Memory selectivity in younger and older adults: The role of conative factors in value-directed remembering.

IF 3.5 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1037/pag0000885
Ashley L Miller, Alan D Castel
{"title":"Memory selectivity in younger and older adults: The role of conative factors in value-directed remembering.","authors":"Ashley L Miller, Alan D Castel","doi":"10.1037/pag0000885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Memory selectivity refers to our ability to flexibly prioritize and remember important information over less important information. In three studies, we investigated the roles of various conative factors (i.e., task-specific motivation, memory self-efficacy, and self-determined learning goals) as mechanisms that might support intact, if not superior, memory selectivity in older age. Specifically, all three studies assessed efficacy beliefs (in younger and older adults) before participants completed a standard value-directed remembering task. Measures of task-specific motivation (Studies 1-3) and self-determined learning goals (Studies 2-3) were also included. Results suggested that older adults were generally more selective and more motivated to perform well on the value-directed remembering task compared to younger adults, even though they were also less confident in their memory abilities and tried to remember fewer words on each list. Critically, though, heightened task-specific motivation was associated with a tendency to recall a greater proportion of the to-be-remembered material but was not consistently associated with selectivity. A weak negative correlation between motivation and selectivity was only found in Study 3. However, inefficacious beliefs and lower self-determined learning goals were reliably associated with superior memory selectivity. Path analyses further revealed that memory self-efficacy and self-determined learning goals accounted for older adults' tendency to selectively remember important information. Collectively, these results are consistent with the idea that awareness of current memory limitations encourages older adults to focus on less material, which helps older adults more efficiently allocate attention to important information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":"371-390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000885","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Memory selectivity refers to our ability to flexibly prioritize and remember important information over less important information. In three studies, we investigated the roles of various conative factors (i.e., task-specific motivation, memory self-efficacy, and self-determined learning goals) as mechanisms that might support intact, if not superior, memory selectivity in older age. Specifically, all three studies assessed efficacy beliefs (in younger and older adults) before participants completed a standard value-directed remembering task. Measures of task-specific motivation (Studies 1-3) and self-determined learning goals (Studies 2-3) were also included. Results suggested that older adults were generally more selective and more motivated to perform well on the value-directed remembering task compared to younger adults, even though they were also less confident in their memory abilities and tried to remember fewer words on each list. Critically, though, heightened task-specific motivation was associated with a tendency to recall a greater proportion of the to-be-remembered material but was not consistently associated with selectivity. A weak negative correlation between motivation and selectivity was only found in Study 3. However, inefficacious beliefs and lower self-determined learning goals were reliably associated with superior memory selectivity. Path analyses further revealed that memory self-efficacy and self-determined learning goals accounted for older adults' tendency to selectively remember important information. Collectively, these results are consistent with the idea that awareness of current memory limitations encourages older adults to focus on less material, which helps older adults more efficiently allocate attention to important information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

年轻人和老年人的记忆选择性:价值导向记忆中条件因素的作用。
记忆选择性指的是我们灵活地将重要信息优先于不重要信息的能力。在三项研究中,我们调查了各种条件因素(即任务特定动机、记忆自我效能和自我决定的学习目标)作为支持老年人记忆选择性的机制的作用。具体来说,在参与者完成标准的价值导向记忆任务之前,所有三项研究都评估了有效性信念(在年轻人和老年人中)。任务特定动机(研究1-3)和自主学习目标(研究2-3)的测量也包括在内。结果表明,与年轻人相比,老年人通常更有选择性,更有动力在价值导向的记忆任务中表现出色,尽管他们对自己的记忆能力也不那么自信,并且试图记住的单词也更少。然而,关键的是,任务特定动机的增强与回忆更大比例要记住的材料的倾向有关,但与选择性并不总是相关。动机与选择性之间仅在研究3中存在微弱的负相关关系。然而,无效的信念和较低的自主学习目标与较高的记忆选择性可靠地相关。路径分析进一步表明,记忆自我效能和自我确定的学习目标是老年人选择性记忆重要信息的原因。总的来说,这些结果与这样一种观点是一致的,即意识到当前的记忆限制会鼓励老年人关注更少的材料,这有助于老年人更有效地将注意力分配到重要的信息上。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信