Age and Sex Adenoma Detection Rates in Colonoscopy and Optimization of Screening Age: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Burak Sakar, Osman Zekai Oner, Ali Celik, Omer Celik, Turan Can Yıldız, Ugur Dogan, Onur Ilkay Dincer
{"title":"Age and Sex Adenoma Detection Rates in Colonoscopy and Optimization of Screening Age: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Burak Sakar, Osman Zekai Oner, Ali Celik, Omer Celik, Turan Can Yıldız, Ugur Dogan, Onur Ilkay Dincer","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study aimed to contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the optimal age to initiate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by evaluating adenoma detection rates (ADRs) across different age and sex groups and to explore whether national screening guidelines should be revised in line with international trends. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this single-center, retrospective observational study, 1216 average-risk patients who underwent colonoscopy between January and December 2024 were analyzed. The patients were stratified into three age groups: Group 1 (40-44 years), Group 2 (45-49 years), and Group 3 (50-54 years). ADR, advanced neoplasia detection rate (ADNR), ADR by sex, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, and withdrawal times were evaluated. Patients with a history of polypectomy, family history of CRC, incomplete colonoscopy, or inadequate bowel preparation (BBPS score <6) were excluded. Group comparisons were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, with <i>P</i> < .05 considered statistically significant. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall ADR and ADNR were 20.8% and 2.6%, respectively. ADRs by group were 7.6%, 15.8%, and 18.9% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A significant difference was found between Groups 1 and 2 (<i>P</i> = .032) but not between Groups 2 and 3 (<i>P</i> = .55). ADR was significantly higher in males (30.2%) than in females (13.1%; <i>P</i> < .001). ADNR was also higher in males (3.7%) than in females (1.8%; <i>P</i> = .048). All patients had withdrawal times >6 minutes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> ADR significantly increased from age 45, supporting the potential need to lower the CRC screening age and consider sex-specific strategies. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the optimal age to initiate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by evaluating adenoma detection rates (ADRs) across different age and sex groups and to explore whether national screening guidelines should be revised in line with international trends. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective observational study, 1216 average-risk patients who underwent colonoscopy between January and December 2024 were analyzed. The patients were stratified into three age groups: Group 1 (40-44 years), Group 2 (45-49 years), and Group 3 (50-54 years). ADR, advanced neoplasia detection rate (ADNR), ADR by sex, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, and withdrawal times were evaluated. Patients with a history of polypectomy, family history of CRC, incomplete colonoscopy, or inadequate bowel preparation (BBPS score <6) were excluded. Group comparisons were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, with P < .05 considered statistically significant. Results: Overall ADR and ADNR were 20.8% and 2.6%, respectively. ADRs by group were 7.6%, 15.8%, and 18.9% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A significant difference was found between Groups 1 and 2 (P = .032) but not between Groups 2 and 3 (P = .55). ADR was significantly higher in males (30.2%) than in females (13.1%; P < .001). ADNR was also higher in males (3.7%) than in females (1.8%; P = .048). All patients had withdrawal times >6 minutes. Conclusion: ADR significantly increased from age 45, supporting the potential need to lower the CRC screening age and consider sex-specific strategies. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted.

结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率及筛选年龄的优化:回顾性分析。
背景:本研究旨在通过评估不同年龄和性别群体的腺瘤检出率(adr)来探讨开始结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的最佳年龄,并探讨国家筛查指南是否应根据国际趋势进行修订。方法:在这项单中心、回顾性观察性研究中,对2024年1月至12月接受结肠镜检查的1216例平均风险患者进行了分析。患者分为3个年龄组:1组(40-44岁)、2组(45-49岁)和3组(50-54岁)。评估不良反应(ADR)、晚期肿瘤检出率(ADNR)、性别不良反应(ADR)、波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评分和停药时间。息肉切除术史、结直肠癌家族史、结肠镜检查不完全或肠道准备不充分的患者(BBPS评分P < 0.05)认为具有统计学意义。结果:总ADR和ADNR分别为20.8%和2.6%。各组adr分别为7.6%、15.8%、18.9%。第1组与第2组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.032),第2组与第3组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.55)。男性(30.2%)明显高于女性(13.1%);P < 0.001)。男性的ADNR(3.7%)高于女性(1.8%);P = .048)。所有患者的停药时间均为60分钟。结论:从45岁开始,不良反应显著增加,支持降低结直肠癌筛查年龄和考虑性别特异性策略的潜在需求。进一步的前瞻性多中心研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信