Immediate diaphragmatic relaxation effect on mobility and pain threshold in smartphone users with non-specific cervical spine pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Q4 Medicine
Agata Czępińska, Magdalena Zawadka, Izabela Dąbkowska
{"title":"Immediate diaphragmatic relaxation effect on mobility and pain threshold in smartphone users with non-specific cervical spine pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Agata Czępińska, Magdalena Zawadka, Izabela Dąbkowska","doi":"10.36740/WLek/202427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: To compare the manual diaphragmatic relaxation technique and placebo intervention on selected parameters in the neck in smartphone users with non-specific neck pain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and methods: A randomized placebo-controlled trial included 38 women. Neck range of motion and pressure pain threshold were assessed in participants who were assigned to the Therapy group or a Placebo group. The intervention consisted of a single manual relaxation of the diaphragm in the supine position. Repeat measurements were taken after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: There was a statistically significant effect of therapy on range of motion in both studied groups (p < 0.001; partial η2= 0.58. Statistically significant improvement in the range of motion concerned three planes of movement and all analyzed measurements. There were no statistically significant differences in range of motion between groups. Comparison of pressure pain threshold at the level of the 4th cervical vertebra before and after therapy showed significant differences only in the Therapy group (p=0.04, d=0.45). No statistically significant differences in pressure pain threshold were found between the groups either before or after therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: Global summary of results does not allow for drawing final conclusions regarding the effect of manual diaphragm release on neck parameters in smartphone users with non-specific neck pain, taking into account the results of other researchers, diaphragm therapy is recommended for people with neck pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"78 3","pages":"522-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/202427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: To compare the manual diaphragmatic relaxation technique and placebo intervention on selected parameters in the neck in smartphone users with non-specific neck pain.

Patients and methods: Materials and methods: A randomized placebo-controlled trial included 38 women. Neck range of motion and pressure pain threshold were assessed in participants who were assigned to the Therapy group or a Placebo group. The intervention consisted of a single manual relaxation of the diaphragm in the supine position. Repeat measurements were taken after the intervention.

Results: Results: There was a statistically significant effect of therapy on range of motion in both studied groups (p < 0.001; partial η2= 0.58. Statistically significant improvement in the range of motion concerned three planes of movement and all analyzed measurements. There were no statistically significant differences in range of motion between groups. Comparison of pressure pain threshold at the level of the 4th cervical vertebra before and after therapy showed significant differences only in the Therapy group (p=0.04, d=0.45). No statistically significant differences in pressure pain threshold were found between the groups either before or after therapy.

Conclusion: Conclusions: Global summary of results does not allow for drawing final conclusions regarding the effect of manual diaphragm release on neck parameters in smartphone users with non-specific neck pain, taking into account the results of other researchers, diaphragm therapy is recommended for people with neck pain.

即时膈肌放松对智能手机用户非特异性颈椎疼痛的活动能力和痛阈的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
目的:比较手动膈肌放松技术与安慰剂干预对非特异性颈痛智能手机用户颈部部分参数的影响。患者和方法:材料和方法:一项随机安慰剂对照试验,包括38名妇女。在被分配到治疗组或安慰剂组的参与者中评估颈部活动范围和压力痛阈。干预包括在仰卧位时单次手动放松膈肌。干预后进行重复测量。结果:治疗对两组患者活动度的影响均有统计学意义(p < 0.001;偏η2= 0.58。统计上显著改善的运动范围涉及三个运动平面和所有分析测量。两组患者的活动范围无统计学差异。治疗前后第4颈椎水平压痛阈值比较,只有治疗组差异有统计学意义(p=0.04, d=0.45)。治疗前后两组间压痛阈值差异无统计学意义。结论:结论:对于非特异性颈部疼痛的智能手机用户,手动释放横膈膜对颈部参数的影响并不能得出最终结论,考虑到其他研究者的结果,建议对颈部疼痛患者进行横膈膜治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信