Head-to-head relief: ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant in migraine treatment.

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lanfranco Pellesi, Budour Jedie, Fadia Barhum, Samah Al-Abdullah, Paolo Martelletti, Zheman Xiao
{"title":"Head-to-head relief: ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant in migraine treatment.","authors":"Lanfranco Pellesi, Budour Jedie, Fadia Barhum, Samah Al-Abdullah, Paolo Martelletti, Zheman Xiao","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2494494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Migraine, a significant cause of disability worldwide, heavily impacts daily functioning and quality of life. Despite various acute treatment options, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans, patients experience limited relief or adverse effects. This review examines the efficacy and safety of gepants - ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant - in the acute treatment of migraine. We assessed phase II and III clinical trials, focusing on clinically relevant endpoints such as pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at two hours post-treatment. We calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve significant endpoints for each gepant. Gepants are recommended for the acute treatment of migraine in individuals who do not respond to triptan monotherapy or combination therapy, who experience only partial effectiveness, or who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to triptans. The NNT values for achieving pain freedom at two hours were 9 for rimegepant, 11 for zavegepant, and 12 for ubrogepant, which are comparable to NSAIDs such as naproxen (NNT = 11). Paracetamol, although not an NSAID, showed similar efficacy (NNT = 12). Triptans demonstrated lower NNTs, indicating higher efficacy. Gepants offer effective, well-tolerated alternatives with no significant cardiovascular risk and minimal potential for medication-overuse headache.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2494494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Migraine, a significant cause of disability worldwide, heavily impacts daily functioning and quality of life. Despite various acute treatment options, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans, patients experience limited relief or adverse effects. This review examines the efficacy and safety of gepants - ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant - in the acute treatment of migraine. We assessed phase II and III clinical trials, focusing on clinically relevant endpoints such as pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at two hours post-treatment. We calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve significant endpoints for each gepant. Gepants are recommended for the acute treatment of migraine in individuals who do not respond to triptan monotherapy or combination therapy, who experience only partial effectiveness, or who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to triptans. The NNT values for achieving pain freedom at two hours were 9 for rimegepant, 11 for zavegepant, and 12 for ubrogepant, which are comparable to NSAIDs such as naproxen (NNT = 11). Paracetamol, although not an NSAID, showed similar efficacy (NNT = 12). Triptans demonstrated lower NNTs, indicating higher efficacy. Gepants offer effective, well-tolerated alternatives with no significant cardiovascular risk and minimal potential for medication-overuse headache.

头对头缓解:ubrogevent, rimegevent和zaveggevent在偏头痛治疗中的应用。
偏头痛是世界范围内导致残疾的一个重要原因,严重影响日常功能和生活质量。尽管有多种急性治疗选择,包括非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和曲坦类药物,但患者的缓解或不良反应有限。这篇综述探讨了孕激素(ubrogepant)、rimegepant和zavegepant)在急性偏头痛治疗中的有效性和安全性。我们评估了II期和III期临床试验,重点关注临床相关终点,如治疗后两小时的疼痛缓解和最麻烦症状的缓解。我们计算了治疗所需的数量(NNT),以达到每个患者的显著终点。对于曲坦类药物单药治疗或联合治疗无效、仅部分有效、不能耐受曲坦类药物或有曲坦类药物禁忌症的患者,推荐使用Gepants进行急性偏头痛治疗。在2小时内实现疼痛解除的NNT值为:利莫吉宁为9,扎维吉宁为11,孕吉宁为12,与萘普生等非甾体抗炎药相当(NNT = 11)。扑热息痛虽然不是非甾体抗炎药,但疗效相似(NNT = 12)。曲坦类表现出较低的nnt,表明更高的疗效。Gepants提供了有效的、耐受性良好的替代方案,没有显著的心血管风险,并且药物过度使用头痛的可能性最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信