Juliana Bonilla-Velez, Caleb M Allred, Peter M Vila, Zainab Farzal, Jake J Lee, Kristy Truong, Xing Wang, Carla V Valenzuela
{"title":"A National Study of Emotional Intelligence Among Otolaryngology Residents and Fellows Using the TEIQue-Short Form.","authors":"Juliana Bonilla-Velez, Caleb M Allred, Peter M Vila, Zainab Farzal, Jake J Lee, Kristy Truong, Xing Wang, Carla V Valenzuela","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Little is known about emotional intelligence (EI) among otolaryngology trainees and its assessment during training. We aim to assess EI levels and identify demographic and training-related factors associated with higher EI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Survey of otolaryngology trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residents and fellows completed a national single-response survey from the Governing Council of the Section for Residents and Fellows-in-Training (November 7 to December 31, 2018). The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form provided a global EI score and subscores for well-being, self-control, emotionality, and sociability. Associations between sociodemographic and training factors with higher scores were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global EI score was high (5.2 ± 0.6). Fellows had higher global EI scores than residents (5.5 vs 5.23; P = .028). Fellows (6.33 vs 5.83; P = .024), trainees older than 35 years (6.17 vs 5.83; P = .021), and those in humanitarian efforts (P = .012) had higher well-being scores. Trainees older than 35 years had higher self-control scores (5.67 vs 5.17; P = .009). Fellows (5.88 vs 5.50; P = .002) and female trainees (5.62 vs 5.38; P = .001) had higher emotionality scores. Trainees with ≥4 publications had higher sociability scores (5.0 vs 4.83; P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Global EI scores were high in this national sample of otolaryngology trainees. Seniority, age, female gender, research experience, and humanitarian involvement were associated with higher scores in specific dimensions. Future studies should evaluate how training experiences or structured educational programs can enhance the development of EI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Little is known about emotional intelligence (EI) among otolaryngology trainees and its assessment during training. We aim to assess EI levels and identify demographic and training-related factors associated with higher EI.
Study design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Survey of otolaryngology trainees.
Methods: Residents and fellows completed a national single-response survey from the Governing Council of the Section for Residents and Fellows-in-Training (November 7 to December 31, 2018). The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form provided a global EI score and subscores for well-being, self-control, emotionality, and sociability. Associations between sociodemographic and training factors with higher scores were assessed.
Results: The global EI score was high (5.2 ± 0.6). Fellows had higher global EI scores than residents (5.5 vs 5.23; P = .028). Fellows (6.33 vs 5.83; P = .024), trainees older than 35 years (6.17 vs 5.83; P = .021), and those in humanitarian efforts (P = .012) had higher well-being scores. Trainees older than 35 years had higher self-control scores (5.67 vs 5.17; P = .009). Fellows (5.88 vs 5.50; P = .002) and female trainees (5.62 vs 5.38; P = .001) had higher emotionality scores. Trainees with ≥4 publications had higher sociability scores (5.0 vs 4.83; P = .001).
Conclusion: Global EI scores were high in this national sample of otolaryngology trainees. Seniority, age, female gender, research experience, and humanitarian involvement were associated with higher scores in specific dimensions. Future studies should evaluate how training experiences or structured educational programs can enhance the development of EI.
目的:对耳鼻喉科学员的情绪智力(EI)及其在培训过程中的评估了解甚少。我们的目标是评估情商水平,并确定与高情商相关的人口统计学和培训相关因素。研究设计:横断面研究。设置:耳鼻喉科学员调查。方法:住院医师和研究员完成了一项由住院医师和在职研究员管理委员会(2018年11月7日至12月31日)进行的全国性单回答调查。特质情商问卷-短表格提供了一个全球的情商得分和幸福感、自我控制、情绪和社交能力的子得分。评估得分较高的社会人口学因素与培训因素之间的关系。结果:整体EI得分较高(5.2±0.6)。研究员的整体情商得分高于住院医师(5.5比5.23;p = .028)。同伴(6.33 vs 5.83;P = 0.024),年龄大于35岁的学员(6.17 vs 5.83;P = 0.021),从事人道主义工作的人(P = 0.012)的幸福感得分更高。年龄大于35岁的学员自我控制得分较高(5.67 vs 5.17;p = .009)。同伴(5.88 vs 5.50;P = .002)和女性受训者(5.62 vs 5.38;P = .001)的情绪得分较高。发表≥4篇论文的受训者社交能力得分更高(5.0 vs 4.83;p = .001)。结论:在这个国家耳鼻喉科学员样本中,全球EI得分较高。资历、年龄、女性性别、研究经验和人道主义参与与特定维度的高分相关。未来的研究应评估培训经验或结构化教育计划如何促进情商的发展。
期刊介绍:
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.