Preventing white spot lesions around orthodontic brackets: efficacy of pre-reacted glass-ionomer barrier coat versus silver diamine fluoride: an in vitro study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Enas A Elshenawy, Safa B Alawy, Wafaa Yahia Alghonemy, Ahmed Ibrahime El Dosoky
{"title":"Preventing white spot lesions around orthodontic brackets: efficacy of pre-reacted glass-ionomer barrier coat versus silver diamine fluoride: an in vitro study.","authors":"Enas A Elshenawy, Safa B Alawy, Wafaa Yahia Alghonemy, Ahmed Ibrahime El Dosoky","doi":"10.1038/s41405-025-00332-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to compare the effect of using a pre-reacted glass-ionomer (PRG) barrier coat versus silver diamine fluoride (SDF) varnish treatment before orthodontic bracket bonding to prevent white spot lesions (WSL). The effect of these materials on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets was evaluated through an in vitro study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred-five premolars were used; forty-two specimens were designated for comparing SDF versus PRG-barrier coat using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with elemental analysis and microhardness testing (n = 21/group). Tested materials were applied in a split-tooth design protocol (side A: control, side B: treated). Measurement was made at baseline and after bracket placement and exposure to the pH cycle. A polarized light microscope (PLM) was used for qualitative examination. Sixty-three specimens were intended for shear bond strength (SBS) testing after the pH cycle as follows: control group (no treatment), SDF group, and PRG-barrier coat group (n = 21/group). Statistical analysis was done using Paired T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SEM for specimens treated by SDF or PRG revealed enamel remineralization with calcium deposits and small porosities between the crystallites. All groups had a significant difference regarding the Ca/P ratio and microhardness. Baseline hardness for both groups was significantly higher than the treated sides, which was significantly higher than the non-treated sides (P = 0.000*) and (P = 0.000*) in accordance with the Paired T-test. In comparing SDF with PRG-coat groups, the T-test showed non-significant differences in mean differences between treated and baseline hardness values (T = 0.32, P = 0.74). PLM for treated specimens by SDF or PRG depicted an evident remineralized surface enamel layer. SBS values did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As confirmed by SEM and PLM, applying either SDF varnish or PRG-barrier coat before bonding orthodontic brackets could effectively prevent the development of WSL and achieve surface enamel protection. In addition, the two applied varnishes showed slightly higher shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets compared to the control group, with the SDF slightly higher than PRG. Also, clinical translation is needed in future research to evaluate the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00332-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: to compare the effect of using a pre-reacted glass-ionomer (PRG) barrier coat versus silver diamine fluoride (SDF) varnish treatment before orthodontic bracket bonding to prevent white spot lesions (WSL). The effect of these materials on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets was evaluated through an in vitro study.

Methods: One hundred-five premolars were used; forty-two specimens were designated for comparing SDF versus PRG-barrier coat using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with elemental analysis and microhardness testing (n = 21/group). Tested materials were applied in a split-tooth design protocol (side A: control, side B: treated). Measurement was made at baseline and after bracket placement and exposure to the pH cycle. A polarized light microscope (PLM) was used for qualitative examination. Sixty-three specimens were intended for shear bond strength (SBS) testing after the pH cycle as follows: control group (no treatment), SDF group, and PRG-barrier coat group (n = 21/group). Statistical analysis was done using Paired T-test.

Results: SEM for specimens treated by SDF or PRG revealed enamel remineralization with calcium deposits and small porosities between the crystallites. All groups had a significant difference regarding the Ca/P ratio and microhardness. Baseline hardness for both groups was significantly higher than the treated sides, which was significantly higher than the non-treated sides (P = 0.000*) and (P = 0.000*) in accordance with the Paired T-test. In comparing SDF with PRG-coat groups, the T-test showed non-significant differences in mean differences between treated and baseline hardness values (T = 0.32, P = 0.74). PLM for treated specimens by SDF or PRG depicted an evident remineralized surface enamel layer. SBS values did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: As confirmed by SEM and PLM, applying either SDF varnish or PRG-barrier coat before bonding orthodontic brackets could effectively prevent the development of WSL and achieve surface enamel protection. In addition, the two applied varnishes showed slightly higher shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets compared to the control group, with the SDF slightly higher than PRG. Also, clinical translation is needed in future research to evaluate the study.

预防正畸托架周围白斑病变:预反应玻璃离聚体屏障涂层与氟化银二胺的疗效:一项体外研究。
目的:比较正畸支架粘接前使用预反应玻璃离子聚体(PRG)屏障涂层与氟二胺银(SDF)清漆处理预防白斑病变(WSL)的效果。通过体外实验评估这些材料对正畸托槽剪切结合强度的影响。方法:使用前磨牙125颗;选取42个样品,采用扫描电镜(SEM)进行元素分析和显微硬度测试,比较SDF和prg屏障涂层(n = 21/组)。测试材料采用裂齿设计方案(a面:对照,B面:处理)。测量是在基线和支架放置和暴露于pH循环后进行的。采用偏光显微镜(PLM)进行定性检查。pH循环结束后,63个试件进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试,分别为对照组(未处理)、SDF组和prg -屏障涂层组(n = 21/组)。统计学分析采用配对t检验。结果:经SDF或PRG处理的牙釉质扫描电镜显示牙釉质再矿化,牙釉质间有钙沉积和小孔隙。各组Ca/P比值和显微硬度差异有统计学意义。根据配对t检验,两组的基线硬度均显著高于处理侧,且显著高于未处理侧(P = 0.000*)和(P = 0.000*)。在比较SDF组和PRG-coat组时,T检验显示处理后硬度值与基线硬度值之间的平均差异无显著差异(T = 0.32, P = 0.74)。经SDF或PRG处理的标本的PLM表现出明显的再矿化表面牙釉质层。两组间SBS值无显著差异。结论:SEM和PLM证实,正畸托槽粘接前涂SDF清漆或prg阻隔层均可有效防止WSL的发生,达到表面牙釉质保护的目的。此外,两种清漆的正畸托槽剪切结合强度略高于对照组,SDF略高于PRG。在未来的研究中,还需要临床翻译来评价该研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信