{"title":"Relationships between occupation, attitudes towards mental health problems in the workplace and mental health stigma.","authors":"Gloria Cheung, Amy Ronaldson, Claire Henderson","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02927-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Discrimination against people with mental health problems in the workplace is still prominent. Characteristics of occupations can influence aspects of stigma and attitudes to mental health problems in the workplace context. We investigated occupational differences in mental health stigma, and attitudes to mental health in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the British Social Attitudes 2015 survey were used. Logistic and linear regression models were conducted to investigate associations between occupational categories, stigma as measured by desire for social distance, and attitudes towards mental health in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found occupational differences in attitudes towards mental health in the workplace, but not in levels of stigma. Compared to managerial and professional workers, lower supervisory and technical workers (group 4), semi-routine and routine workers (group 5) were less likely to believe that paid work is good for mental health (group 4: odds ratio (OR) = 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.61; group 5: OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.24-0.49) and people with depression should return to work when they can do some or most of the job (group 4: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48-0.94; group 5: OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.41-0.66). People in semi-routine and routine occupations were less likely to believe that having schizophrenia should not affect promotion at work (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62-0.97) than managerial and professional workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reinforce the importance of job characteristics on attitudes to mental health in the workplace. More support is needed for small companies to help them develop mental health policies. Modifications are needed to improve job control and ensure adjustments can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02927-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Discrimination against people with mental health problems in the workplace is still prominent. Characteristics of occupations can influence aspects of stigma and attitudes to mental health problems in the workplace context. We investigated occupational differences in mental health stigma, and attitudes to mental health in the workplace.
Methods: Data from the British Social Attitudes 2015 survey were used. Logistic and linear regression models were conducted to investigate associations between occupational categories, stigma as measured by desire for social distance, and attitudes towards mental health in the workplace.
Results: We found occupational differences in attitudes towards mental health in the workplace, but not in levels of stigma. Compared to managerial and professional workers, lower supervisory and technical workers (group 4), semi-routine and routine workers (group 5) were less likely to believe that paid work is good for mental health (group 4: odds ratio (OR) = 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.61; group 5: OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.24-0.49) and people with depression should return to work when they can do some or most of the job (group 4: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48-0.94; group 5: OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.41-0.66). People in semi-routine and routine occupations were less likely to believe that having schizophrenia should not affect promotion at work (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62-0.97) than managerial and professional workers.
Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the importance of job characteristics on attitudes to mental health in the workplace. More support is needed for small companies to help them develop mental health policies. Modifications are needed to improve job control and ensure adjustments can be made.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.