Health and care workers' perceptions of PPE and physical distancing for COVID-19: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i2.621
Dachi I Arikpo, Afiong O Oku, Okwu A Onyema, Edward O Odey, Hannah Hamilton-Hurwitz, João P Toledo, Kathleen Dunn, April Baller, Helen J Smith, Martin M Meremikwu
{"title":"Health and care workers' perceptions of PPE and physical distancing for COVID-19: A qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Dachi I Arikpo, Afiong O Oku, Okwu A Onyema, Edward O Odey, Hannah Hamilton-Hurwitz, João P Toledo, Kathleen Dunn, April Baller, Helen J Smith, Martin M Meremikwu","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i2.621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the effectiveness of personal protective equipment (PPE) and physical distancing interventions for COVID-19 infection prevention and control (IPC), low uptake among health and care workers persists.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesise evidence from primary qualitative research exploring the perceptions and experiences of health and care workers on the use of PPE and physical distancing in the context of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Healthcare settings including care homes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted using search terms based on the inclusion criteria, and the search strategy was peer-reviewed by a team of information scientists. Thirty qualitative studies were sampled after eligibility screening independently by two review authors. Synthesis was performed using the thematic synthesis approach. The confidence in each review finding was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations; Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen analytical themes were identified. Health and care workers valued the use of PPE in patient care. The sense of value was heightened by perceived susceptibility to infection with COVID-19, the need to deliver optimal patient care and the desire to protect family members. Service delivery, clinical workflows, the absence of visual cues for spatial separation and physical infrastructure hindered adherence to physical distancing guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The gap between IPC guidelines and their implementation is an important health system barrier to PPE use and physical distancing in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This review provides useful insights on key considerations for planning and implementing IPC in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 2","pages":"621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i2.621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the effectiveness of personal protective equipment (PPE) and physical distancing interventions for COVID-19 infection prevention and control (IPC), low uptake among health and care workers persists.

Aim: To synthesise evidence from primary qualitative research exploring the perceptions and experiences of health and care workers on the use of PPE and physical distancing in the context of COVID-19.

Setting: Healthcare settings including care homes.

Method: An electronic database search was conducted using search terms based on the inclusion criteria, and the search strategy was peer-reviewed by a team of information scientists. Thirty qualitative studies were sampled after eligibility screening independently by two review authors. Synthesis was performed using the thematic synthesis approach. The confidence in each review finding was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations; Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach.

Results: Fifteen analytical themes were identified. Health and care workers valued the use of PPE in patient care. The sense of value was heightened by perceived susceptibility to infection with COVID-19, the need to deliver optimal patient care and the desire to protect family members. Service delivery, clinical workflows, the absence of visual cues for spatial separation and physical infrastructure hindered adherence to physical distancing guidelines.

Conclusion: The gap between IPC guidelines and their implementation is an important health system barrier to PPE use and physical distancing in healthcare settings.

Contribution: This review provides useful insights on key considerations for planning and implementing IPC in healthcare settings.

卫生和保健工作者对个人防护装备和COVID-19保持身体距离的看法:定性证据综合
背景:尽管个人防护装备(PPE)和保持身体距离干预措施对COVID-19感染预防和控制(IPC)有效,但卫生和护理工作者的使用率仍然很低。目的:综合来自初步定性研究的证据,探讨在COVID-19背景下卫生和保健工作者对使用个人防护装备和保持身体距离的看法和经验。设置:医疗保健设置,包括护理院。方法:采用基于收录标准的检索词进行电子数据库检索,检索策略由信息科学家团队进行同行评议。30个定性研究在两位综述作者独立筛选合格性后被抽样。采用主题综合方法进行综合。使用推荐、评估、发展和评价的分级来评估每个综述发现的可信度;对定性研究综述证据的信心(GRADE-CERQual)方法。结果:确定了15个分析主题。卫生和护理工作者重视在病人护理中使用个人防护装备。人们对COVID-19感染的易感性、提供最佳患者护理的需要以及保护家庭成员的愿望,都增强了这种价值感。服务提供、临床工作流程、缺乏空间隔离的视觉提示和物理基础设施阻碍了对物理距离准则的遵守。结论:IPC指南及其实施之间的差距是卫生保健环境中个人防护装备使用和保持身体距离的重要卫生系统障碍。贡献:这篇综述提供了关于在医疗保健环境中规划和实施IPC的关键考虑因素的有用见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信