Feasibility and Acceptability of Telephone-Administered Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements and the Rehabilitation Needs Survey in Community-Dwelling Adults Exposed to the United States Criminal Legal System.

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2024.0158
Casey LaDuke, Kabrianna Tamura, Micaela Linder, Ronald Day, Kristen Dams-O'Connor
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Telephone-Administered Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements and the Rehabilitation Needs Survey in Community-Dwelling Adults Exposed to the United States Criminal Legal System.","authors":"Casey LaDuke, Kabrianna Tamura, Micaela Linder, Ronald Day, Kristen Dams-O'Connor","doi":"10.1089/neur.2024.0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common among legally-impacted adults and has also been linked to negative outcomes throughout the criminal legal system. Despite this, relatively limited TBI research has focused on or even included legally-impacted adults. Existing literature in this population has used heterogeneous TBI definitions, populations, and measures when studying outcomes. This study therefore investigates the feasibility and acceptability of telephone-administered TBI common data elements (CDEs) and the Rehabilitation Needs Survey (RNS) in 85 legally-impacted community-dwelling adults. Regarding feasibility, completion rates across measures were high (88-100%), and noncompletion was most commonly due to participants declining to continue. Regarding acceptability, data collectors were able to administer and code most measures with relative ease. Reported difficulties related to measures requiring detailed data collector training to administer and code, such as the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire (BISQ) and Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone, or challenges inherent to self-report tests in general. In addition, data collectors recommended adding specific questions to the BISQ to query head injuries experienced during or as a result of their exposure to the criminal legal system. Overall, results support the use of telephone-administered TBI CDEs and the RNS in legally-impacted adults, and underscore the need for culturally-responsive training and technical assistance for TBI researchers engaging with this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"274-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2024.0158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common among legally-impacted adults and has also been linked to negative outcomes throughout the criminal legal system. Despite this, relatively limited TBI research has focused on or even included legally-impacted adults. Existing literature in this population has used heterogeneous TBI definitions, populations, and measures when studying outcomes. This study therefore investigates the feasibility and acceptability of telephone-administered TBI common data elements (CDEs) and the Rehabilitation Needs Survey (RNS) in 85 legally-impacted community-dwelling adults. Regarding feasibility, completion rates across measures were high (88-100%), and noncompletion was most commonly due to participants declining to continue. Regarding acceptability, data collectors were able to administer and code most measures with relative ease. Reported difficulties related to measures requiring detailed data collector training to administer and code, such as the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire (BISQ) and Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone, or challenges inherent to self-report tests in general. In addition, data collectors recommended adding specific questions to the BISQ to query head injuries experienced during or as a result of their exposure to the criminal legal system. Overall, results support the use of telephone-administered TBI CDEs and the RNS in legally-impacted adults, and underscore the need for culturally-responsive training and technical assistance for TBI researchers engaging with this population.

电话管理的创伤性脑损伤的可行性和可接受性,共同数据元素和社区居住成年人暴露于美国刑事法律制度的康复需求调查。
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)在受法律影响的成年人中很常见,并且在整个刑事法律体系中也与负面结果有关。尽管如此,相对有限的TBI研究集中在甚至包括受法律影响的成年人。在研究结果时,该人群的现有文献使用了异质TBI定义、人群和测量方法。因此,本研究在85名受法律影响的社区居住成年人中调查了电话管理的TBI共同数据元素(CDEs)和康复需求调查(RNS)的可行性和可接受性。关于可行性,测量的完成率很高(88-100%),不完成最常见的原因是参与者拒绝继续。关于可接受性,数据收集人员能够相对轻松地管理和编写大多数度量。报告的困难与需要详细的数据收集人员培训来管理和编码的措施有关,如脑损伤筛查问卷(BISQ)和通过电话进行的成人认知简短测试,或一般自我报告测试固有的挑战。此外,数据收集人员建议在BISQ中增加具体问题,以查询他们在刑事法律制度下或因刑事法律制度而遭受的头部伤害。总的来说,研究结果支持在受法律影响的成年人中使用电话管理的TBI CDEs和RNS,并强调需要对与这一人群接触的TBI研究人员进行文化响应性培训和技术援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信