[Feasibility study on early orthodontic intervention in stage Ⅳ periodontitis].

Q4 Medicine
J Q Bao, L H Lei, Z X Wang, Y M Feng, W L Sun, L L Chen
{"title":"[Feasibility study on early orthodontic intervention in stage Ⅳ periodontitis].","authors":"J Q Bao, L H Lei, Z X Wang, Y M Feng, W L Sun, L L Chen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20241205-00458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the effects of early orthodontic intervention and conventional sequential periodontal-orthodontic treatment to periodontal health in patients with stage Ⅳ periodontitis. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 30 patients with stage Ⅳ periodontitis, who underwent combined periodontal and orthodontic therapies at the Department of Periodontology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from January 2018 to August 2024, were included. Patients who underwent early orthodontic intervention were initiated simultaneously or within one month after supragingival scaling and subgingival root planning (<i>n</i>=15). While patients in control group accomplished supragingival scaling, subgingival root planning, and corresponding periodontal surgeries to achieve inflammation control before starting orthodontic treatment (<i>n</i>=15). Periodontal parameters, including clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (+) % [BOP (+) %], were measured at baseline, one year after orthodontic treatment, and at the end of combined periodontal-orthodontic therapy respectively. Improvements in periodontal parameters and differences in tooth loss between the two groups were compared. <b>Results:</b> After receiving combined periodontal-orthodontic treatment, the CAL of the early orthodontic intervention group significantly decreased from (4.39±0.90) mm before treatment to (2.41±0.35) mm at the end of treatment (<i>t</i>=7.92, <i>P</i><0.001). Similarly, the PD significantly reduced from (4.20±1.04) mm before treatment to (2.20±0.38) mm at the end of treatment (<i>t</i>=7.01, <i>P</i><0.001). The BOP(+)% also showed a significant improvement, decreasing from 89.29% (68.00%, 100.00%) before treatment to 13.04% (7.14%, 17.86%) at the end of treatment (<i>Z</i>=-3.41, <i>P</i><0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the early orthodontic intervention group and control group in terms of baseline mean CAL, mean PD, and BOP(+)% (<i>t</i>=1.30, <i>P</i>=0.205; <i>t</i>=1.28, <i>P</i>=0.212; <i>Z</i>=0.58, <i>P</i>=0.559). Furthermore, the improvements in CAL and PD between the two groups were not significantly different compared to baseline (<i>Z</i>=-1.10, <i>P</i>=0.272; <i>Z</i>=-0.93, <i>P</i>=0.351). However, the number of missing teeth was significantly lower in the early orthodontic intervention group than in the control group (χ²=3.96, <i>P</i>=0.047). The duration of combined periodontal-orthodontic treatment in the early orthodontic intervention group was [33.13 (23.37, 36.20) months], which was significantly shorter than that in the control group [37.47 (32.33, 50.90) months] (<i>Z</i>=2.07, <i>P</i>=0.037). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both early orthodontic intervention and conventional periodontal-orthodontic treatment significantly improved CAL, PD, and BOP(+)% in stage Ⅳ periodontitis patients. Early orthodontic intervention contributed to the preservation of natural teeth and shortened the treatment duration of stage Ⅳ periodontitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23965,"journal":{"name":"中华口腔医学杂志","volume":"60 5","pages":"474-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20241205-00458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of early orthodontic intervention and conventional sequential periodontal-orthodontic treatment to periodontal health in patients with stage Ⅳ periodontitis. Methods: A total of 30 patients with stage Ⅳ periodontitis, who underwent combined periodontal and orthodontic therapies at the Department of Periodontology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from January 2018 to August 2024, were included. Patients who underwent early orthodontic intervention were initiated simultaneously or within one month after supragingival scaling and subgingival root planning (n=15). While patients in control group accomplished supragingival scaling, subgingival root planning, and corresponding periodontal surgeries to achieve inflammation control before starting orthodontic treatment (n=15). Periodontal parameters, including clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (+) % [BOP (+) %], were measured at baseline, one year after orthodontic treatment, and at the end of combined periodontal-orthodontic therapy respectively. Improvements in periodontal parameters and differences in tooth loss between the two groups were compared. Results: After receiving combined periodontal-orthodontic treatment, the CAL of the early orthodontic intervention group significantly decreased from (4.39±0.90) mm before treatment to (2.41±0.35) mm at the end of treatment (t=7.92, P<0.001). Similarly, the PD significantly reduced from (4.20±1.04) mm before treatment to (2.20±0.38) mm at the end of treatment (t=7.01, P<0.001). The BOP(+)% also showed a significant improvement, decreasing from 89.29% (68.00%, 100.00%) before treatment to 13.04% (7.14%, 17.86%) at the end of treatment (Z=-3.41, P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the early orthodontic intervention group and control group in terms of baseline mean CAL, mean PD, and BOP(+)% (t=1.30, P=0.205; t=1.28, P=0.212; Z=0.58, P=0.559). Furthermore, the improvements in CAL and PD between the two groups were not significantly different compared to baseline (Z=-1.10, P=0.272; Z=-0.93, P=0.351). However, the number of missing teeth was significantly lower in the early orthodontic intervention group than in the control group (χ²=3.96, P=0.047). The duration of combined periodontal-orthodontic treatment in the early orthodontic intervention group was [33.13 (23.37, 36.20) months], which was significantly shorter than that in the control group [37.47 (32.33, 50.90) months] (Z=2.07, P=0.037). Conclusions: Both early orthodontic intervention and conventional periodontal-orthodontic treatment significantly improved CAL, PD, and BOP(+)% in stage Ⅳ periodontitis patients. Early orthodontic intervention contributed to the preservation of natural teeth and shortened the treatment duration of stage Ⅳ periodontitis.

[Ⅳ牙周炎早期正畸干预的可行性研究]
目的:比较早期正畸干预与常规顺序牙周正畸治疗对Ⅳ期牙周炎患者牙周健康的影响。方法:选取2018年1月至2024年8月在浙江大学医学院第二附属医院牙周病科接受牙周与正畸联合治疗的Ⅳ期牙周炎患者30例。接受早期正畸干预的患者在龈上刮治和龈下牙根规划后同时或一个月内开始(n=15)。对照组患者在开始正畸治疗前完成龈上刮治、龈下根规划及相应的牙周手术以达到炎症控制(n=15)。牙周参数,包括临床附着水平(CAL)、探诊深度(PD)和探诊出血(+)% [BOP(+) %],分别在基线、正畸治疗后1年和牙周-正畸联合治疗结束时进行测量。比较两组患者牙周参数改善情况及牙齿脱落情况的差异。结果:早期正畸干预组在接受牙周-正畸联合治疗后,CAL由治疗前的(4.39±0.90)mm显著降低至治疗结束时的(2.41±0.35)mm (t=7.92, P0.001)。同样,PD从治疗前的(4.20±1.04)mm显著降低到治疗结束时的(2.20±0.38)mm (t=7.01, P0.001)。BOP(+)%由治疗前的89.29%(68.00%,100.00%)下降至治疗结束时的13.04%(7.14%,17.86%),差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.41, P0.001)。早期正畸干预组与对照组在基线平均CAL、平均PD、BOP(+)%方面差异无统计学意义(t=1.30, P=0.205;t = 1.28, P = 0.212;Z = 0.58, P = 0.559)。此外,与基线相比,两组之间CAL和PD的改善无显著差异(Z=-1.10, P=0.272;Z = -0.93, P = 0.351)。早期正畸干预组缺失牙数明显低于对照组(χ 2 =3.96, P=0.047)。早期正畸干预组牙周-正畸联合治疗时间为[33.13(23.37,36.20)个月],明显短于对照组[37.47(32.33,50.90)个月](Z=2.07, P=0.037)。结论:早期正畸干预和常规牙周正畸治疗均可显著改善Ⅳ期牙周炎患者的CAL、PD和BOP(+)%。早期正畸干预有助于保存自然牙,缩短Ⅳ期牙周炎的治疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华口腔医学杂志
中华口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9692
期刊介绍: Founded in August 1953, Chinese Journal of Stomatology is a monthly academic journal of stomatology published publicly at home and abroad, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and co-sponsored by the Chinese Stomatology Association. It mainly reports the leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of oral medicine, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in oral clinical practice and is closely combined with oral clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Over the years, Stomatology has been published in Medline, Scopus database, Toxicology Abstracts Database, Chemical Abstracts Database, American Cancer database, Russian Abstracts database, China Core Journal of Science and Technology, Peking University Core Journal, CSCD and other more than 20 important journals at home and abroad Physical medicine database and retrieval system included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信