Effects of exercise on glycolipid metabolism in adolescents with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.19365
Xinyu Fan, Weihao Sun, Song Gu
{"title":"Effects of exercise on glycolipid metabolism in adolescents with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Xinyu Fan, Weihao Sun, Song Gu","doi":"10.7717/peerj.19365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of exercise intervention on glycolipid metabolism in overweight and obese adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials were conducted. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered (ID: CRD42024623686). Electronic searches were performed using the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase. Randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions were included. Data on fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FINS), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) before and after exercise interventions were extracted for overweight and obese adolescents. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated to compare differences between exercise and conventional control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess whether effects differed by exercise type, intervention duration, supervision, and intervention frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 984 participants (576 in experimental groups and 408 in control groups) were included across 26 studies. The analysis revealed that exercise interventions significantly improved key metabolic parameters: FBG (SMD: -0.42 95% CI [-0.73 to -0.12]), FINS (SMD: -0.81 95% CI [-1.13 to -0.49]), TC (SMD: -0.18 95% CI [-0.34 to -0.01]), TG (SMD: -0.46 95% CI [-0.56 to -0.25]), LDL-C (SMD: -0.28 95% CI [-0.44 to -0.12]), and HDL-C (SMD: 0.26 95% CI [0.11-0.40]). Subgroup analysis indicated that exercise type, supervision and intervention frequency influenced the effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis suggests that exercise interventions improve glycolipid metabolism in adolescents with overweight and obesity. Continuous endurance training demonstrated greater efficacy in improving blood glucose parameters, whereas hybrid-type exercise showed advantages in improving lipid metabolism. Engaging in three supervised training sessions weekly may be the optimal approach to enhance glycolipid metabolism in obese adolescents. These findings provide evidence for clinicians and healthcare professionals (<i>e.g</i>., exercise physiologists, physical therapists) to guide exercise prescriptions for obese adolescents, thereby preventing worsening metabolic imbalances.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e19365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of exercise intervention on glycolipid metabolism in overweight and obese adolescents.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials were conducted. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered (ID: CRD42024623686). Electronic searches were performed using the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase. Randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions were included. Data on fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FINS), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) before and after exercise interventions were extracted for overweight and obese adolescents. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated to compare differences between exercise and conventional control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess whether effects differed by exercise type, intervention duration, supervision, and intervention frequency.

Results: A total of 984 participants (576 in experimental groups and 408 in control groups) were included across 26 studies. The analysis revealed that exercise interventions significantly improved key metabolic parameters: FBG (SMD: -0.42 95% CI [-0.73 to -0.12]), FINS (SMD: -0.81 95% CI [-1.13 to -0.49]), TC (SMD: -0.18 95% CI [-0.34 to -0.01]), TG (SMD: -0.46 95% CI [-0.56 to -0.25]), LDL-C (SMD: -0.28 95% CI [-0.44 to -0.12]), and HDL-C (SMD: 0.26 95% CI [0.11-0.40]). Subgroup analysis indicated that exercise type, supervision and intervention frequency influenced the effectiveness.

Conclusion: The analysis suggests that exercise interventions improve glycolipid metabolism in adolescents with overweight and obesity. Continuous endurance training demonstrated greater efficacy in improving blood glucose parameters, whereas hybrid-type exercise showed advantages in improving lipid metabolism. Engaging in three supervised training sessions weekly may be the optimal approach to enhance glycolipid metabolism in obese adolescents. These findings provide evidence for clinicians and healthcare professionals (e.g., exercise physiologists, physical therapists) to guide exercise prescriptions for obese adolescents, thereby preventing worsening metabolic imbalances.

运动对超重和肥胖青少年糖脂代谢的影响:26项随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本荟萃分析的目的是探讨运动干预对超重和肥胖青少年糖脂代谢的影响。方法:对随机试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。该综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并已注册(ID: CRD42024623686)。电子检索使用以下数据库:Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane和Embase。包括运动干预的随机对照试验。提取超重和肥胖青少年在运动干预前后的空腹血糖(FBG)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具来评估证据的质量。计算标准化平均差异(SMDs)来比较运动组和常规对照组之间的差异。进行亚组分析以评估运动类型、干预持续时间、监督和干预频率是否有不同的效果。结果:26项研究共纳入984名参与者(实验组576人,对照组408人)。分析显示,运动干预显著改善了关键代谢参数:FBG (SMD: -0.42 95% CI[-0.73至-0.12])、FINS (SMD: -0.81 95% CI[-1.13至-0.49])、TC (SMD: -0.18 95% CI[-0.34至-0.01])、TG (SMD: -0.46 95% CI[-0.56至-0.25])、LDL-C (SMD: -0.28 95% CI[-0.44至-0.12])和HDL-C (SMD: 0.26 95% CI[0.11-0.40])。亚组分析表明,运动类型、监督和干预频率对运动效果有影响。结论:运动干预可改善超重和肥胖青少年的糖脂代谢。持续耐力训练在改善血糖参数方面表现出更大的功效,而混合型运动在改善脂质代谢方面表现出优势。每周进行三次有监督的训练可能是提高肥胖青少年糖脂代谢的最佳途径。这些发现为临床医生和医疗保健专业人员(如运动生理学家、物理治疗师)指导肥胖青少年的运动处方提供了证据,从而防止代谢失衡恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信