Validating Emotion Analysis on Social Media Text for Detecting Psychological Distress: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Issues in Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1080/01612840.2025.2488328
Sehee Kim, Seungjea Lee, Elina Lee
{"title":"Validating Emotion Analysis on Social Media Text for Detecting Psychological Distress: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Sehee Kim, Seungjea Lee, Elina Lee","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2025.2488328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the relationship between self-reported psychological distress and emotions in social media posts, using a deep learning-based emotion analysis model. A cross-sectional design was used, collecting data from Instagram and Threads between June and September 2024. Social media users completed a survey assessing psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, perceived stress, and social isolation, and consented to the analysis of their textual posts. The emotion analysis model, based on KoBERT, classified seven emotions-happiness, sadness, anger, neutrality, anxiety, disgust, and surprise-in the text. Data from 87 participants and 2,610 sentences were analyzed using Pearson's correlation, t-tests, and ROC curves with SPSS software. Results showed a strong link between emotional expressions in posts and reported distress, with the most significant correlations involving happiness and sadness across all distress types. The model also demonstrated high predictive accuracy for psychological distress, with an AUC ranging from 0.845 to 0.924 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). These findings support the use of emotion analysis as a tool for early detection and monitoring of psychological distress through social media, highlighting its potential in mental health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"614-623"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2025.2488328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between self-reported psychological distress and emotions in social media posts, using a deep learning-based emotion analysis model. A cross-sectional design was used, collecting data from Instagram and Threads between June and September 2024. Social media users completed a survey assessing psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, perceived stress, and social isolation, and consented to the analysis of their textual posts. The emotion analysis model, based on KoBERT, classified seven emotions-happiness, sadness, anger, neutrality, anxiety, disgust, and surprise-in the text. Data from 87 participants and 2,610 sentences were analyzed using Pearson's correlation, t-tests, and ROC curves with SPSS software. Results showed a strong link between emotional expressions in posts and reported distress, with the most significant correlations involving happiness and sadness across all distress types. The model also demonstrated high predictive accuracy for psychological distress, with an AUC ranging from 0.845 to 0.924 (p < 0.001). These findings support the use of emotion analysis as a tool for early detection and monitoring of psychological distress through social media, highlighting its potential in mental health interventions.

验证社交媒体文本的情绪分析检测心理困扰:一个横断面调查。
本研究使用基于深度学习的情绪分析模型,调查了社交媒体帖子中自我报告的心理困扰与情绪之间的关系。研究采用了横截面设计,在2024年6月至9月期间从Instagram和Threads收集数据。社交媒体用户完成了一项评估心理困扰的调查,包括抑郁、焦虑、感知压力和社交孤立,并同意对他们的文本帖子进行分析。基于KoBERT的情绪分析模型将文本中的七种情绪分类为快乐、悲伤、愤怒、中立、焦虑、厌恶和惊讶。采用SPSS软件对87名被试、2610个句子的数据进行Pearson相关、t检验和ROC曲线分析。结果显示,帖子中的情绪表达与所报告的痛苦之间存在很强的联系,在所有痛苦类型中,最显著的相关性涉及快乐和悲伤。该模型还显示出对心理困扰的高预测准确性,AUC范围为0.845至0.924 (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信