Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Statement on the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in Infants.

April Killikelly, Winnie Siu, Nicholas Brousseau
{"title":"Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Statement on the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in Infants.","authors":"April Killikelly, Winnie Siu, Nicholas Brousseau","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v51i04a01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunization programs for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants have been available in Canada since the authorization of palivizumab in 2002. However, these programs have been limited to only those infants at highest risk for severe RSV disease. The authorization of new passive immunizing products to prevent RSV, including a new monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab) and a vaccine administered in pregnancy (RSV pre-fusion stabilized F protein; RSVpreF) offers the opportunity to prevent RSV in more Canadian infants. The objective of this article is to summarize guidance from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) on the prevention of RSV in infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NACI established key policy questions and performed an evidence review and synthesis. NACI made evidence-based recommendations in consideration of the burden of illness to be prevented, safety and efficacy of the new immunizing products, economic evidence and ethics, equity, feasibility, and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nirsevimab and RSVpreF offer protection against severe outcomes of RSV disease, including hospitalization and intensive care unit admission. Nirsevimab protection may be slightly higher and may last longer than protection offered by RSVpreF. Nirsevimab and RSVpreF also have a similar frequency of adverse reactions for both pregnant and infant participants. The RSVpreF vaccine may increase the risk of severe local adverse events compared to placebo for pregnant recipients. In RSVpreF clinical trials, an imbalance was observed in late preterm birth between RSVpreF and placebo recipients. It is unclear whether there is a causal relation with the vaccine as the currently available data is inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on new evidence, NACI recommends building towards a universal RSV immunization program for all infants. Currently, nirsevimab is preferred over RSVpreF. Program introduction could occur in stages depending on access to supply, cost effectiveness, and affordability of available options.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":"51 4","pages":"113-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v51i04a01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immunization programs for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants have been available in Canada since the authorization of palivizumab in 2002. However, these programs have been limited to only those infants at highest risk for severe RSV disease. The authorization of new passive immunizing products to prevent RSV, including a new monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab) and a vaccine administered in pregnancy (RSV pre-fusion stabilized F protein; RSVpreF) offers the opportunity to prevent RSV in more Canadian infants. The objective of this article is to summarize guidance from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) on the prevention of RSV in infants.

Methods: NACI established key policy questions and performed an evidence review and synthesis. NACI made evidence-based recommendations in consideration of the burden of illness to be prevented, safety and efficacy of the new immunizing products, economic evidence and ethics, equity, feasibility, and acceptability.

Results: Nirsevimab and RSVpreF offer protection against severe outcomes of RSV disease, including hospitalization and intensive care unit admission. Nirsevimab protection may be slightly higher and may last longer than protection offered by RSVpreF. Nirsevimab and RSVpreF also have a similar frequency of adverse reactions for both pregnant and infant participants. The RSVpreF vaccine may increase the risk of severe local adverse events compared to placebo for pregnant recipients. In RSVpreF clinical trials, an imbalance was observed in late preterm birth between RSVpreF and placebo recipients. It is unclear whether there is a causal relation with the vaccine as the currently available data is inconclusive.

Conclusion: Based on new evidence, NACI recommends building towards a universal RSV immunization program for all infants. Currently, nirsevimab is preferred over RSVpreF. Program introduction could occur in stages depending on access to supply, cost effectiveness, and affordability of available options.

国家免疫咨询委员会(NACI)关于预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的声明摘要。
背景:自2002年帕利珠单抗获得批准以来,加拿大已经有了预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的免疫规划。然而,这些项目仅限于那些患有严重呼吸道合胞病毒疾病风险最高的婴儿。批准新的被动免疫产品预防RSV,包括一种新的单克隆抗体(nirsevimab)和一种妊娠期接种的疫苗(RSV预融合稳定F蛋白;RSVpreF)为更多加拿大婴儿提供了预防RSV的机会。本文的目的是总结国家免疫咨询委员会(NACI)关于预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒的指导意见。方法:建立关键政策问题,并进行证据回顾和综合。考虑到需要预防的疾病负担、新免疫产品的安全性和有效性、经济证据和伦理、公平性、可行性和可接受性,国家免疫研究所提出了基于证据的建议。结果:Nirsevimab和RSVpreF可预防RSV疾病的严重后果,包括住院和重症监护病房入住。Nirsevimab的保护可能比RSVpreF提供的保护略高,持续时间可能更长。Nirsevimab和RSVpreF在孕妇和婴儿参与者中也有相似的不良反应频率。与安慰剂相比,RSVpreF疫苗可能会增加孕妇接种者发生严重局部不良事件的风险。在RSVpreF临床试验中,在RSVpreF和安慰剂接受者之间观察到晚期早产的不平衡。目前尚不清楚是否与疫苗有因果关系,因为目前可获得的数据尚无定论。结论:基于新的证据,全国呼吸道感染研究所建议为所有婴儿建立一个普遍的呼吸道合胞病毒免疫规划。目前,nirsevimab优于RSVpreF。项目的引入可以分阶段进行,具体取决于供应的可及性、成本效益和可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信