Transpedicular approach for circumferential decompression and separation surgery as a safe and effective way to maximize surgical treatment for spinal metastases: a multicentric study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giuseppe Di Perna, Marco Ajello, Antonio Colamaria, Francesco Carbone, Augusto Leone, Fulvio Tartara, Nicola Marengo, Uwe Spetzger, Diego Garbossa, Fabio Cofano
{"title":"Transpedicular approach for circumferential decompression and separation surgery as a safe and effective way to maximize surgical treatment for spinal metastases: a multicentric study.","authors":"Giuseppe Di Perna, Marco Ajello, Antonio Colamaria, Francesco Carbone, Augusto Leone, Fulvio Tartara, Nicola Marengo, Uwe Spetzger, Diego Garbossa, Fabio Cofano","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surgery for spinal metastases has undergone multiple transformations in operative technique, with the goal of enhancing local disease control and facilitating adjuvant therapies. The transpedicular approach offers a minimally invasive strategy for achieving circumferential spinal cord decompression, optimizing conditions for high-dose radiation therapies such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and safe cytoreduction. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the transpedicular approach in achieving 360° spinal cord decompression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentric retrospective observational study, the medical records of symptomatic patients who underwent circumferential decompression of the dural sac for spinal metastases between January 2018 and June 2023 were analyzed. Assessed data included perioperative complications and clinical outcomes in terms of neurological function and axial pain. Neurological status was evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale and modified Medical Research Council scale. Radiological assessments included epidural spinal cord compression grading and the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify predictors of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Circumferential decompression was successfully achieved in all cases. Neurological improvement was observed in 76.3% of patients at discharge, with sustained functional benefits at a mean follow-up of 19.2 months. Postoperative pain improved in 84.2% of patients. A significant association was found between immediate postoperative neurological improvement and long-term outcomes (p = 0.004). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that immediate postoperative improvement significantly reduced the likelihood of deterioration at the last follow-up [Nagelkerke R2 = 0.135, Exp(B) = 0.208; p = 0.004]. The total complication rate was 9.8%. Complications included CSF leaks (2.8%), wound infections (1.9%), and low rates of neurological deterioration (0.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The transpedicular approach provides a safe and effective route for circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic spinal disease. It minimizes perioperative risks, facilitates high-dose radiation therapy, and achieves favorable neurological and pain outcomes in thoracic and lumbar locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 5","pages":"E7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Surgery for spinal metastases has undergone multiple transformations in operative technique, with the goal of enhancing local disease control and facilitating adjuvant therapies. The transpedicular approach offers a minimally invasive strategy for achieving circumferential spinal cord decompression, optimizing conditions for high-dose radiation therapies such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and safe cytoreduction. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the transpedicular approach in achieving 360° spinal cord decompression.

Methods: In this multicentric retrospective observational study, the medical records of symptomatic patients who underwent circumferential decompression of the dural sac for spinal metastases between January 2018 and June 2023 were analyzed. Assessed data included perioperative complications and clinical outcomes in terms of neurological function and axial pain. Neurological status was evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale and modified Medical Research Council scale. Radiological assessments included epidural spinal cord compression grading and the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify predictors of outcomes.

Results: Circumferential decompression was successfully achieved in all cases. Neurological improvement was observed in 76.3% of patients at discharge, with sustained functional benefits at a mean follow-up of 19.2 months. Postoperative pain improved in 84.2% of patients. A significant association was found between immediate postoperative neurological improvement and long-term outcomes (p = 0.004). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that immediate postoperative improvement significantly reduced the likelihood of deterioration at the last follow-up [Nagelkerke R2 = 0.135, Exp(B) = 0.208; p = 0.004]. The total complication rate was 9.8%. Complications included CSF leaks (2.8%), wound infections (1.9%), and low rates of neurological deterioration (0.9%).

Conclusions: The transpedicular approach provides a safe and effective route for circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic spinal disease. It minimizes perioperative risks, facilitates high-dose radiation therapy, and achieves favorable neurological and pain outcomes in thoracic and lumbar locations.

经椎弓根入路行环周减压分离手术是一种安全有效的方法,可以最大限度地提高脊柱转移的手术治疗:一项多中心研究。
目的:脊柱转移手术在手术技术上经历了多次转变,目的是加强局部疾病控制,促进辅助治疗。经椎弓根入路为实现脊髓周向减压提供了一种微创策略,优化了立体定向体放射治疗和安全细胞减少等高剂量放射治疗的条件。本研究旨在评估经椎弓根入路实现360°脊髓减压的安全性和有效性。方法:在这项多中心回顾性观察研究中,分析2018年1月至2023年6月期间接受硬膜囊周向减压治疗脊柱转移的有症状患者的病历。评估数据包括围手术期并发症以及神经功能和轴向疼痛方面的临床结果。采用美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表和改良的医学研究委员会量表评估神经系统状况。放射学评估包括硬膜外脊髓压迫分级和脊柱不稳定肿瘤评分。进行统计分析以确定结果的预测因子。结果:所有病例均成功完成周向减压。76.3%的患者出院时神经系统改善,平均随访19.2个月,功能持续改善。84.2%的患者术后疼痛得到改善。术后即时神经系统改善与长期预后之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.004)。单因素logistic回归分析显示,术后立即改善可显著降低末次随访时恶化的可能性[Nagelkerke R2 = 0.135, Exp(B) = 0.208;P = 0.004]。总并发症发生率为9.8%。并发症包括脑脊液渗漏(2.8%)、伤口感染(1.9%)和低神经功能恶化率(0.9%)。结论:经椎弓根入路为转移性脊柱疾病的脊髓环周减压提供了一种安全有效的入路。它最大限度地降低围手术期风险,促进高剂量放射治疗,并在胸腰椎部位获得良好的神经学和疼痛结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信