Sedentary time in older adults: absolute versus relative measures and their respective association with health conditions and multimorbidity.

René Maréchal, Ahmed Ghachem, Isabelle J Dionne
{"title":"Sedentary time in older adults: absolute versus relative measures and their respective association with health conditions and multimorbidity.","authors":"René Maréchal, Ahmed Ghachem, Isabelle J Dionne","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults (OA) accumulate a greater amount of sedentary time (ST) compared to other subgroups of the population, which is associated with deleterious effects on multiple health outcomes and mortality. This study compared absolute sedentary behavior time (ASBT), which is generally used in studies, to relative SB time (RSBT), defined as the percentage of daily wake time, for their respective association with health conditions and multimorbidity. Two-thousand-four-hundred-sixty-one older adults (65-79 years) participated in the Canadian Health Measures Survey (2007-2017) and wore an accelerometer for ≥4 days, including a weekend day. Information regarding six health condition categories was extracted: cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic, musculoskeletal, psychological, and pulmonary. We combined these health conditions to create a multimorbidity variable. Participants were divided into ASBT quartiles and RSBT quartiles. Comparing the most sedentary (Q4) to the least sedentary (Q1) groups, we found no significant associations with any health conditions for ASBT. However, the same comparison for RSBT showed that RSBT-Q4 (the most sedentary; <i>n</i> = 660), compared to RSBT-Q1 (<i>n</i> = 660), was associated with a significant (<i>p</i> < 0.01) greater prevalence of cancer (160 > 110), cardiovascular (422 > 326), metabolic (276 > 194), and musculoskeletal (407 > 345), as well as multimorbidity (462 > 350). After adjusting for confounding factors (moderate to vigorous physical activity, housing, income, education level, relationship status, accelerometer wear season, and status of drinking and smoking), these associations persisted with the exception of musculoskeletal conditions. These results demonstrate that RSBT could be more appropriate to capture the association between a sedentary lifestyle and health profiles in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults (OA) accumulate a greater amount of sedentary time (ST) compared to other subgroups of the population, which is associated with deleterious effects on multiple health outcomes and mortality. This study compared absolute sedentary behavior time (ASBT), which is generally used in studies, to relative SB time (RSBT), defined as the percentage of daily wake time, for their respective association with health conditions and multimorbidity. Two-thousand-four-hundred-sixty-one older adults (65-79 years) participated in the Canadian Health Measures Survey (2007-2017) and wore an accelerometer for ≥4 days, including a weekend day. Information regarding six health condition categories was extracted: cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic, musculoskeletal, psychological, and pulmonary. We combined these health conditions to create a multimorbidity variable. Participants were divided into ASBT quartiles and RSBT quartiles. Comparing the most sedentary (Q4) to the least sedentary (Q1) groups, we found no significant associations with any health conditions for ASBT. However, the same comparison for RSBT showed that RSBT-Q4 (the most sedentary; n = 660), compared to RSBT-Q1 (n = 660), was associated with a significant (p < 0.01) greater prevalence of cancer (160 > 110), cardiovascular (422 > 326), metabolic (276 > 194), and musculoskeletal (407 > 345), as well as multimorbidity (462 > 350). After adjusting for confounding factors (moderate to vigorous physical activity, housing, income, education level, relationship status, accelerometer wear season, and status of drinking and smoking), these associations persisted with the exception of musculoskeletal conditions. These results demonstrate that RSBT could be more appropriate to capture the association between a sedentary lifestyle and health profiles in older adults.

老年人久坐时间:绝对与相对测量及其与健康状况和多病的相关性
与人口的其他亚群相比,老年人(OA)积累了更多的久坐时间(ST),这与多种健康结果和死亡率的有害影响有关。本研究比较了研究中通常使用的绝对久坐行为时间(ASBT)和相对SB时间(RSBT),定义为每天清醒时间的百分比,它们各自与健康状况和多重疾病的关系。261名老年人(65至79岁)参加了加拿大健康措施调查(2007-2017),佩戴加速度计≥4天,包括周末一天。提取了有关六类健康状况的信息:癌症、心血管疾病、代谢疾病、肌肉骨骼疾病、心理疾病和肺病。我们将这些健康状况结合起来,创造了一个多病变量。参与者被分为ASBT四分位数和RSBT四分位数。比较久坐(Q4)组和最少久坐(Q1)组,我们发现ASBT与任何健康状况没有显著关联。然而,同样对RSBT的比较显示,RSBT- q4(最久坐;n=660),与RSBT-Q1 (n=660)相比,与显著(p110)、心血管(422>326)、代谢(276>194)和肌肉骨骼(407>345)以及多发病(462>350)相关。在调整了混杂因素(中度至剧烈体育活动、住房、收入、教育水平、关系状况、加速度计佩戴季节、饮酒和吸烟状况)后,这些关联仍然存在,但肌肉骨骼状况除外。这些结果表明,RSBT可能更适合捕捉久坐不动的生活方式与老年人健康状况之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信