Comparison of GFR estimation equations using creatinine, cystatin C, and their combination in pediatric hematology-oncology: no single equation is superior across subgroups.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Katelyn J Phillips, Yilun Sun, Li Tang, Andrew Pappas, Shane J Cross, Jennifer L Pauley, John McCormick, Alejandro R Molinelli, John J Bissler, Anthony M Christensen, Clinton F Stewart
{"title":"Comparison of GFR estimation equations using creatinine, cystatin C, and their combination in pediatric hematology-oncology: no single equation is superior across subgroups.","authors":"Katelyn J Phillips, Yilun Sun, Li Tang, Andrew Pappas, Shane J Cross, Jennifer L Pauley, John McCormick, Alejandro R Molinelli, John J Bissler, Anthony M Christensen, Clinton F Stewart","doi":"10.1007/s00467-025-06765-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate assessment of renal function is essential in treating pediatric patients dosed with nephrotoxic chemotherapy. The validity of the bedside Schwartz, 5-covariate St. Jude (5SJ), CKiD-CysC-U25, combined Cr-CysC-based CysPed, and the serum creatinine-BUN-cystatin C-based CKiD (CKiD Cr-CysC) equations were evaluated in pediatric hematology and oncology patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted comparing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to measured GFR (mGFR) obtained from technetium- 99 m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (<sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA) clearance between January 2016 and May 2022. The influence of corticosteroid use and inflammation in our patient population was evaluated for effect on serum cystatin C (CysC) concentrations and mGFR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All equations agreed within 2 SD of the mean difference with mGFR, but the 5SJ equation had the smallest bias followed closely by the CysPed equation. Overall accuracy (P30) was assessed, and the 5SJ, CKiD Cr-CysC, CysPed, and CKiD-Cys-U25 exhibited comparable performance. In our patient population, we did not observe an effect of corticosteroids (cumulative dosage of > 0.5 mg/kg within the past 14 days) or the presence of inflammation (CRP > 1.2 mg/L) on cystatin C concentrations or mGFR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our pediatric hematology and oncology patient population, no one estimating equation demonstrated superior accuracy and bias overall and in all subgroups. Neither corticosteroid use nor elevated CRP influenced serum CysC concentrations or eGFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19735,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-025-06765-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of renal function is essential in treating pediatric patients dosed with nephrotoxic chemotherapy. The validity of the bedside Schwartz, 5-covariate St. Jude (5SJ), CKiD-CysC-U25, combined Cr-CysC-based CysPed, and the serum creatinine-BUN-cystatin C-based CKiD (CKiD Cr-CysC) equations were evaluated in pediatric hematology and oncology patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted comparing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to measured GFR (mGFR) obtained from technetium- 99 m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99 mTc-DTPA) clearance between January 2016 and May 2022. The influence of corticosteroid use and inflammation in our patient population was evaluated for effect on serum cystatin C (CysC) concentrations and mGFR.

Results: All equations agreed within 2 SD of the mean difference with mGFR, but the 5SJ equation had the smallest bias followed closely by the CysPed equation. Overall accuracy (P30) was assessed, and the 5SJ, CKiD Cr-CysC, CysPed, and CKiD-Cys-U25 exhibited comparable performance. In our patient population, we did not observe an effect of corticosteroids (cumulative dosage of > 0.5 mg/kg within the past 14 days) or the presence of inflammation (CRP > 1.2 mg/L) on cystatin C concentrations or mGFR.

Conclusions: In our pediatric hematology and oncology patient population, no one estimating equation demonstrated superior accuracy and bias overall and in all subgroups. Neither corticosteroid use nor elevated CRP influenced serum CysC concentrations or eGFR.

儿童血液学肿瘤学中使用肌酐、胱抑素C及其组合估算GFR方程的比较:没有单一方程在亚组中具有优越性。
背景:准确评估肾功能是治疗儿童肾毒性化疗患者的必要条件。评估床边Schwartz、5协变量St. Jude (5SJ)、CKiD- cysc - u25、基于Cr-CysC的联合CysPed和基于血清肌酐- bun -胱抑素c的CKiD (CKiD Cr-CysC)方程在儿科血液学和肿瘤学患者中的有效性。方法:回顾性分析比较2016年1月至2022年5月期间估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和测量的GFR (mGFR),这些数据来自锝- 99 m二乙烯三胺五乙酸(99 mTc-DTPA)清除率。在我们的患者群体中,我们评估了皮质类固醇使用和炎症对血清胱抑素C (CysC)浓度和mGFR的影响。结果:所有方程与mGFR的平均差值在2个标准差内一致,但5SJ方程偏差最小,紧跟其后的是CysPed方程。评估了总体准确度(P30), 5SJ、CKiD Cr-CysC、CysPed和CKiD- cys - u25表现出相当的性能。在我们的患者群体中,我们没有观察到皮质类固醇(过去14天内累积剂量> 0.5 mg/kg)或炎症(CRP > 1.2 mg/L)对胱抑素C浓度或mGFR的影响。结论:在我们的儿童血液学和肿瘤学患者群体中,没有一个估计方程在总体和所有亚组中显示出更高的准确性和偏倚。皮质类固醇的使用和CRP升高均不影响血清CysC浓度或eGFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Nephrology
Pediatric Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Pediatric Nephrology Association Pediatric Nephrology publishes original clinical research related to acute and chronic diseases that affect renal function, blood pressure, and fluid and electrolyte disorders in children. Studies may involve medical, surgical, nutritional, physiologic, biochemical, genetic, pathologic or immunologic aspects of disease, imaging techniques or consequences of acute or chronic kidney disease. There are 12 issues per year that contain Editorial Commentaries, Reviews, Educational Reviews, Original Articles, Brief Reports, Rapid Communications, Clinical Quizzes, and Letters to the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信