Impact of surgery and radiation on radicular pain and myotomic weakness in patients with metastatic spine disease.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Arthur R Bartolozzi, Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Arjun Sahgal, Laurence D Rhines, Daniel M Sciubba, Aron Lazary, Michael H Weber, James M Schuster, Stefano Boriani, Chetan Bettegowda, Paul M Arnold, Michelle J Clarke, Michael G Fehlings, Ziya L Gokaslan, Charles G Fisher, Mark Bilsky, Nicolas Dea
{"title":"Impact of surgery and radiation on radicular pain and myotomic weakness in patients with metastatic spine disease.","authors":"Arthur R Bartolozzi, Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Arjun Sahgal, Laurence D Rhines, Daniel M Sciubba, Aron Lazary, Michael H Weber, James M Schuster, Stefano Boriani, Chetan Bettegowda, Paul M Arnold, Michelle J Clarke, Michael G Fehlings, Ziya L Gokaslan, Charles G Fisher, Mark Bilsky, Nicolas Dea","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surgery is typically indicated for mechanical pain in metastatic spine disease or severe neurological compromise, but how radicular pain responds to oncological treatment is not well described. The primary aim of this study was to describe how radicular pain responds to oncological treatment, while secondary aims included pain outcomes between patients with mechanical and tumoral pain and motor improvement in patients with weakness due to nerve root compression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases were identified from an international multicenter prospective cohort. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain at 3 months posttreatment. Motor recovery from radicular compression in patients with myotomic weakness and low-grade epidural compression was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 284 patients, 129 (45%) had radicular pain ± axial pain and 155 (55%) had axial pain alone. The two groups did not significantly differ in age, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, or treatment. Two hundred two patients (71%) underwent surgery ± radiotherapy, whereas 82 (29%) had radiotherapy alone. The NRS score of patients with radicular pain improved from 6.7 to 3.4 at 3 months, a statistically significantly higher magnitude than in patients with isolated axial pain (p = 0.021). The NRS score at 3 months was similar for both groups (p = 0.876). Patients with radicular pain experienced a larger improvement with surgery compared with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.007) but had higher pretreatment pain (mean NRS score 7.0 vs 5.6, p = 0.013). Twenty-three patients identified with radicular/myotomic weakness (mean American Spinal Injury Association score 96.3 ± 3.2) at baseline improved 2.1 ± 3.8 points at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The magnitude of pain improvement for patients with radicular pain following surgery and radiotherapy for metastatic spine disease is higher than for patients with axial pain alone. Surgery is associated with a larger improvement in radicular pain than radiotherapy alone. These results will allow clinicians to tailor treatment options for patients with metastatic spine disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 5","pages":"E14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Surgery is typically indicated for mechanical pain in metastatic spine disease or severe neurological compromise, but how radicular pain responds to oncological treatment is not well described. The primary aim of this study was to describe how radicular pain responds to oncological treatment, while secondary aims included pain outcomes between patients with mechanical and tumoral pain and motor improvement in patients with weakness due to nerve root compression.

Methods: Patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases were identified from an international multicenter prospective cohort. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain at 3 months posttreatment. Motor recovery from radicular compression in patients with myotomic weakness and low-grade epidural compression was also analyzed.

Results: Of 284 patients, 129 (45%) had radicular pain ± axial pain and 155 (55%) had axial pain alone. The two groups did not significantly differ in age, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, or treatment. Two hundred two patients (71%) underwent surgery ± radiotherapy, whereas 82 (29%) had radiotherapy alone. The NRS score of patients with radicular pain improved from 6.7 to 3.4 at 3 months, a statistically significantly higher magnitude than in patients with isolated axial pain (p = 0.021). The NRS score at 3 months was similar for both groups (p = 0.876). Patients with radicular pain experienced a larger improvement with surgery compared with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.007) but had higher pretreatment pain (mean NRS score 7.0 vs 5.6, p = 0.013). Twenty-three patients identified with radicular/myotomic weakness (mean American Spinal Injury Association score 96.3 ± 3.2) at baseline improved 2.1 ± 3.8 points at 3 months.

Conclusions: The magnitude of pain improvement for patients with radicular pain following surgery and radiotherapy for metastatic spine disease is higher than for patients with axial pain alone. Surgery is associated with a larger improvement in radicular pain than radiotherapy alone. These results will allow clinicians to tailor treatment options for patients with metastatic spine disease.

手术和放疗对转移性脊柱疾病患者神经根痛和肌切开性无力的影响。
目的:手术通常用于转移性脊柱疾病或严重神经损伤的机械性疼痛,但神经根痛对肿瘤治疗的反应尚未得到很好的描述。本研究的主要目的是描述神经根痛对肿瘤治疗的反应,而次要目的包括机械性和肿瘤性疼痛患者的疼痛结果,以及神经根压迫导致的虚弱患者的运动改善。方法:从国际多中心前瞻性队列中确定接受手术和/或放疗治疗的脊柱转移患者。主要终点是治疗后3个月疼痛的数值评定量表(NRS)评分。还分析了肌切开性无力和低度硬膜外压迫患者神经根受压后的运动恢复情况。结果:284例患者中,129例(45%)为根性疼痛±轴性疼痛,155例(55%)为单纯轴性疼痛。两组在年龄、合并症、肿瘤特征或治疗方面没有显著差异。202例(71%)接受手术+放疗,82例(29%)接受单纯放疗。神经根性疼痛患者的NRS评分在3个月时从6.7分提高到3.4分,显著高于孤立性轴性疼痛患者(p = 0.021)。两组患者3个月NRS评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.876)。与单纯放疗相比,手术对神经根性疼痛的改善更大(p = 0.007),但术前疼痛更高(平均NRS评分7.0 vs 5.6, p = 0.013)。23例确诊为神经根/肌切开性无力的患者(美国脊髓损伤协会平均评分96.3±3.2)在基线时改善了2.1±3.8分。结论:转移性脊柱疾病的根性疼痛患者手术和放疗后疼痛的改善程度高于单纯轴性疼痛患者。手术比单纯放疗对神经根性疼痛的改善更大。这些结果将允许临床医生为转移性脊柱疾病患者量身定制治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信