were absent in the Autofocus Pro group, whereas they were seen in about one-third of patients in the Multifocal group (P<0.001). Halos and glare were also significantly lower in the Autofocus Pro group. There was no difference in the distance and near visual acuity.

Conclusion: This study highlights superior clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction associated with Autofocus Pro IOLs compared to Multifocal IOLs, indicating their potential as a preferred choice for cataract surgery.

多焦点人工晶状体和世界上第一个渐进多焦点自动聚焦人工晶状体的回顾性比较分析。
目的:本研究首次评估新型渐进式多焦自动聚焦人工晶状体(IOL) (Lifeline Medical Devices ppt . Ltd.)的视力效果。并与Eyecryl Actv多焦点人工晶体(型号DIYHS600ROH, Biotech Vision Care Pvt. Ltd.)进行比较。艾哈迈达巴德,印度)在印度眼睛植入后的第一和第六周。患者和方法:基于2019年1月至2021年1月期间双侧植入两种老花眼矫正iol之一的白内障患者的住院记录,进行回顾性、非随机、比较研究。患者年龄在11 ~ 78岁之间,术前散光≤1屈光度,无其他眼部疾病。术后6周评估远、中、近距离视力、屈光结果、对比敏感度、阅读速度、聚焦深度、患者满意度以及传统老花眼矫正人工晶状体常见的光学现象。结果:在104例符合条件的患者中,Autofocus Pro IOL的中等视力评分、阅读速度、对比敏感度、聚焦深度和患者满意度均优于Autofocus Pro IOL(均为p)。结论:本研究强调了与多焦点IOL相比,Autofocus Pro IOL具有更好的临床结果和患者满意度,表明其有潜力成为白内障手术的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信