Point-of-Care Testing by Multiplex-PCR in Different Compartments in Suspected Lower Respiratory Tract Infection After Lung Transplantation-Results of a Prospective Study.
Susanne Simon, Merle Sophie Kaiser, Marcus Bachmann, Gérard Krause, Jens Gottlieb
{"title":"Point-of-Care Testing by Multiplex-PCR in Different Compartments in Suspected Lower Respiratory Tract Infection After Lung Transplantation-Results of a Prospective Study.","authors":"Susanne Simon, Merle Sophie Kaiser, Marcus Bachmann, Gérard Krause, Jens Gottlieb","doi":"10.1111/tid.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation (LTx). This study evaluated a point-of-care multiplex-PCR testing system (POCTmPCR) for pathogen detection in various respiratory samples from LTx recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective single-center study, LTx recipients with RTI undergoing bronchoscopy were enrolled. Samples from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed by POCTmPCR in conjunction with conventional diagnostics. The primary study endpoint was the concordance of POCTmPCR results between samples (DRKS00032359).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty participants with a median age of 48 years were included; 28 (56%) were previously colonized. Using POCTmPCR, 44 bacterial pathogens were identified in BAL from 30 patients, 49 in sputum (30 patients), and 33 in NPS (17 patients). POCTmPCR identified 24 viral pathogens in BAL from 20 patients, 22 pathogens in sputum of 19 patients, and 19 in NPS of 19 patients. For viral POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity compared to BAL were 84% and 97% in sputum, and 80% and 97% in NPS, respectively. For bacterial POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 67% in sputum, and 37% and 85% in NPS, respectively. POCTmPCR in comparison to conventional workup had a sensitivity of 89% and 80% and specificity of 75% and 76% for viral and bacterial pathogens, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCTmPCR in nasal swabs and sputum may serve as an alternative to BAL for detecting respiratory viruses. Performance for bacterial detection in noninvasive samples was lower. The POCTmPCR system used lacks detection for SARS-CoV-2 and Aspergillus spp.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation (LTx). This study evaluated a point-of-care multiplex-PCR testing system (POCTmPCR) for pathogen detection in various respiratory samples from LTx recipients.
Methods: In a prospective single-center study, LTx recipients with RTI undergoing bronchoscopy were enrolled. Samples from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed by POCTmPCR in conjunction with conventional diagnostics. The primary study endpoint was the concordance of POCTmPCR results between samples (DRKS00032359).
Results: Fifty participants with a median age of 48 years were included; 28 (56%) were previously colonized. Using POCTmPCR, 44 bacterial pathogens were identified in BAL from 30 patients, 49 in sputum (30 patients), and 33 in NPS (17 patients). POCTmPCR identified 24 viral pathogens in BAL from 20 patients, 22 pathogens in sputum of 19 patients, and 19 in NPS of 19 patients. For viral POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity compared to BAL were 84% and 97% in sputum, and 80% and 97% in NPS, respectively. For bacterial POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 67% in sputum, and 37% and 85% in NPS, respectively. POCTmPCR in comparison to conventional workup had a sensitivity of 89% and 80% and specificity of 75% and 76% for viral and bacterial pathogens, respectively.
Conclusion: POCTmPCR in nasal swabs and sputum may serve as an alternative to BAL for detecting respiratory viruses. Performance for bacterial detection in noninvasive samples was lower. The POCTmPCR system used lacks detection for SARS-CoV-2 and Aspergillus spp.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.