New technique of end to side two layered and stented duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with omental wrapping during Whipple operation.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hesham A Elmeligy, Ahmed M Azzam, Yousra Ossama, Mahmoud Rady
{"title":"New technique of end to side two layered and stented duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with omental wrapping during Whipple operation.","authors":"Hesham A Elmeligy, Ahmed M Azzam, Yousra Ossama, Mahmoud Rady","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02893-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A leaking pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is typically the cause of major problems following pancreaticoduodenectomy. To stop fistula formation, omental flaps were positioned around the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight individuals who had pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures performed between March 2022 and March 2024 were examined. Based on the placement of a stent and omental flaps around the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, the patients were split into two groups: group A, consisting of twenty-four patients, did not get omental wrapping and stenting, and group B, consisting of twenty-four patients, received omental wrapping with stent inside the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. To evaluate the efficacy of the omental flap operation in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications, perioperative data from both groups was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no discernible variations in the clinical traits of the two groups. Group B experienced considerably lower occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (20.8% vs. 4.2%), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (4.2% vs. 0%), biliary fistula (4.2% vs. 0%), and delayed gastric emptying (12.5% vs. 4.2%). Group B had a considerably lower overall morbidity rate (41.7% vs. 8.3%) and shorter hospital stay (15.3 vs. 10.9 days) than to group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stent and omental flaps around the pancreatic anastomosis can lower the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancrectomy bleeding, and delayed gastric emptying. This straightforward and efficient treatment can decrease the overall morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial registration was recorded as ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier No.: NCT06630910 on 10/05/2024. Our study also adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02893-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A leaking pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is typically the cause of major problems following pancreaticoduodenectomy. To stop fistula formation, omental flaps were positioned around the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis.

Methods: Forty-eight individuals who had pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures performed between March 2022 and March 2024 were examined. Based on the placement of a stent and omental flaps around the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, the patients were split into two groups: group A, consisting of twenty-four patients, did not get omental wrapping and stenting, and group B, consisting of twenty-four patients, received omental wrapping with stent inside the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. To evaluate the efficacy of the omental flap operation in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications, perioperative data from both groups was examined.

Results: There were no discernible variations in the clinical traits of the two groups. Group B experienced considerably lower occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (20.8% vs. 4.2%), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (4.2% vs. 0%), biliary fistula (4.2% vs. 0%), and delayed gastric emptying (12.5% vs. 4.2%). Group B had a considerably lower overall morbidity rate (41.7% vs. 8.3%) and shorter hospital stay (15.3 vs. 10.9 days) than to group A.

Conclusion: Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stent and omental flaps around the pancreatic anastomosis can lower the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancrectomy bleeding, and delayed gastric emptying. This straightforward and efficient treatment can decrease the overall morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Trial registration: The trial registration was recorded as ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier No.: NCT06630910 on 10/05/2024. Our study also adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Whipple手术中网膜包裹的胰空肠粘膜端侧双层支架管吻合术新技术。
背景:胰空肠吻合口漏是胰十二指肠切除术后常见的主要问题。为了阻止瘘管的形成,在胰空肠吻合处周围放置大网膜瓣。方法:对2022年3月至2024年3月间行胰十二指肠切除术的48例患者进行研究。根据在胰空肠吻合口周围放置支架和大网膜皮瓣的情况,将患者分为两组:a组24例患者不进行大网膜包裹支架,B组24例患者在胰空肠吻合口内进行大网膜包裹支架。为了评价网膜瓣手术预防术后胰瘘及其他并发症的疗效,我们对两组患者围手术期资料进行了分析。结果:两组患者的临床特征无明显差异。B组术后胰瘘(20.8% vs. 4.2%)、胰切除术后出血(4.2% vs. 0%)、胆道瘘(4.2% vs. 0%)和胃排空延迟(12.5% vs. 4.2%)的发生率明显较低。B组总发病率明显低于a组(41.7% vs. 8.3%),住院时间明显短于a组(15.3 vs. 10.9天)。结论:胰十二指肠切除术后,胰吻合口周围胰支架和大网膜瓣可降低术后胰瘘、胰切除术后出血和胃排空延迟的风险。这种简单有效的治疗方法可以降低胰十二指肠切除术后的总体发病率。试验注册:试验注册记录为ClinicalTrial.gov标识号。: NCT06630910, 10/05/2024。我们的研究也遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信