Comparative genomic analysis of paired clinical isolates from a patient with recurrent melioidosis reveals a low within-host mutation rate.

Sruthi Raj, Sreeram Chandra Murthy Peela, Hithesh Kumar, Sudha Ramaiah, Sujatha Sistla
{"title":"Comparative genomic analysis of paired clinical isolates from a patient with recurrent melioidosis reveals a low within-host mutation rate.","authors":"Sruthi Raj, Sreeram Chandra Murthy Peela, Hithesh Kumar, Sudha Ramaiah, Sujatha Sistla","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.002003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Relapse of melioidosis is not uncommon and can occur due to shorter oral antibiotic therapy in the first episode. In such isolates, low mutation rates were identified amongst paired clinical isolates during relapse, but large-scale structural variants were also common.<b>Hypothesis.</b> Using pair-wise comparison, a low number of mutations, especially amongst the virulence and antibiotic resistance genes, may be present amongst the paired isolates obtained during the study period.<b>Aim.</b> A pair of clinical isolates obtained from a patient with recurrent melioidosis during the study period (January 2018 to June 2021) was analysed for identifying the genomic relatedness and DNA changes that may have caused the relapse.<b>Methodology.</b> Using paired-end Illumina sequencing, following appropriate data quality checks, the genomes were assembled using Shovill pipeline, whilst the variants were called using Snippy. Structural variants were detected using TIDDIT, and functional associations were identified using the STRING database searches.<b>Results.</b> One of the isolates (from the second episode) had a highly fragmented genome, but very few structural variants and SNPs were identified. Both the isolates had similar virulence and antibiotic resistance genes; however, owing to the few structural changes, a slightly lower number of virulence genes were observed. Together, they shared 99.8% of the proteomes, and most variants identified spanned either hypothetical proteins or un-annotated regions.<b>Conclusions.</b> Based on comprehensive genome analysis the two strains were genetically similar, with a few structural variants, implying the second episode to be a relapse rather than a re-infection. There was no difference in the antibiotic resistance or virulence genes that may have explained the relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Relapse of melioidosis is not uncommon and can occur due to shorter oral antibiotic therapy in the first episode. In such isolates, low mutation rates were identified amongst paired clinical isolates during relapse, but large-scale structural variants were also common.Hypothesis. Using pair-wise comparison, a low number of mutations, especially amongst the virulence and antibiotic resistance genes, may be present amongst the paired isolates obtained during the study period.Aim. A pair of clinical isolates obtained from a patient with recurrent melioidosis during the study period (January 2018 to June 2021) was analysed for identifying the genomic relatedness and DNA changes that may have caused the relapse.Methodology. Using paired-end Illumina sequencing, following appropriate data quality checks, the genomes were assembled using Shovill pipeline, whilst the variants were called using Snippy. Structural variants were detected using TIDDIT, and functional associations were identified using the STRING database searches.Results. One of the isolates (from the second episode) had a highly fragmented genome, but very few structural variants and SNPs were identified. Both the isolates had similar virulence and antibiotic resistance genes; however, owing to the few structural changes, a slightly lower number of virulence genes were observed. Together, they shared 99.8% of the proteomes, and most variants identified spanned either hypothetical proteins or un-annotated regions.Conclusions. Based on comprehensive genome analysis the two strains were genetically similar, with a few structural variants, implying the second episode to be a relapse rather than a re-infection. There was no difference in the antibiotic resistance or virulence genes that may have explained the relapse.

对来自复发性类鼻疽患者的配对临床分离株的比较基因组分析显示,宿主内突变率低。
介绍。类鼻疽的复发并不罕见,可发生由于较短的口服抗生素治疗在第一次发作。在这些分离株中,在复发期间配对的临床分离株中发现了低突变率,但大规模的结构变异也很常见。使用成对比较,在研究期间获得的成对分离株中可能存在少量突变,特别是在毒力和抗生素抗性基因中。对研究期间(2018年1月至2021年6月)从复发性类鼻疽患者获得的一对临床分离株进行分析,以确定可能导致复发的基因组相关性和DNA变化。使用配对端Illumina测序,在适当的数据质量检查之后,使用Shovill管道组装基因组,而使用Snippy调用变体。使用TIDDIT检测结构变异,使用STRING数据库搜索确定功能关联。其中一个分离株(来自第二次发作)具有高度碎片化的基因组,但很少发现结构变异和snp。两株菌株具有相似的毒力和耐药基因;然而,由于很少的结构变化,观察到的毒力基因数量略少。总之,他们共有99.8%的蛋白质组,大多数变异要么跨越假设的蛋白质,要么跨越未注释的区域。基于全面的基因组分析,这两种菌株在基因上相似,有一些结构变异,这意味着第二次发作是复发而不是再次感染。在抗生素耐药性或毒力基因上没有差异,这可能解释了复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信