Dysfunctional mismatch repair in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-04 DOI:10.1007/s12094-025-03933-x
María Muñiz-Castrillo, Noel Blaya Boluda, Esmeralda García-Torralba, Paula Jiménez-Fonseca, Carmen González Del Rey, Milagros Balbín, Ginés Luengo-Gil, Francisco Ayala de la Peña, Emilio Esteban González, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
{"title":"Dysfunctional mismatch repair in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer.","authors":"María Muñiz-Castrillo, Noel Blaya Boluda, Esmeralda García-Torralba, Paula Jiménez-Fonseca, Carmen González Del Rey, Milagros Balbín, Ginés Luengo-Gil, Francisco Ayala de la Peña, Emilio Esteban González, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-03933-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is well-characterized in several cancers, its role in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear. We comprehensively assessed MMR in early-stage TNBC, examining its prevalence, clinical correlations, prognostic value, relationship with microsatellite instability (MSI), and patterns of intratumoral heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two early-stage TNBC cohorts were investigated for germline mutations using next-generation sequencing, protein expression by immunohistochemistry, and MSI status through molecular detection. Associations with clinicopathological characteristics and survival were examined. Results were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 259 patients, MMR deficiency was observed in 8.2%, all showing PMS2 loss, while 2 germline PMS2 mutations (2.7%) were detected. At the somatic level, 35.8% showed heterogeneous MMR expression, more frequently in earlier stages (IA-IIA 41.4% vs. IIB-III 22.4%, p = 0.04) and smaller tumors (cT1-2 39.1% vs. cT3-4 18.5%, p = 0.01). MMR status showed no significant associations with other clinicopathological variables or survival. No MSI was detected in MMR-deficient cases. The 5-year recurrence rate was 16.0% (95% CI 10.0-24.0) for MMR-intact, 20.0% (95% CI 4.5-43.0) for MMR-deficient, and 17.9% (95% CI 9.8-28.1) for heterogeneous tumors (p = 0.75). Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was similar across MMR status groups. These findings were consistent with analyses using TCGA data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMR system shows a low rate of alterations in TNBC, with its deficiency being infrequent and not correlated with MSI. Although MMR system isolated evaluation may not be justified in early-stage TNBC due to its limited clinical impact, its inclusion in multigene panels should be further considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"3924-3937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-03933-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is well-characterized in several cancers, its role in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear. We comprehensively assessed MMR in early-stage TNBC, examining its prevalence, clinical correlations, prognostic value, relationship with microsatellite instability (MSI), and patterns of intratumoral heterogeneity.

Methods: Two early-stage TNBC cohorts were investigated for germline mutations using next-generation sequencing, protein expression by immunohistochemistry, and MSI status through molecular detection. Associations with clinicopathological characteristics and survival were examined. Results were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data.

Results: Among 259 patients, MMR deficiency was observed in 8.2%, all showing PMS2 loss, while 2 germline PMS2 mutations (2.7%) were detected. At the somatic level, 35.8% showed heterogeneous MMR expression, more frequently in earlier stages (IA-IIA 41.4% vs. IIB-III 22.4%, p = 0.04) and smaller tumors (cT1-2 39.1% vs. cT3-4 18.5%, p = 0.01). MMR status showed no significant associations with other clinicopathological variables or survival. No MSI was detected in MMR-deficient cases. The 5-year recurrence rate was 16.0% (95% CI 10.0-24.0) for MMR-intact, 20.0% (95% CI 4.5-43.0) for MMR-deficient, and 17.9% (95% CI 9.8-28.1) for heterogeneous tumors (p = 0.75). Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was similar across MMR status groups. These findings were consistent with analyses using TCGA data.

Conclusion: MMR system shows a low rate of alterations in TNBC, with its deficiency being infrequent and not correlated with MSI. Although MMR system isolated evaluation may not be justified in early-stage TNBC due to its limited clinical impact, its inclusion in multigene panels should be further considered.

早期三阴性乳腺癌患者的功能失调错配修复。
背景:虽然错配修复(MMR)缺陷在几种癌症中具有很好的特征,但其在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中的作用尚不清楚。我们全面评估了早期TNBC的MMR,检查其患病率、临床相关性、预后价值、与微卫星不稳定性(MSI)的关系以及肿瘤内异质性的模式。方法:采用新一代测序、免疫组化蛋白表达和分子检测MSI状态对两个早期TNBC队列进行种系突变研究。研究了与临床病理特征和生存率的关系。使用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据验证了结果。结果:259例患者中,8.2%的患者存在MMR缺陷,均表现为PMS2缺失,同时检测到2例生殖系PMS2突变(2.7%)。在体细胞水平,35.8%的患者表现出异质MMR表达,在早期(IA-IIA 41.4% vs. IIB-III 22.4%, p = 0.04)和较小的肿瘤(cT1-2 39.1% vs. cT3-4 18.5%, p = 0.01)中更为常见。MMR状态与其他临床病理变量或生存率无显著相关性。mmr缺陷病例未检出MSI。mmr完整的5年复发率为16.0% (95% CI 10.0-24.0), mmr缺失的5年复发率为20.0% (95% CI 4.5-43.0),异质性肿瘤的5年复发率为17.9% (95% CI 9.8-28.1) (p = 0.75)。在MMR状态组中,新辅助化疗的病理完全缓解相似。这些发现与使用TCGA数据的分析一致。结论:MMR系统在TNBC中的改变率较低,其缺陷并不常见,且与MSI无关。尽管由于临床影响有限,MMR系统分离评估在早期TNBC中可能不合理,但应进一步考虑将其纳入多基因小组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信