A prospective study to compare the safety and efficacy of toric intra-ocular lens vs. opposite clear corneal incision in patients undergoing phacoemulsification for age-related cataract with pre-existing corneal astigmatism.

Sandeep Gupta, Nidhi Kalra, Ankita Singh, Avinash Mishra, Jaya Kaushik
{"title":"A prospective study to compare the safety and efficacy of toric intra-ocular lens vs. opposite clear corneal incision in patients undergoing phacoemulsification for age-related cataract with pre-existing corneal astigmatism.","authors":"Sandeep Gupta, Nidhi Kalra, Ankita Singh, Avinash Mishra, Jaya Kaushik","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2025.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of toric intra ocular lens (IOL) implantation vs. opposite clear corneal incision (OCCI) during cataract surgery to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism in patients with age related cataract by comparing the postoperative residual astigmatism, the uncorrected distance visual acuity and the adverse effects following both the procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot prospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital among patients undergoing cataract surgery over two years. A total of 150 eyes with pre-existing corneal astigmatism between 1 to 2.5 D were divided into two groups of 75 each by permuted block randomization. Group A underwent implantation of <i>AcrySof Toric IOLSN6AT4</i> (Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Tx), and Group B underwent implantation of normal non-toric aspheric <i>AcrySof IOL SN60WF with</i> OCCI on steep axis. Both groups were followed up for 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the OCCI Group, the difference between mean K1-K2 preoperative and 12 weeks postoperative (mean ± SD) of patients was 1.55 ± 0.17D. In the TORIC IOL Group, the difference between the mean K1-K2 preoperative and 12-week postoperative values (mean ± SD) for patients was 0.53 ± 0.11. The difference in mean K1-K2 pre-operatively and at 12 weeks was statistically significant for both groups (p < 0.0001). There was a significant reduction in corneal astigmatism in the OCCI group at 01 week.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In our study, the difference in mean K1-K2 at 1 week between the two Groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001), as OCCI acts directly on the corneal plane, whereas Toric IOLs reduce astigmatism at the lens plane without affecting corneal curvature. There was a significant reduction in corneal astigmatism in the OCCI group at 1 week. This reduction continued to stabilize at 12 weeks. The corneal astigmatism remained stable in the post-operative period in the Toric IOL group. The decrease in astigmatism was more significant in the toric IOL group than in the OCCI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate a similar efficacy of OCCI in reducing corneal astigmatism of up to 1.5 D compared to Toric IOLs. The uncorrected visual acuity was superior in the Toric IOL group. However, this difference was reduced significantly by 12 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"69 1","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2025.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of toric intra ocular lens (IOL) implantation vs. opposite clear corneal incision (OCCI) during cataract surgery to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism in patients with age related cataract by comparing the postoperative residual astigmatism, the uncorrected distance visual acuity and the adverse effects following both the procedures.

Methods: A pilot prospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital among patients undergoing cataract surgery over two years. A total of 150 eyes with pre-existing corneal astigmatism between 1 to 2.5 D were divided into two groups of 75 each by permuted block randomization. Group A underwent implantation of AcrySof Toric IOLSN6AT4 (Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Tx), and Group B underwent implantation of normal non-toric aspheric AcrySof IOL SN60WF with OCCI on steep axis. Both groups were followed up for 24 weeks.

Results: In the OCCI Group, the difference between mean K1-K2 preoperative and 12 weeks postoperative (mean ± SD) of patients was 1.55 ± 0.17D. In the TORIC IOL Group, the difference between the mean K1-K2 preoperative and 12-week postoperative values (mean ± SD) for patients was 0.53 ± 0.11. The difference in mean K1-K2 pre-operatively and at 12 weeks was statistically significant for both groups (p < 0.0001). There was a significant reduction in corneal astigmatism in the OCCI group at 01 week.

Discussion: In our study, the difference in mean K1-K2 at 1 week between the two Groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001), as OCCI acts directly on the corneal plane, whereas Toric IOLs reduce astigmatism at the lens plane without affecting corneal curvature. There was a significant reduction in corneal astigmatism in the OCCI group at 1 week. This reduction continued to stabilize at 12 weeks. The corneal astigmatism remained stable in the post-operative period in the Toric IOL group. The decrease in astigmatism was more significant in the toric IOL group than in the OCCI group.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate a similar efficacy of OCCI in reducing corneal astigmatism of up to 1.5 D compared to Toric IOLs. The uncorrected visual acuity was superior in the Toric IOL group. However, this difference was reduced significantly by 12 weeks.

一项前瞻性研究,比较环形人工晶状体与对面透明角膜切口对年龄相关性白内障合并角膜散光行超声乳化术患者的安全性和有效性。
目的:比较环面人工晶状体(IOL)植入术与对向透明角膜切口(OCCI)植入术对年龄相关性白内障患者原有角膜散光的安全性和有效性,比较两种手术方式术后残留散光、未矫正距离视力及不良反应。方法:在一家三级医院对接受白内障手术两年以上的患者进行前瞻性研究。采用分组随机法将150只角膜散光在1 ~ 2.5 D之间的眼睛分为两组,每组75只。A组植入术为AcrySof Toric IOL sn6at4 (Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Tx), B组植入术为正常非环形非球面AcrySof IOL SN60WF, OCCI为陡轴。两组均随访24周。结果:OCCI组患者术前与术后12周平均K1-K2差值(平均±SD)为1.55±0.17D。TORIC IOL组患者术前和术后12周的平均K1-K2值(平均±SD)差值为0.53±0.11。两组患者术前和术后12周平均K1-K2差异有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。OCCI组在01周时角膜散光明显减少。讨论:在我们的研究中,两组在1周时的平均K1-K2差异有统计学意义(p < 0.0001),因为OCCI直接作用于角膜平面,而Toric iol在不影响角膜曲率的情况下减少晶状体平面的散光。OCCI组在1周时角膜散光明显减少。这种减少在12周时继续稳定。Toric IOL组术后角膜散光保持稳定。环形人工晶状体组散光的减少比OCCI组更明显。结论:这些结果表明OCCI在减少高达1.5 D的角膜散光方面的效果与Toric iol相似。环面人工晶状体组未矫正视力优于环面人工晶状体组。然而,这种差异在12周后显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信