Relationships between occupation, attitudes towards mental health problems in the workplace and mental health stigma.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Gloria Cheung, Amy Ronaldson, Claire Henderson
{"title":"Relationships between occupation, attitudes towards mental health problems in the workplace and mental health stigma.","authors":"Gloria Cheung, Amy Ronaldson, Claire Henderson","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02927-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Discrimination against people with mental health problems in the workplace is still prominent. Characteristics of occupations can influence aspects of stigma and attitudes to mental health problems in the workplace context. We investigated occupational differences in mental health stigma, and attitudes to mental health in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the British Social Attitudes 2015 survey were used. Logistic and linear regression models were conducted to investigate associations between occupational categories, stigma as measured by desire for social distance, and attitudes towards mental health in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found occupational differences in attitudes towards mental health in the workplace, but not in levels of stigma. Compared to managerial and professional workers, lower supervisory and technical workers (group 4), semi-routine and routine workers (group 5) were less likely to believe that paid work is good for mental health (group 4: odds ratio (OR) = 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.61; group 5: OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.24-0.49) and people with depression should return to work when they can do some or most of the job (group 4: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48-0.94; group 5: OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.41-0.66). People in semi-routine and routine occupations were less likely to believe that having schizophrenia should not affect promotion at work (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62-0.97) than managerial and professional workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reinforce the importance of job characteristics on attitudes to mental health in the workplace. More support is needed for small companies to help them develop mental health policies. Modifications are needed to improve job control and ensure adjustments can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02927-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Discrimination against people with mental health problems in the workplace is still prominent. Characteristics of occupations can influence aspects of stigma and attitudes to mental health problems in the workplace context. We investigated occupational differences in mental health stigma, and attitudes to mental health in the workplace.

Methods: Data from the British Social Attitudes 2015 survey were used. Logistic and linear regression models were conducted to investigate associations between occupational categories, stigma as measured by desire for social distance, and attitudes towards mental health in the workplace.

Results: We found occupational differences in attitudes towards mental health in the workplace, but not in levels of stigma. Compared to managerial and professional workers, lower supervisory and technical workers (group 4), semi-routine and routine workers (group 5) were less likely to believe that paid work is good for mental health (group 4: odds ratio (OR) = 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.61; group 5: OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.24-0.49) and people with depression should return to work when they can do some or most of the job (group 4: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48-0.94; group 5: OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.41-0.66). People in semi-routine and routine occupations were less likely to believe that having schizophrenia should not affect promotion at work (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62-0.97) than managerial and professional workers.

Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the importance of job characteristics on attitudes to mental health in the workplace. More support is needed for small companies to help them develop mental health policies. Modifications are needed to improve job control and ensure adjustments can be made.

职业、对工作场所心理健康问题的态度与心理健康污名之间的关系。
目的:工作场所对有精神健康问题的人的歧视仍然很突出。职业特点可以影响工作场所对心理健康问题的污名化和态度。我们调查了工作场所心理健康污名和心理健康态度的职业差异。方法:使用2015年英国社会态度调查数据。运用逻辑回归和线性回归模型来调查职业类别、对社会距离的渴望所衡量的耻辱感和对工作场所心理健康的态度之间的关系。结果:我们发现工作场所对心理健康的态度存在职业差异,但在污名化程度上没有差异。与管理人员和专业人员相比,低级管理和技术工人(第4组)、半常规和常规工人(第5组)不太可能相信有偿工作对心理健康有益(第4组:优势比(OR) = 0.38, 95%可信区间(CI) = 0.24-0.61;第5组:OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.24-0.49),抑郁症患者应在能够完成部分或大部分工作时重返工作岗位(第4组:OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48-0.94;第5组:OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.41-0.66)。半常规和常规职业的人比管理和专业工作者更不可能相信精神分裂症不应该影响工作中的晋升(OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62-0.97)。结论:我们的研究结果强化了工作特征对工作场所心理健康态度的重要性。需要为小公司提供更多支持,帮助他们制定心理健康政策。需要修改以改进作业控制并确保可以进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信