Assessing direct transfusion feasibility with syringe-based collection of whole blood from universal donors.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1111/trf.18154
Chet Voelker, Grantham Peltier, Nichelle Crenshaw, Michael Meledeo, Andrew Cap, Nicholas Studer
{"title":"Assessing direct transfusion feasibility with syringe-based collection of whole blood from universal donors.","authors":"Chet Voelker, Grantham Peltier, Nichelle Crenshaw, Michael Meledeo, Andrew Cap, Nicholas Studer","doi":"10.1111/trf.18154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anticipated multidomain operations of future battlefields necessitates minimalistic medical strategies for treatment of combat wounded. Direct transfusion, involving the administration of blood directly from a donor to a recipient, may be a solution for treating hemorrhagic shock patients in an austere environment where the tools to execute clinical practice guidelines are unavailable.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Six participants were enrolled in this observational pilot study. Blood was drawn through medical tubing using a 60 mL syringe and pushed through a second medical tubing set with output to a waste container. Three participants were collected with untreated lines, and three collections were performed with heparin flushed lines. Visible clotting was assessed, and blood samples were collected from the output at baseline, after 240 mL of blood collected, and at study endpoint, which was 400 mL collection or termination due excessive clotting or draw difficulties. Coagulation, hematology, and chemistry testing were performed on the samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visible clotting was observed at endpoint in the four procedures with the longest draw times. There were statistically significant differences in platelet count and fibrinogen concentration between baseline and endpoint samples of the non-heparin group. Clot strength decreased over time in the non-heparin group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The association between longer procedure times and visible clotting indicates direct transfusions should be completed based on time constraints rather than target volumes. Maintenance of platelet count, fibrinogen concentration, and clot strength in the heparin group suggest that heparin coated lines may enhance the safety of direct transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":"65 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S63-S67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The anticipated multidomain operations of future battlefields necessitates minimalistic medical strategies for treatment of combat wounded. Direct transfusion, involving the administration of blood directly from a donor to a recipient, may be a solution for treating hemorrhagic shock patients in an austere environment where the tools to execute clinical practice guidelines are unavailable.

Study design and methods: Six participants were enrolled in this observational pilot study. Blood was drawn through medical tubing using a 60 mL syringe and pushed through a second medical tubing set with output to a waste container. Three participants were collected with untreated lines, and three collections were performed with heparin flushed lines. Visible clotting was assessed, and blood samples were collected from the output at baseline, after 240 mL of blood collected, and at study endpoint, which was 400 mL collection or termination due excessive clotting or draw difficulties. Coagulation, hematology, and chemistry testing were performed on the samples.

Results: Visible clotting was observed at endpoint in the four procedures with the longest draw times. There were statistically significant differences in platelet count and fibrinogen concentration between baseline and endpoint samples of the non-heparin group. Clot strength decreased over time in the non-heparin group.

Discussion: The association between longer procedure times and visible clotting indicates direct transfusions should be completed based on time constraints rather than target volumes. Maintenance of platelet count, fibrinogen concentration, and clot strength in the heparin group suggest that heparin coated lines may enhance the safety of direct transfusions.

评估使用注射器采集全血的直接输血可行性。
背景:未来战场预期的多域作战需要极简的医疗策略来治疗战斗伤员。直接输血,包括将血液直接从供体输送到受者,可能是在缺乏执行临床实践指南的工具的严峻环境中治疗失血性休克患者的一种解决方案。研究设计和方法:6名参与者参加了这项观察性初步研究。使用60毫升注射器通过医用管抽取血液,并通过第二套医用管将血液输出到废物容器中。三名参与者用未处理的线收集,三名用肝素冲洗线收集。评估可见凝血情况,并在基线、采集240 mL血液后和研究终点采集400 mL血液或因过度凝血或抽血困难而终止时采集血液样本。对样品进行凝血、血液学和化学检测。结果:4种拔牙时间最长的手术终点均可见凝血。非肝素组基线和终点样本的血小板计数和纤维蛋白原浓度差异有统计学意义。在非肝素组中,凝块强度随着时间的推移而降低。讨论:较长的操作时间和可见凝血之间的关系表明,应根据时间限制而不是目标容量完成直接输血。肝素组维持血小板计数、纤维蛋白原浓度和凝块强度提示肝素包被线可提高直接输注的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信