{"title":"Brief psychological interventions for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Blue Pike, Leire Ambrosio, Lyn Ellett","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725001126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cognitive behavioral therapy for people diagnosed with schizophrenia (CBTp) is recommended in clinical guidelines internationally, rates of implementation are low. One consequence of this has been the development of brief individual psychological interventions, which are shorter than the recommended minimum of 16 sessions for CBTp. This article is the first to systematically identify the brief interventions that exist for people diagnosed with schizophrenia and to determine their effectiveness using meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials or experimental studies of brief individual psychological interventions delivered in community settings. Random effects meta-analysis was used to integrate effect sizes, due to the heterogeneity of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were identified (n = 1,382) that measured thirty clinical outcomes and included six intervention types - brief CBT, memory training, digital motivation support, reasoning training, psychoeducation, and virtual reality. Collectively, brief psychological interventions were found to be effective for psychotic symptoms (SMD -0.285, p < 0.01), paranoia (SMD -0.277, p < 0.05), data gathering (SMD 0.38, p < 0.01), depression (SMD -0.906, p < 0.05) and wellbeing (SMD 0.405, p < 0.01). For intervention types, brief CBT was effective for psychotic symptoms (SMD -0.32, p < .001), and reasoning training was effective for data gathering (SMD 0.38, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the evidence suggests that brief psychological interventions are effective for several key difficulties associated with schizophrenia, providing an opportunity to improve both access to, and choice of, treatment for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e146"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725001126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although cognitive behavioral therapy for people diagnosed with schizophrenia (CBTp) is recommended in clinical guidelines internationally, rates of implementation are low. One consequence of this has been the development of brief individual psychological interventions, which are shorter than the recommended minimum of 16 sessions for CBTp. This article is the first to systematically identify the brief interventions that exist for people diagnosed with schizophrenia and to determine their effectiveness using meta-analysis.
Methods: Five electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials or experimental studies of brief individual psychological interventions delivered in community settings. Random effects meta-analysis was used to integrate effect sizes, due to the heterogeneity of included studies.
Results: Fourteen studies were identified (n = 1,382) that measured thirty clinical outcomes and included six intervention types - brief CBT, memory training, digital motivation support, reasoning training, psychoeducation, and virtual reality. Collectively, brief psychological interventions were found to be effective for psychotic symptoms (SMD -0.285, p < 0.01), paranoia (SMD -0.277, p < 0.05), data gathering (SMD 0.38, p < 0.01), depression (SMD -0.906, p < 0.05) and wellbeing (SMD 0.405, p < 0.01). For intervention types, brief CBT was effective for psychotic symptoms (SMD -0.32, p < .001), and reasoning training was effective for data gathering (SMD 0.38, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Overall, the evidence suggests that brief psychological interventions are effective for several key difficulties associated with schizophrenia, providing an opportunity to improve both access to, and choice of, treatment for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.
期刊介绍:
Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.