[MSB-07] Optimizing Postoperative Cardiac Tamponade Outcomes With Posterior Pericardial Window.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Mete Kubilay Kasap, Özgür Çoban, Nazenin Durak, Funda Tor Ocak
{"title":"[MSB-07] Optimizing Postoperative Cardiac Tamponade Outcomes With Posterior Pericardial Window.","authors":"Mete Kubilay Kasap, Özgür Çoban, Nazenin Durak, Funda Tor Ocak","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to assess the posterior pericardial windows technique in the management of pericardial effusion following cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study examined the data of 1,752 patients who underwent cardiac surgery from 2018 onwards, excluding those who had off-pump coronary artery bypass grafts or emergency surgeries for conditions such as type 1 aortic dissection or infective endocarditis. Of the included patients, a posterior pericardial window was created in 349. The posterior pericardial window was created using electrocautery before the implantation of prosthetic valves or distal anastomosis. No other procedural changes were made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative drainage rates were monitored. Drains were removed on the second day after surgery. Of the patients with a posterior pericardial window, eight (2.3%) required revision due to tamponade within the first two postoperative days, compared to 53 (3.7%) of the patients without a posterior pericardial window. Patients who required revision were discharged on average seven days later, while those who did not require revision were discharged after five days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The early detection and effective management of cardiac tamponade are crucial due to the potentially life-threatening outcomes. This study highlights the value of the posterior pericardial window technique in reducing complications associated with pericardial effusion following cardiac surgery. The findings support the need for further research to improve surgical approaches and enhance patient outcomes and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"32 4 Suppl 2","pages":"024-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to assess the posterior pericardial windows technique in the management of pericardial effusion following cardiac surgery.

Methods: This single-center study examined the data of 1,752 patients who underwent cardiac surgery from 2018 onwards, excluding those who had off-pump coronary artery bypass grafts or emergency surgeries for conditions such as type 1 aortic dissection or infective endocarditis. Of the included patients, a posterior pericardial window was created in 349. The posterior pericardial window was created using electrocautery before the implantation of prosthetic valves or distal anastomosis. No other procedural changes were made.

Results: Postoperative drainage rates were monitored. Drains were removed on the second day after surgery. Of the patients with a posterior pericardial window, eight (2.3%) required revision due to tamponade within the first two postoperative days, compared to 53 (3.7%) of the patients without a posterior pericardial window. Patients who required revision were discharged on average seven days later, while those who did not require revision were discharged after five days.

Conclusion: The early detection and effective management of cardiac tamponade are crucial due to the potentially life-threatening outcomes. This study highlights the value of the posterior pericardial window technique in reducing complications associated with pericardial effusion following cardiac surgery. The findings support the need for further research to improve surgical approaches and enhance patient outcomes and safety.

[MSB-07]心包后窗优化术后心包填塞效果。
目的:探讨心包后窗技术在心脏手术后心包积液治疗中的应用价值。方法:这项单中心研究调查了自2018年以来接受心脏手术的1752例患者的数据,不包括因1型主动脉夹层或感染性心内膜炎等情况进行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术或紧急手术的患者。在纳入的患者中,349例建立了后心包窗。在人工瓣膜植入或远端吻合前,采用电灼法制造心包后窗。没有作出其他程序上的改变。结果:监测术后引流率。术后第二天,引流管被移除。在有后心包窗的患者中,有8例(2.3%)在术后头两天内因填塞而需要翻修,而没有后心包窗的患者中有53例(3.7%)需要翻修。需要翻修的患者平均7天后出院,而不需要翻修的患者平均5天后出院。结论:心包填塞的早期发现和有效处理是至关重要的,因为它可能危及生命。本研究强调了心包后窗技术在减少心脏手术后心包积液并发症中的价值。研究结果支持需要进一步研究以改进手术方法,提高患者预后和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信