Effectiveness of oral vs intravenous acetaminophen on pain management following total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Bin Lu, Ai-Xian Tian, Zheng-Rui Fan, Xing-Wen Zhao, Hong-Zhen Jin, Jian-Xiong Ma, Xin-Long Ma
{"title":"Effectiveness of oral <i>vs</i> intravenous acetaminophen on pain management following total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bin Lu, Ai-Xian Tian, Zheng-Rui Fan, Xing-Wen Zhao, Hong-Zhen Jin, Jian-Xiong Ma, Xin-Long Ma","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i4.104452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the management of postoperative pain following total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including acetaminophen, plays a key role in alleviating pain. However, the comparison between intravenous and oral acetaminophen administration in patients undergoing full joint replacement surgery remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of intravenous and oral acetaminophen in alleviating pain and supporting rehabilitation following TJA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched to identify cohort studies. The effects of intravenous and oral acetaminophen for managing pain and supporting rehabilitation following TJA were analysed using randomized controlled trials. PRISMA guidelines were followed. The effectiveness of the administration routes was compared based on visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24 and 48 h, total morphine usage within 24 h, and total duration of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included seven studies comparing intravenous acetaminophen groups and oral acetaminophen groups. The results demonstrated that oral acetaminophen was comparable to intravenous acetaminophen with regard to VAS scores at 24 h and 48 h (<i>P</i> = 0.76 and 0.08, respectively). The difference in total morphine use between the two groups was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.22). However, the total hospital stay duration of the intravenous acetaminophen groups was significantly reduced compared to the oral acetaminophen groups (<i>P</i> = 0.0005), showing significant advantages in optimizing postoperative recovery and shortening hospitalisation time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After TJA surgery, intravenous injection of acetaminophen can shorten hospitalisation time and is suitable for rapid analgesia, Oral administration has become the preferred choice for mild cases due to its convenience and economy, providing a basis for clinical drug selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 4","pages":"104452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i4.104452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the management of postoperative pain following total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including acetaminophen, plays a key role in alleviating pain. However, the comparison between intravenous and oral acetaminophen administration in patients undergoing full joint replacement surgery remains controversial.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of intravenous and oral acetaminophen in alleviating pain and supporting rehabilitation following TJA.

Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched to identify cohort studies. The effects of intravenous and oral acetaminophen for managing pain and supporting rehabilitation following TJA were analysed using randomized controlled trials. PRISMA guidelines were followed. The effectiveness of the administration routes was compared based on visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24 and 48 h, total morphine usage within 24 h, and total duration of hospital stay.

Results: The meta-analysis included seven studies comparing intravenous acetaminophen groups and oral acetaminophen groups. The results demonstrated that oral acetaminophen was comparable to intravenous acetaminophen with regard to VAS scores at 24 h and 48 h (P = 0.76 and 0.08, respectively). The difference in total morphine use between the two groups was not significant (P = 0.22). However, the total hospital stay duration of the intravenous acetaminophen groups was significantly reduced compared to the oral acetaminophen groups (P = 0.0005), showing significant advantages in optimizing postoperative recovery and shortening hospitalisation time.

Conclusion: After TJA surgery, intravenous injection of acetaminophen can shorten hospitalisation time and is suitable for rapid analgesia, Oral administration has become the preferred choice for mild cases due to its convenience and economy, providing a basis for clinical drug selection.

口服对乙酰氨基酚与静脉注射对全关节置换术后疼痛管理的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:在全关节置换术(TJA)术后疼痛的处理中,非甾体类抗炎药的使用,包括对乙酰氨基酚,在减轻疼痛方面起着关键作用。然而,对全关节置换术患者静脉注射和口服扑热息痛的比较仍然存在争议。目的:评价静脉和口服对乙酰氨基酚对TJA术后疼痛缓解和康复支持的效果。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,确定队列研究。采用随机对照试验分析静脉和口服对乙酰氨基酚对TJA后疼痛管理和支持康复的影响。遵循PRISMA准则。通过24、48 h视觉模拟评分(VAS)、24 h内吗啡总用量及总住院时间比较给药途径的有效性。结果:meta分析包括7项研究,比较静脉对乙酰氨基酚组和口服对乙酰氨基酚组。结果显示,口服对乙酰氨基酚与静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚在24 h和48 h的VAS评分相当(P分别为0.76和0.08)。两组间吗啡总使用量差异无统计学意义(P = 0.22)。然而,与口服对乙酰氨基酚组相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚组的总住院时间显著缩短(P = 0.0005),在优化术后恢复和缩短住院时间方面具有显著优势。结论:TJA术后静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚可缩短住院时间,适用于快速镇痛,口服方便、经济,已成为轻症患者的首选,为临床药物选择提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信